Guidance for clinical practice using emergency and point-of-care ultrasonography.

Owing to the miniaturization of diagnostic ultrasound scanners and their spread of their bedside use, ultrasonography has been actively utilized in emergency situations. Ultrasonography performed by medical personnel with focused approaches at the bedside for clinical decision-making and improving the quality of invasive procedures is now called point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS). The concept of POCUS has spread worldwide; however, in Japan, formal clinical guidance concerning POCUS is lacking, except for the application of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation. The Committee for the Promotion of POCUS in the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) has often discussed improving the quality of acute care using POCUS, and the "Clinical Guidance for Emergency and Point-of-Care Ultrasonography" was finally established with the endorsement of JAAM. The background, targets for acute care physicians, rationale based on published articles, and integrated application were mentioned in this guidance. The core points include the fundamental principles of ultrasound, airway, chest, cardiac, abdominal, and deep venous ultrasound, ultrasound-guided procedures, and the usage of ultrasound based on symptoms. Additional points, which are currently being considered as potential core points in the future, have also been widely mentioned. This guidance describes the overview and future direction of ultrasonography for acute care physicians and can be utilized for emergency ultrasound education. We hope this guidance will contribute to the effective use of ultrasonography in acute care settings in Japan.

Characteristics of Anaphylactic Reactions: A Prospective Observational Study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a systemic, life-threating, allergic reaction in which the clinical features may vary in different populations or due to the allergic triggers. Moreover, the timing and characteristics of biphasic anaphylactic reactions remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of anaphylaxis cases assessed and treated in Japanese hospitals. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of anaphylactic reactions treated in the Emergency Department (ED) of two medical centers from June 2016 to May 2019. All patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis were enrolled in this study. Data collected included patient demographics, symptoms and signs, treatment, clinical course, and suspected triggers. Descriptive statistics and univariate methods were used in the analyses. RESULTS: We enrolled 302 patients. The median age was 32 years (interquartile range 13-37) and the sample included 182 (60.3%) women. Of the 302 patients, 179 (59.3%) had a history of allergic reactions. The dermatologic, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and cardiac systems were involved in 297 (98.3%), 248 (82.1%), 150 (49.7%), and 55 (18.2%), respectively. Nineteen patients (6.3%) experienced biphasic anaphylactic reactions. Epinephrine use was associated with a lower incidence of biphasic anaphylactic reaction (odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9). Time to recurrence of symptoms ranged from 2 to 48 h (median: 10 h). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective ED study, foods were the most common triggers of anaphylaxis, and epinephrine administration was associated with a decreased occurrence of biphasic anaphylactic reactions. Over half of patients experiencing biphasic anaphylactic reactions developed symptoms more than 10 h after presentation.

CPR related thoracic injury: a comparison of CPR guidelines between 2005 and 2010.

Aim: The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of thoracic injuries associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed under the 2005 and the 2010 guidelines. Methods: We evaluated patients who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in 2010 (2005 group) and 2012 (2010 group). We analyzed the incidence and characteristics of rib fractures and pneumothoraces received during CPR as determined by medical records and image studies. Results: Two hundred and ninety-two patients in the 2005 group and 243 in the 2010 group were enrolled. The number of patients with rib fractures was greater in the 2010 group than in the 2005 group (123 [42.1%] versus 167 [68.7%], P < 0.001), and the number of pneumothorax patients with rib fractures was also higher (8 [2.7%] versus 21 [8.6%], P = 0.004). Of the 21 patients, four had a tension pneumothorax. The anterior-posterior diameter of the chest (APD) was smaller in patients with a pneumothorax and rib fractures than those without the injuries (166.0 mm [standard deviation 22.8] versus 176.2 mm [standard deviation 21.0], P = 0.04), and the APD for patients of Japanese descent was smaller than that of patients of European descent by more than 50 mm. Conclusion: The number of rib fractures and pneumothoraces received during CPR increased significantly under the 2010 guidelines when compared with the 2005 guidelines. As the APD for patients of Japanese descent is smaller than that of patients of European descent, Japanese medical facilities need to be prepared for possible fatal adverse events associated with CPR under the current international guidelines.

Incidence and characteristics of biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis: evaluation of 114 inpatients.

AIM: Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction that potentially causes death. Most anaphylactic reactions are uniphasic, but some cases may be biphasic or protracted. However, these clinical epidemiology concepts are unfamiliar in Japan. Therefore, we have investigated the incidences and characteristics of patients with biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with anaphylaxis in a single emergency medical center located in Yokohama, Japan from April 2009 to March 2012. We analyzed the incidences and characteristics of patients with biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis who needed to be admitted. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were diagnosed with anaphylaxis and 114 patients needed to be admitted. Of the 114 patients, 103 (90.4%) were uniphasic, 7 (6.1%) were biphasic and 4 (3.5%) were protracted anaphylaxis. The most common antigens were foods and drugs. The median onset of a biphasic reaction was 8 h and dermatologic symptoms were mostly observed. Regarding severity, mild symptoms were seen in four cases, similar symptoms to the initial reaction were seen in two cases, and only one case was severe. The duration of protracted anaphylaxis varied from 2 to 8 days. CONCLUSION: The incidence of biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis in inpatients was 6.1% and 3.5%, respectively. The median onset of biphasic reaction was 8 h, and most symptoms were mild or similar to the initial reaction. We suggest that patients with anaphylaxis need an 8-h and ideally a 24-h observation period in order to monitor possible biphasic reactions. The duration of protracted anaphylaxis was up to 8 days.

[Diaphragmatic eventration resulting from phrenicectomy treated with surgical method; report of a case].

The case was a 59-year-old man who has a history of left mediastinal tumor resection with left phrenicectomy. The elevated diaphragm revealed by chest X-ray 7 years after the operation led to diagnosis of diaphragmatic eventration. Since any symptom was seen in the early period, "wait and watch" strategy was done for management. Both the abdominal enlarged feeling and the dyspnea on effort were appeared 10 years after the operation. Under the speculation of these symptoms related to the elevated abdominal organs came up with diaphragmatic eventration, surgical method the plication of the diaphragm was performed. The diaphragm was plicated by interrupted suture as opening the diaphragm to avoid injury the abdominal organs, and reinforced with the Marlex mesh. We used artificial mesh to reinforce the thin diaphragm with exceptation of prevent the postoperative recurrence, because a result of the etiological process of the case was considered as disuse atrophy of diaphragm after phrenicectomy.