The Relationship between a High Carbohydrate Diet and Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the impact of carbohydrate ratios in the diet consumed one day prior to the 75-g oral glucose screening test on both the screening test values and the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in the unselective pregnant population. MATERIAL-METHOD: 83 pregnant women who were under observation in the antenatal clinic of our hospital and underwent glucose tolerance tests were included in the study. The patients were given training by a dietitian to keep nutrition records of the day prior to glucose loading during their previous visits before any glucose loading. A carbohydrate intake of 40-60% was considered as the normal range in terms of the percentage of carbohydrates in the diet. A carbohydrate percentage above 60% was considered to be a high carbohydrate intake. The carbohydrate percentages in their diet over the past 24 hours was compared with the effect on the glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: Out of the 83 pregnant women included in the study, 40 of them had a high carbohydrate diet (HCD) prior to the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and the average carbohydrate percentage of this diet was found to be 62%. The remaining 43 patients had an average carbohydrate percentage of 49% and belonged to the group that had a normal carbohydrate diet (NCD). Out of the 83 pregnant women, 33 of them were at high risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). In the high-risk patient group, 16 patients had an NCD intake, while 17 patients had a HCD intake. It was determined that a high carbohydrate diet had no significant effect on fasting, first-hour, and second-hour glucose levels, as well as the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), in both the unselective population and the high-risk patient population. CONCLUSION: In our study, we concluded that the high carbohydrate ratios in the diets of pregnant women one day prior did not affect the OGTT results or the GDM ratios. This indicates that there is no need for a preparatory diet prior to the OGTT in women with normal dietary habits.

Relationship between kisspeptin levels in the third trimester and late-onset fetal growth restriction: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to investigate whether maternal serum kisspeptin levels are associated with late-onset FGR and contribute to adverse perinatal outcomes. METHOD: In this case-control study, a total of 90 pregnant women admitted to the perinatology clinic were enrolled. Forty-five of them were diagnosed with FGR and 45 women with healthy pregnancies formed the control group. Maternal serum levels of kisspeptin 1 were compared. RESULTS: Median kisspeptin1 serum levels were higher in the group of patients with FGR according to gestational age than in the control group [79.4(3.9-230.2) pg/mL vs. 39.8(0.4-188.3) pg/mL; p = 0.001]. The optimal cut-off value for kisspeptin1 was 30.32 pg/mL, with a positive predictive value of 64.6% (95% CI; 0.54-0.86), negative predictive value of 87.5% (95% CI; 0.44-0.72), positive likelihood ratio 1.75 (95% CI; 1.31-2.32), negative likelihood ratio 0.14 (95% CI; 0.04-0.44). DISCUSSION: Kisspeptin1 differed significantly in late-onset FGR compared with the control group. This difference from the control group can be used to estimate late-onset FGR.

Correlation of systemic inflammation biomarkers and disease severity in pregnant women with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of whole blood parameters, systemic inflammatory indices, and systemic inflammatory markers in pregnant women with COVID-19. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the demographic, clinical, and laboratory data (i.e., whole blood parameters, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin, and D-dimer) of 464 pregnant women with COVID-19 who attended a tertiary hospital between January and April 2021 were reviewed. Systemic inflammatory indices (i.e., neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/neutrophil ratio, and systemic immune inflammation index) were calculated. Asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic pregnant women were classified as Group 1 (n=413), and those with severe disease were classified as Group 2 (n=51). RESULTS: Lymphocyte count and lymphocyte percentage in whole blood parameters were significantly lower (p<0.05), and C-reactive protein, ferritin, and procalcitonin values were higher in Group 2 (p<0.05). Systemic inflammatory indices [neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (4.7±2.9 (1.1-21.2) vs 7.5±4.7 (2.13-23.2)), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (191.1±104.3 (53.0-807.1) vs 269.5±118.9 (105.0-756.0)), systemic immune inflammation index (1,000±663 (209-5,231) vs 1,630±1,314 (345-7,006))] were found statistically significantly higher in severe disease group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Evidence in this study indicates that neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune inflammation index at first admission are simple, rapid, and inexpensive indices in predicting the prognosis of COVID-19 in pregnant women.

First trimester screening of serum advanced glycation end products levels of pregnant women who have risk factors for gestational diabetes and their obstetric outcomes: a preliminary case-control study.

