Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Elife ; 102021 08 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34342578

RESUMEN

Many host RNA sensors are positioned in the cytosol to detect viral RNA during infection. However, most positive-strand RNA viruses replicate within a modified organelle co-opted from intracellular membranes of the endomembrane system, which shields viral products from cellular innate immune sensors. Targeting innate RNA sensors to the endomembrane system may enhance their ability to sense RNA generated by viruses that use these compartments for replication. Here, we reveal that an isoform of oligoadenylate synthetase 1, OAS1 p46, is prenylated and targeted to the endomembrane system. Membrane localization of OAS1 p46 confers enhanced access to viral replication sites and results in increased antiviral activity against a subset of RNA viruses including flaviviruses, picornaviruses, and SARS-CoV-2. Finally, our human genetic analysis shows that the OAS1 splice-site SNP responsible for production of the OAS1 p46 isoform correlates with protection from severe COVID-19. This study highlights the importance of endomembrane targeting for the antiviral specificity of OAS1 and suggests that early control of SARS-CoV-2 replication through OAS1 p46 is an important determinant of COVID-19 severity.


Asunto(s)
2',5'-Oligoadenilato Sintetasa/metabolismo , COVID-19/virología , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , Animales , COVID-19/inmunología , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Línea Celular , Edición Génica , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación
2.
Nat Immunol ; 20(12): 1610-1620, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740798

RESUMEN

The initial response to viral infection is anticipatory, with host antiviral restriction factors and pathogen sensors constantly surveying the cell to rapidly mount an antiviral response through the synthesis and downstream activity of interferons. After pathogen clearance, the host's ability to resolve this antiviral response and return to homeostasis is critical. Here, we found that isoforms of the RNA-binding protein ZAP functioned as both a direct antiviral restriction factor and an interferon-resolution factor. The short isoform of ZAP bound to and mediated the degradation of several host interferon messenger RNAs, and thus acted as a negative feedback regulator of the interferon response. In contrast, the long isoform of ZAP had antiviral functions and did not regulate interferon. The two isoforms contained identical RNA-targeting domains, but differences in their intracellular localization modulated specificity for host versus viral RNA, which resulted in disparate effects on viral replication during the innate immune response.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Alphavirus/inmunología , Interferones/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/metabolismo , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/metabolismo , ARN/metabolismo , Proteínas Represoras/metabolismo , Virus Sindbis/fisiología , Infecciones por Alphavirus/genética , Retroalimentación Fisiológica , Células HEK293 , Células Hep G2 , Homeostasis , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/genética , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/metabolismo , Unión Proteica , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , ARN/genética , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ARN/genética , Proteínas Represoras/genética , Replicación Viral
3.
Immunity ; 51(3): 451-464.e6, 2019 09 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31471108

RESUMEN

Type I and III interferons (IFNs) activate similar downstream signaling cascades, but unlike type I IFNs, type III IFNs (IFNλ) do not elicit strong inflammatory responses in vivo. Here, we examined the molecular mechanisms underlying this disparity. Type I and III IFNs displayed kinetic differences in expression of IFN-stimulated genes and proinflammatory responses, with type I IFNs preferentially stimulating expression of the transcription factor IRF1. Type III IFNs failed to induce IRF1 expression because of low IFNλ receptor abundance and insufficient STAT1 activation on epithelial cells and thus did not activate the IRF1 proinflammatory gene program. Rather, IFNλ stimulation preferentially induced factors implicated in tissue repair. Our findings suggest that IFN receptor compartmentalization and abundance confer a spatiotemporal division of labor where type III IFNs control viral spread at the site of the infection while restricting tissue damage; the transient induction of inflammatory responses by type I IFNs recruits immune effectors to promote protective immunity.


Asunto(s)
Factor 1 Regulador del Interferón/inmunología , Interferón Tipo I/inmunología , Interferones/inmunología , Animales , Línea Celular , Células Epiteliales/inmunología , Humanos , Inflamación/inmunología , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Factor de Transcripción STAT1/inmunología , Interferón lambda
4.
J Cell Sci ; 130(11): 1965-1978, 2017 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28446539

RESUMEN

Cancer cell invasion is influenced by various biomechanical forces found within the microenvironment. We have previously found that invasion is enhanced in fibrosarcoma cells when transient mechanical stimulation is applied within an in vitro mechano-invasion assay. This enhancement of invasion is dependent on cofilin (CFL1), a known regulator of invadopodia maturation. Invadopodia are actin-rich structures present in invasive cancer cells that are enzymatically active and degrade the surrounding extracellular matrix to facilitate invasion. In this study, we examine changes in gene expression in response to tugging on matrix fibers. Interestingly, we find that integrin ß3 expression is downregulated and leads to an increase in cofilin activity, as evidenced by a reduction in its Ser3 phosphorylation levels. As a result, invadopodia lengthen and have increased enzymatic activity, indicating that transient mechanical stimulation promotes the maturation of invadopodia leading to increased levels of cell invasion. Our results are unique in defining an invasive mechanism specific to the invasive process of cancer cells that is triggered by tugging forces in the microenvironment, as opposed to rigidity, compression or stretch forces.


Asunto(s)
Cofilina 1/genética , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Integrina beta3/genética , Mecanotransducción Celular , Actinas/genética , Actinas/metabolismo , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Movimiento Celular , Cofilina 1/metabolismo , Matriz Extracelular/metabolismo , Matriz Extracelular/ultraestructura , Fibroblastos/ultraestructura , Humanos , Integrina beta3/metabolismo , Invasividad Neoplásica , Fosforilación , Proteolisis , Seudópodos/metabolismo , Seudópodos/ultraestructura
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...