Clinical outcomes and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and recently diagnosed lung cancer in oncology outpatient settings.

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and recently diagnosed lung cancer in the outpatient oncology clinic and to describe the clinical profile, management and outcomes of this population. METHODS: Among 6984 patients visited at the outpatient oncology clinics attending lung cancer patients in five university hospitals from 2017 to 2019, all consecutive subjects with recently diagnosed (<1 year) disease and AF were retrospectively selected and events in follow up were registered. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients (3.9 % of all attended, 71 ± 8 years, 91 % male) were included. Charlson, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED indexes were 6.7 ± 2.9, 2.9 ± 1.5 y 2.5 ± 1.2, respectively. Tumour stage was I, II, III and IV in 11 %, 11 %, 33 % and 45 % of them, respectively. Anticoagulants were prescribed to 226 patients (84 %): direct anticoagulants (n = 99;44 %), low molecular weight heparins (n = 69;30 %) and vitamin K antagonists (n = 58;26 %). After 46 months of maximum follow-up, 186 patients died (69 %). Cumulative incidences of events at 3 years were 3.3 ± 1.3 % for stroke/systemic embolism (n = 7); 8.9 ± 2.2 % for thrombotic events (n = 18); 9.9 ± 2.6 % for major bleeding (n = 16), and 15.9 ± 3,0 % for cardiovascular events (n = 33). In patients with early stages of cancer (I-II), 2-year mortality was significantly higher in those with cardiovascular events or major bleeding (85 % vs 25 %, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Nearly 4 % or all outpatients in the oncology clinic attending lung cancer present recently diagnosed disease and AF. Major bleeding and cardiovascular event rates are high in this population, with an impact on mortality in early stages of cancer.

Adverse Clinical Outcomes and Associated Predictors in Rivaroxaban-Treated Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Renal Impairment.

Renal impairment confers worse prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) but there is scarce evidence about the influence of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in routine clinical practice. Herein, we compared clinical outcomes between patients with AF with and without renal impairment on rivaroxaban and investigated predictors for clinical outcomes in patients with AF with renal impairment. This was a multicenter study including patients with AF on rivaroxaban for at least 6 months. During 2.5 years follow-up, ischemic strokes (IS)/transient ischemic attacks (TIA)/systemic embolisms (SE)/myocardial infarctions (MI), major bleeding, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were recorded. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault equation, renal impairment was defined as a CrCl <60 ml/min, and 1,433 patients (34.8% with CrCl <60 ml/min) were included. Patients with CrCl <60 ml/min showed higher event rates for major bleeding (1.87%/year vs 0.62%/year; p = 0.003) and MACE (1.97%/year vs 0.62%/year; p = 0.002) but similar event rates for IS/TIA/SE/MI (0.66%/year vs 0.67%/year; p = 0.955). In patients with renal impairment, CHA2DS2-VASc was associated with higher risk of IS/TIA/SE/MI; HAS-BLED and any dependency level were associated with higher risk of major bleeding; and male gender and heart failure were associated with higher risk of MACE. Antiplatelets were independently associated with increased risk of IS/TIA/SE/MI and MACE. In conclusion, in patients with AF on rivaroxaban, the incidence of IS/TIA/SE/MI did not increase in those with renal impairment, suggesting that rivaroxaban may be an effective option in this subgroup. In patients with AF, male gender, heart failure, dependency, antiplatelets, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED were associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes.

Análisis de la actividad de la consulta de enfermería telefónica a demanda para pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca / Analysis of the activity of the telephone nursing consultation on demand for patients with heart failure

