Extranodal extension in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: more to it than meets the eye.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Extranodal extension (ENE) is an independent prognosticator in head-neck Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). All patients with ENE, however, do not behave the same, and there is a need for further risk stratification. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of various grades of ENE and the number of nodes with ENE on overall survival (OS) in oral cavity SCC (OCSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with node-positive OCSCC treated with primary surgery and appropriate adjuvant therapy during the year 2011 were evaluated. Surgical histopathology slides of all patients were reviewed, and ENE was graded according to the grading system proposed by Lewis Jr et al. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, lymph node density (LND) greater than or equal to 0.12 (P = 0.013), the presence of ENE in more than two nodes (P = 0.006), and ENE grade 3 through 4 (P = 0.035) were associated with worse (OS). Conventional prognostic factors such as tumor (T) stage, nodal (N) stage, stage grouping, depth of invasion, and pattern of invasion did not have a significant impact on OS. On multivariate analysis, the presence of ENE in more than two nodes (P = 0.018) independently predicted a worse OS. Extranodal extension grade 3 through 4 showed a trend toward significance (P = 0.08). A combination of LND greater than or equal to 0.12, ENE grade 3 through 4, and ENE in more than two lymph nodes conferred the poorest prognosis (3-year OS: 18%; P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: In patients with ENE and advanced nodal disease, T stage, N stage, stage group, depth, and pattern of invasion lose their impact on OS. In patients with ENE, nodal characteristics such as LND, the number of nodes with ENE, and grade of ENE serve as important prognosticators and aid in further risk stratification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:1130-1136, 2019.

Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: A clinical curiosity presenting a diagnostic challenge.

Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm associated with tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) and elevated serum FGF-23. Common in extremities, PMT rarely occurs in sinonasal region. We report a series of sinonasal PMT diagnosed at our institute over a 6-year period. Six cases of sinonasal PMT were identified during this period, of which five presented with features of TIO. Median age of patients was 45.5 years. All six tumors were composed of stellate to spindled cells, with prominent staghorn vasculature in four cases. Typical smudgy matrix was seen in all cases, but only focally; grungy calcification was absent. Accurate diagnosis of PMTs is imperative, as complete excision leads to dramatic resolution of TIO symptoms. Lack of knowledge of this entity prevents clinicians from ordering relevant investigations. Absence of specific morphological features, like grungy calcification, and presentation at atypical locations makes the diagnosis challenging. Awareness of this entity is essential in order to suspect PMT in patients presenting with a soft tissue mass and features of TIO, however unusual the location may be.

Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of parotid: Is preoperative cytological diagnosis possible?

Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma is a recently recognized tumor of salivary gland with characteristic t(12;15)(q13;q25) that results in ETV6-NTRK3 fusion product. Distinguishing mammary analogue secretory carcinoma from other salivary gland tumors is important. Present study highlights cytologic findings in three cases of mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of parotid which facilitate preoperative diagnosis with the aid of ancillary diagnostic techniques. Fine needle aspiration cytology of parotid was performed on three cases after clinical examination. Immunocytochemistry for mammoglobin and S100 were performed. Parotidectomy was done in all cases. The corresponding hematoxylin and eosin stained slides and blocks of all cases were studied. Molecular analysis was done in one of the cases. Cases 1 and 3 revealed uniform atypical epithelial cells arranged in branching papillary pattern with few cells in microcystic pattern. Case 2 showed atypical cells arranged mainly in loose clusters and few singly dissociated. Individual cells revealed round nuclei, vesicular chromatin, prominent nucleoli and abundant finely vacuolated cytoplasm with metachromasia prominent in May-Grunwald-Giemsa smear (case 3). Characteristic hob-nail cells covering papillae were observed in cases 1 and 3. Immunocytochemistry showed strong positivity for mammoglobin and S100 thereby confirming the diagnosis of mammary analogue secretory carcinoma preoperatively. The diagnosis was in concordance with surgical specimen. Also, characteristic ETV6-NTRK3 translocation was confirmed in case 1. Increased awareness and high index of suspicion is necessary for the upfront diagnosis, more so for the papillary variant of mammary analogue secretory carcinoma. Immunocytochemistry aids in confirming this preoperative diagnosis, based on which treatment can be planned. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2016;44:519-525. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cytological Diagnostic Approach in 3 Cases of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis Presenting Primarily as a Thyroid Mass.

BACKGROUND: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a monoclonal disease of specialised histiocytes characterised by the proliferation of neoplastic Langerhans cells (LCs) with a varying admixture of mature lymphocytes, eosinophils and plasma cells. LCH commonly occurs in the paediatric population and young adults with the involvement of bone, skin and lymph nodes. LCH has a protracted clinical course with an overall mortality rate of 3%. Primary involvement of the thyroid gland in LCH at presentation is a rare phenomenon that can result in misdiagnosis with consequent mismanagement. CASE: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the thyroid was performed in 3 cases at a tertiary cancer centre, including 2 referral cases where the patient presented with the only symptom of progressive thyroid enlargement. These cases were reported initially or on review and the results were correlated with histology/ancillary techniques. A cytological diagnosis of suspicion for LCH was offered in 2 cases at our centre and 1 case was referred to our centre with a diagnosis of suspected papillary thyroid carcinoma. On review of outside smears at our centre, the diagnosis was changed to suspected LCH. The diagnosis was confirmed by immunopositivity for CD68, CD1a and S100 in 1 case and Tru-cut biopsy followed by immunohistochemistry for CD1a, S100, TTF-1 and LCA in the other 2 cases. CONCLUSION: FNAC was helpful in accurately diagnosing LCH even though the presentation was unusual. Thus, unnecessary surgery was obviated.