Advanced glycation end-products (AGE) are complex compounds formed by nonenzymatic glycosylation of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids with glucose in the blood. We aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in first-trimester serum AGE levels of pregnant women with and without risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their obstetric outcomes. There were 44 women in study group who have risk factors for GDM and 44 as controls. Demographic features, serum AGE levels, adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups. Five patients (11.4%) in the study group and one patient (2.3%) in the control group were diagnosed as GDM (p = .2). The serum AGE values were not statistically different between the study and control groups. There were no statistical differences between groups in terms of adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes. However, in the group with adverse perinatal outcome (n = 25), AGE values were higher than the control group. The results of our preliminary study suggested that high-risk women for GDM did not have increased serum levels of AGE in the first trimester. Nevertheless, a high first-trimester serum AGE level was found to be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Advanced glycation end products (AGE) are markers that are associated with diabetes and its complications. For pregnant women, a high third trimester serum AGEs levels were found in women who had gestational diabetes.What do the results of this study add? The results of our study revealed that first trimester screening of serum AGE levels of women who had risk factors for gestational diabetes was not discriminate. Nevertheless, a high first trimester serum AGE levels was associated with adverse perinatal outcome.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Whether reducing exogenous sources of AGE (western-style diet, smoking) before pregnancy will be associated with better pregnancy outcomes should be investigated in future studies.

Comparison of the Kisspeptin levels in early onset preeclampsia and late-onset preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: Maternal Kisspeptin plays role in cell migration which is responsible for trophoblast invasion. We aimed to investigate the role of Kisspeptin as an invasion marker in the early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia cases. STUDY DESIGN: In this case-control study, 125 patients were included: 20 patients with early-onset preeclampsia and 20 gestational-age-matched healthy controls; 45 patients with late-onset preeclampsia and 40 gestational-age-matched controls). Maternal plasma Kisspeptin concentration was measured and compared in groups regarding the presence of early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. RESULTS: In the late-onset PE group, significantly higher maternal plasma Kisspeptin values were observed compared with the control group at > 34 weeks of gestation (68.7 ± 93.4 pg/ml vs 68.5 ± 57.9 pg/ml; p = 0.004). Before the 34th week of gestation, plasma Kisspeptin levels did not show a significant difference when patients with early-onset PE and gestational-age matched controls were compared (66.8 ± 87.9 pg/ml vs 48.5 ± 91.3 pg/ml; p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: Plasma Kisspeptin levels were significantly higher in women with late-onset preeclampsia, while no significant difference was observed in early-onset preeclampsia when compared with healthy gestational age-matched controls. The role of Kisspeptin proteins is still not clearly defined in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia.

Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first trimester by fasting plasma glucose which cutoff is better?

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to predict subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the first trimester. METHODS: Healthy pregnant women who were screened for GDM at 24-28 gestational weeks and had FPG levels calculated during their first antenatal visit and less than 14 gestational weeks were included in this study. RESULTS: Of the 2605 women who were recruited for the study, 245 (9.4%) were diagnosed with GDM at weeks 24-28. The diagnostic accuracy for FPG predicting GDM was 66.5, 78.4, and 88.2 for the cutoff values of 87.5 mg/dl, 92 mg/dl, and 99.5 mg/dl, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FPG values which are within the normoglycaemic range constitute an independent risk factor for the development of GDM. The threshold for gestational diabetes diagnosis must be revised.

Do fetuin-A/apha2-Heremans Schmid-glycoprotein levels have an association with recurrent pregnancy loss?

OBJECTIVE: Fetuin-A is a hepatokine which is previously found related to fertility and pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to investigate if recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is associated with increased fetuin-A levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum fetuin-A concentrations were measured and compared in 30 non-pregnant women with a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriage, 29 women who had a history of unexplained recurrent miscarriage and were admitted to our clinic due to miscarriage during the study period and 30 fertile women who have no history of miscarriage or any other pregnancy complications with at least two previous healthy children. RESULTS: The median serum fetuin-A levels of group I, II, and III were 59.45, 62.73, and 44.52, respectively (p=.065). Serum fetuin-A levels significantly increased in group II compared to group III (p=.011). No significant differences in the levels of fetuin-A of group I compared to either group II (p=.433) or group III (p=.268). CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of RPL is still a subject that is not clarified. Fetuin-A levels may have a relationship with RPL.