Objetivo: Analizar los motivos más frecuentes de demanda telefónica en la consulta de la enfermera de insuficiencia cardiaca y evaluar la capacidad de resolución de respuesta tras la llamada. Método: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, de todas las llamadas telefónicas registradas entre junio de 2020 y abril de 2021 en una consulta específica de enfermería para la atención a la insuficiencia cardiaca. De las historias clínicas electrónicas se extrajeron las principales variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, el motivo de llamada y la acción realizada por la enfermera, para su posterior análisis descriptivo. Resultados: Se analizaron 643 llamadas, 354 (55,1%) de las cuales fueron realizadas por los pacientes. El motivo de llamada más frecuente fue para consultar síntomas: 45,8% (n=162). El 71,6% (n=116) de las consultas se solucionaron ajustando el tratamiento farmacológico por teléfono, el 24,7% (n=40) precisaron una visita presencial en la consulta de la enfermera, necesitaron atención en urgencias 22 (13,6%) pacientes: 5 por empeoramiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca. Los pacientes que consultaron por síntomas presentaban peor clase funcional (p=0,007) y habían sido derivados desde hospitalización (p=0,023). Conclusiones: La consulta telefónica se mostró útil para pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca, siendo principalmente demandada por usuarios que presentan síntomas de empeoramiento de su enfermedad.(AU)

Objective: Analyzing the most frequent reasons for telephone demand in the heart failure nurse's consultation and to evaluate the response resolution capacity after the call. Method: Descriptive, retrospective study of all telephone calls recorded between June 2020 and April 2021 in a specific nursing consultation for heart failure care. The main sociodemographic and clinical variables, reason for calling and action carried out by the nurse were extracted from the electronic medical records, for its subsequent descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 643 calls were analyzed, 354 (55.1%) were made by the patients. The most frequent reason for calling was to consult symptoms: 45.8% (n=162). 71.6% (n=116) of the consultations were resolved by adjusting the pharmacological treatment by telephone, 24.7% (n=40) required a face-to-face visit in the nurse's consultation, 22 (13.6%) needed emergency care: 5 due to worsening heart failure. The patients who consulted for symptoms had a worse functional class (P=.007) and had been referred from hospitalization (P=.023). Conclusions: The telephone consultation was shown to be useful for patients with heart failure, being mainly demanded by users who present symptoms of worsening of their disease.(AU)

Non-embolic outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease and atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban.

Aim: It is not well known how comorbidities may change the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. This study was aimed to analyze the impact of cardiovascular disease on this population. Materials & methods: EMIR was a multicenter, prospective study, including 1433 AF patients taking rivaroxaban for ≥6 months. Data were analyzed according to the presence of vascular disease. Results: Coronary artery disease was detected in 16.4%, peripheral artery disease/aortic plaque in 6.7%, vascular disease in 28.3%. Patients with coronary artery disease had higher rates (per 100 patient-years) of major adverse cardiovascular events (2.98 vs 0.71; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (1.79 vs 0.41; p = 0.004). Those with vascular disease had higher rates of thromboembolic events (1.47 vs 0.44; p = 0.007), major adverse cardiovascular events (2.03 vs 0.70; p = 0.004), and cardiovascular death (1.24 vs 0.39; p = 0.025). Patients with peripheral artery disease/aortic plaque had similar rates. Conclusion: AF patients with vascular disease have a higher risk of non-embolic outcomes.

Analysis of the activity of the telephone nursing consultation on demand for patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: Analyzing the most frequent reasons for telephone demand in the heart failure nurse's consultation and to evaluate the response resolution capacity after the call. METHOD: Descriptive, retrospective study of all telephone calls recorded between June 2020 and April 2021 in a specific nursing consultation for heart failure care. The main sociodemographic and clinical variables, reason for calling and action carried out by the nurse were extracted from the electronic medical records. For its subsequent descriptive análisis. RESULTS: 643 calls were analyzed, 354 (55.1%) were made by the patients. The most frequent reason for calling was to consult symptoms 45.8% (n = 162). 71.6% (n = 116) of the consultations were resolved by adjusting the pharmacological treatment by telephone, 24.7% (n = 40) required a face-to-face visit in the nurse's consultation, 22 (13.6%) needed emergency care. 5 due to worsening heart failure. The patients who consulted for symptoms had a worse functional class (p = 0.007) and had been referred from hospitalization (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The telephone consultation was shown to be useful for patients with heart failure, being mainly demanded by users who present symptoms of worsening of their disease.

Pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: current strategies and future directions.

