RESUMEN
The scale-up of rifampicin-based prevention regimens is an essential part of the global leprosy strategy. Daily rifampicin may reduce the effectiveness of the oral contraceptive pill (OCP), but little is known about the effects of rifampicin at the less frequent dosing intervals used for leprosy prophylaxis. As many women of reproductive age rely on OCP for family planning, evaluating the interaction with less-than-daily rifampicin regimens would enhance the scalability and acceptability of leprosy prophylaxis. Using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic model of rifampicin induction, we simulated predicted changes in OCP clearance when coadministered with varying rifampicin dosing schedules. Rifampicin given as a single dose (600 or 1200 mg) or 600 mg every 4 weeks was not predicted to result in a clinically relevant interaction with OCP, defined as a >25% increase in clearance. Simulations of daily rifampicin were predicted to increase OCP clearance within the range of observed changes previously reported in the literature. Therefore, our findings suggest that OCP efficacy will be maintained when coadministered with rifampicin-based leprosy prophylaxis regimens of 600 mg once, 1200 mg once, and 600 mg every 4 weeks. This work provides reassurance to stakeholders that leprosy prophylaxis can be used with OCP without any additional recommendations for contraception prevention.
RESUMEN
AIM: Rhenium-188-HEDP ((188)Re-HEDP) is an effective radiopharmaceutical for the palliative treatment of osteoblastic bone metastases. However, only limited data on its routine use are available and its effect on quality of life (QoL) has not been studied. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical benefit of (188)Re-HEDP in routine clinical care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prostate or breast cancer patients with painful bone metastases receiving (188)Re-HEDP as a routine clinical procedure were eligible for evaluation. Clinical benefit was assessed in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Pain palliation and QoL were monitored using the visual analogue scale (VAS), corrected for opioid intake, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global health status/QoL-scale. Thrombocyte and leukocyte nadirs were used to assess haematological toxicity. RESULTS: 45 and 47 patients were evaluable for pain palliation and QoL, respectively. After a single injection of (188)Re-HEDP, the overall pain response rate was 69% and mean VAS-scores decreased relevantly and significantly (p < 0.05). Repeated treatment resulted in similar pain response. The overall QoL response rate was 68% and mean Global health status/QoL-scores increased relevantly and significantly. Haematological side effects were mild and transient. CONCLUSION: The clinically relevant response on pain and quality of life and the limited adverse events prove clinical benefit of treatment with (188)Re-HEDP and support its use in routine clinical care. Its effectiveness appears comparable to that of external beam radiotherapy.