Newborn Hearing Screening Results of Infants Born To Mothers Who Had COVID-19 Disease During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Viral infections are known to be a risk factor for neonatal hearing loss. COVID-19 infection has been reported to affect hearing test results in one small sample sized study. We aimed to investigate the incidence the risk of neonatal hearing loss in infants of mothers who had COVID-19 infection during pregnancy, regarding their trimesters, by evaluating the neonatal hearing screening results. DESIGN: In this retrospective case-control study, neonatal hearing test results of 458 women with a history of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy were compared with 339 women who gave birth before the pandemic. Data of pregnant women who attended the COVID-19 outpatient clinic of the emergency service of a tertiary pandemic hospital and who had confirmed infection with a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test were determined from the hospital's records and their neonatal hearing screening results were analyzed from the national database. Neonates born before <34 weeks, and with reported risk factors in the database such as congenital anomaly or known TORCH infection during pregnancy were excluded. The screening tests, Automated Auditory Brainstem Response or Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission (TEOAE), were used for screening, and patients who failed the first screening were reevaluated at least 2 weeks apart with a second screening. RESULTS: The incidence of failed second screening was 1.3% in the COVID-19 group and 2.9% in controls, and no significant difference was observed between the two groups according to the final screening results on the second test. Among the 458 mothers, 8 were infected in first trimester, 126 in second trimester, 127 in third trimester but did not deliver within 15 days after infection and 197 were positive at birth. Six neonates in the infected group failed the second screening (3 [2.4%] in the second trimester, 1 [0.8%] third trimester, and 2 [1.0%] positive at birth). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was not found to be a risk factor for hearing loss, according to the newborn hearing screening results.

Management of pregnant women with COVID-19: A tertiary pandemic center experience on 1416 cases.

The aim of this study is to share the comprehensive experience of a tertiary pandemic center on pregnant women with COVID-19 and to compare clinical outcomes between pregnancy trimesters. The present prospective cohort study consisted of pregnant women with COVID-19 who were followed up at Ankara City Hospital between March 11, 2020 and February 20, 2021. Clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes were compared between the pregnancy trimesters. A total of 1416 pregnant women (1400 singletons and 16 twins) with COVID-19 were evaluated. Twenty-six (1.8%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and maternal mortality was observed in six (0.4%) cases. Pregnancy complications were present in 227 (16.1%) cases and preterm labor was the most common one (n = 42, 2.9%). There were 311, 433, and 672 patients in the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy, respectively. Rates of mild and severe/critic COVID-19 were highest in the first and second trimesters, respectively. The hospitalization rate was highest in the third trimester. Pregnancy complications, maternal mortality, and NICU admission rates were similar between the groups. The course of the disease and obstetric outcomes may be different among pregnancy trimesters. A worse course of the disease may be observed even in pregnant women without any coexisting health problems.

Is there any role of interleukin-6 and high sensitive C-reactive protein in predicting IVF/ICSI success? A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Studies have established a relationship between proinflammatory factors and implantation failure in IVF/ICSI cycles. Likewise, low-grade chronic inflammation is generally blamed for predisposing infertility. In the present study, we aimed to find a relationship between serum IL-6 and hs-CRP levels and IVF/ICSI cycle outcomes. METHODS: A total of 129 patients who consented to participate and attended the IVF unit of our department for the treatment of infertility have been enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Serum levels of high sensitive C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 have been detected at the beginning of the IVF/ICSI ovulation induction cycle. Cycle outcomes have been compared between patients with and without clinical pregnancy achievement following ART treatments. IVF/ICSI cycle outcomes of these two groups were also comparable except the number of >14 mm follicles, retrieved oocytes, metaphase II oocytes, and fertilized oocytes (2 pronuclei) which were in favor of the clinical pregnancy group. RESULTS: Mean serum hs-CRP levels were 3.08 mg/L (0.12-35.04) and 2.28 mg/L (0.09-22.52) patients with and without clinical pregnancy respectively. Mean serum IL-6 levels were 2 pg/mL (1-10.2) and 2 pg/mL (1-76.9) patients with and without clinical pregnancy respectively. Both tests were found to be statistically insignificant in predicting the success of the ART cycle in terms of implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we have not found any significant effect of hs-CRP and IL-6 levels in the IVF cycle. However, in the light of this and previous studies, large-scale research may prove the exact influence of these markers on IVF success.