INTRODUCTION: Cardioembolic stroke, associated to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), accounts for approximately one in every four strokes. Cardioembolic stroke has a bad prognosis and is associated with a significant rate of recurrence. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews current pharmacotherapeutic options for prevention of stroke in NVAF, paying special attention to their use in particular clinical settings (e.g. cardioversion, catheter ablation). We also aim to review new drug candidates that have entered clinical studies in this indication. EXPERT OPINION: Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) remains the mainstay for ischemic stroke prophylaxis in NVAF in patients at risk. Several oral (asundexian, milvexian) and parenteral (abelacimab, osocimab, xisomab, IONIS-FXIRX, fesomersen) factor XIa inhibitors are under development. These new compounds appear to be associated with a low bleeding tendency and have the potential to complement current existing alternatives for anticoagulation. However, it is also of paramount importance to implement interventions to improve adherence to available anticoagulants, which is currently suboptimal. Non-anticoagulant drugs, such as colchicine, metformin and dronedarone, also being investigated to reduce the burden of NVAF and cardioembolic stroke. Additional clinical data are needed to more clearly define the role of these drugs for stroke prevention in NVAF.

Predicting performance of the HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with Rivaroxaban: Observations from the prospective EMIR Registry.

BACKGROUND: Assessing bleeding risk during the decision-making process of starting oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is essential. Several bleeding risk scores have been proposed for vitamin K antagonist users but, few studies have focused on validation of these bleeding risk scores in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim was to compare the predictive ability of HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in AF patients taking rivaroxaban in the EMIR ('Estudio observacional para la identificación de los factores de riesgo asociados a eventos cardiovasculares mayores en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular tratados con un anticoagulante oral directo [Rivaroxaban]) Study. METHODS AND RESULTS: EMIR Study was an observational, multicenter, post-authorization, and prospective study that involved AF patients under OAC with rivaroxaban at least 6 months before enrolment. We analysed baseline clinical characteristics and adverse events after 2.5 years of follow-up and validated the predictive ability of HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores for major bleeding (MB) events.We analysed 1433 patients with mean age of 74.2 ± 9.7 (44.5% female). Mean HAS-BLED score was 1.6 ± 1.0 and ORBIT score was 1.1 ± 1.2. The ORBIT score categorised a higher proportion of patients as 'low-risk' (87.1%) compared with 53.5% using the HAS-BLED score. There were 33 MB events (1.04%/year) and 87 patients died (2.73%/year). Both HAS-BLED and ORBIT had a good predictive ability for MB{Area under the curve (AUC) 0.770, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.693-0.847; P <0.001] and AUC 0.765 (95% CI 0.672-0.858; P <0.001), respectively}. There was a non-significant difference for discriminative ability of the two tested scores (P = 0.930) and risk reclassification in terms of net reclassification improvement (NRI) -5.7 (95% CI -42.4-31.1; P = 0.762). HAS-BLED score showed the best calibration and ORBIT score showed the largest mismatch in calibration, particularly in higher predicted risk patients. CONCLUSION: In a prospective real-world AF population under rivaroxaban from EMIR registry, the HAS-BLED score had good predictive performance and calibration compared with ORBIT score for MB events. ORBIT score presented worse calibration than HAS-BLED in this DOAC treated population.

Impact of heart failure on the clinical profile and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban. Data from the EMIR study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the presence of heart failure (HF) on the clinical profile and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) anticoagulated with rivaroxaban. METHODS: Observational and non-interventional study that included AF adults recruited from 79 Spanish centers, anticoagulated with rivaroxaban ≥ 6 months before inclusion. Data were analyzed according to baseline HF status. RESULTS: Out of 1,433 patients, 326 (22.7%) had HF at baseline. Compared to patients without HF, HF patients were older (75.3 ± 9.9 vs. 73.8 ± 9.6 years; p = 0.01), had more diabetes (36.5% vs. 24.3%; p < 0.01), coronary artery disease (28.2% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.01), renal insufficiency (31.7% vs. 22.6%; p = 0.01), higher CHA2DS2-VASc (4.5 ± 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4; p < 0.01) and HAS-BLED (1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.0; p < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, among HF patients, annual rates of stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (non-fatal myocardial infarction, revascularization and cardiovascular death), cardiovascular death, and major bleeding were 1.2%, 3.0%, 2.0%, and 1.4%, respectively. Compared to those patients without HF, HF patients had greater annual rates of MACE (3.0% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.01) and cardiovascular death (2.0% vs. 0.2%; p < 0.01), without significant differences regarding other outcomes, including thromboembolic or bleeding events. Previous HF was an independent predictor of MACE (odds ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval 1.6-7.3; p = 0.002) but not for thromboembolic events or major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Among AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, HF patients had a worse clinical profile and a higher MACE risk and cardiovascular mortality. HF was independently associated with the development of MACE, but not with thromboembolic events or major bleeding.

Rivaroxaban for the prevention of outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: an indirect comparison of national and international registries.

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: The clinical profile and outcomes of the EMIR study were indirectly compared with those of ROCKET-AF, eight other Spanish observational studies and XANTUS. Results: In EMIR, mean age was 74.2 years and CHA2DS2-VASc was 3.5. In the rivaroxaban arm of the ROCKET-AF trial, mean age was 73 years and CHADS2 was 3.5, whereas in the Spanish studies mean age ranged from 74.9 years to 78.4 years and CHA2DS2-VASc from 3.5 to 4.3. In EMIR, rates of stroke/systemic embolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death and major bleeding were 0.57, 1.07, 0.63 and 1.04 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In ROCKET-AF, these numbers were 1.7, 3.91, 1.53 and 3.6 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In the Spanish studies, rates of stroke and major bleeding were 0-1.8 and 0.22-4.2 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In XANTUS, rates of stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding were 0.7, 1.8 and 2.1 events/100 patient-years, respectively. Conclusion: Despite the fact that rivaroxaban is prescribed for elderly patients with a high thromboembolic risk, rates of outcomes remain low.

Outcomes and predictive value of the 2MACE score in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban in a prospective, multicenter observational study: The EMIR study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the 2MACE in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with rivaroxaban and to improve the accuracy of 2MACE. METHODS: This was a post-authorization and observational study of AF adults treated with rivaroxaban for ≥ 6 months. The primary endpoint was any of the major adverse cardiac events (MACE), namely, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and myocardial revascularization. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the performance of 2MACE, and a new score, 2MACER to predict MACE. RESULTS: A total of 1433 patients were included (74.2 ± 9.7 years, CHA2DS2-VASc 3.5 ± 1.5, 26.9% 2MACE ≥ 3). The annual event rates (follow-up 2.5 years) were 1.07% for MACE, 0.66% for thromboembolic events and 1.04% for major bleeding. Patients with 2MACE ≥ 3 (vs. < 3) had higher risk of stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack (odds ratio [OR] 5.270; 95% CI 2.216-12.532), major bleeding (OR 4.624; 95% CI 2.163-9.882), MACE (OR 3.202; 95% CI 1.548-6.626) and cardiovascular death (OR 3.395; 95% CI 1.396-8.259). 2MACE was recalculated giving 1 more point to patients with baseline a glomerular filtration rate < 50 mL/min/1.73 m² (2MACER); 2MACER vs. 2MACE: IDI 0.1%, p = 0.126; NRI 23.9%, p = 0.125; AUC: 0.651 (95% CI 0.547-0.755) vs. 0.638 (95% CI 0.534-0.742), respectively; p = 0.361. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban exhibit a low risk of events. 2MACE score acts as a modest predictor of a higher risk of adverse outcomes in this population. 2MACER did not significantly increase the ability of 2MACE to predict MACE.

Use of rivaroxaban attenuates renal function impairment in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights of the EMIR study.

BACKGROUND: In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients on vitamin K antagonists, a progressive deterioration of renal function is common but there is limited evidence with long-term use of rivaroxaban. Herein, we investigated the change in renal function in AF patients after 2 years of rivaroxaban treatment. METHODS: The EMIR registry is an observational and multicentre study including AF patients treated with rivaroxaban for at least 6 months prior to inclusion. Changes in analytical parameters were recorded during 2 years of follow-up. Renal function was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault equation. RESULTS: 1433 patients (638, 44.5% women, mean age of 74.2 ± 9.7 years) were included. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was available at baseline and at 2 years in 1085 patients. At inclusion, 33.2% of patients had impaired renal function (CrCl <60 ml/min). At 2 years, we were not able to find changes in the proportion of patients with impaired renal function, which increased to 34.6% (p = 0.290). However, the baseline mean CrCl was 76.0 ± 30.5 ml/min and slightly improved at 2 years (77.0 ± 31.8 ml/min; p = 0.014). Overall, the proportion of patients with CrCl <60 ml/min at baseline that had CrCl ≥60 ml/min at 2 years was significantly higher compared to that of patients with CrCl ≥60 ml/min at baseline and CrCl <60 ml/min after (22.2% vs. 13.1%; p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: In AF patients on long-term rivaroxaban therapy, a decrease in renal function was not observed. We even observed a slight improvement in the patients with renal impairment. These results reinforce the idea that rivaroxaban may be a safe option even in patients with renal impairment.

Characterization of atrial fibrillation in real-world patients: testing the 4S-AF scheme in the Spanish and French cohorts of the EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry.

AIMS: The 4S-AF scheme [Stroke risk, Symptom severity, Severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, Substrate severity] has recently been described as a novel approach to in-depth characterization of AF. We aim to determine if the 4S-AF scheme would be useful for AF characterization and provides prognostic information in real-world AF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Spanish and French cohorts of the EORP-AF Long-Term General Registry were included. The baseline 4S-AF scheme was calculated and related to the primary management strategy (rhythm or rate control). Follow-up was performed at 1-year with all-cause mortality and the composite of ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death, as primary endpoints. A total of 1479 patients [36.9% females, median age 72 interquartile range (IQR 64-80) years] were included. The median 4S-AF scheme score was 5 (IQR 4-7). The 4S-AF scheme, as continuous and as categorical, was associated with the management strategy decided for the patient (both P < 0.001). The predictive performances of the 4S-AF scheme for the actual management strategy were appropriate in its continuous [c-index 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.80] and categorical (c-index 0.75, 95% CI 0.72-0.78) forms. Cox regression analyses showed that 'red category' classified patients in the 4S-AF scheme had a higher risk of all-cause death (aHR 1.75, 95% CI 1.02-2.99) and composite outcomes (aHR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05-2.44). CONCLUSION: Characterization of AF by using the 4S-AF scheme may aid in identifying AF patients that would be managed by rhythm or rate control and could also help in identifying high-risk AF patients for worse clinical outcomes in a 'real-world' setting.

Antithrombotic therapy and clinical outcomes at 1 year in the Spanish cohort of the EORP-AF Long-term General Registry.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of thromboembolism. We investigate the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy and explored the number needed to treat for net effect (NNTnet) of OAC in the Spanish cohort of the EURObservational Research Programme-AF (EORP-AF) Long-term General Registry. METHODS: The EORP-AF General Registry is a prospective, multicentre registry conducted in ESC countries, including consecutive AF patients. For the present analysis, we used the Spanish cohort, and the primary outcome was any thromboembolism (TE)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS)/cardiovascular death during the first year of follow-up. RESULTS: 729 AF patients were included (57.1% male, median age 75 [IQR 67-81] years, median CHA2 DS2 -VASc and HAS-BLED of 3 [IQR 2-5] and 2 [IQR 1-2], respectively). 548 (75.2%) patients received OAC alone (318 [43.6%] on VKAs and 230 [31.6%] on DOACs). After 1 year, the use of OAC alone showed lower rates of any TE/ACS/cardiovascular death (3.0%/year; p < 0.001) compared to other regimens, and non-use of OAC alone (HR 4.18, 95% CI 2.12-8.27) was independently associated with any TE/ACS/cardiovascular death. Balancing the effects of treatment, the NNTnet to provide an overall benefit of OAC therapy was 24. The proportion of patients on OAC increased at 1 year (87% to 88.1%), particularly on DOACs (33.6% to 39.9%) (p = 0.015), with low discontinuation rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary cohort of AF patients, OAC therapy was associated with better clinical outcomes at 1 year and positive NNTnet. OAC use slightly increased during the follow-up, with low discontinuation rates and higher prescription of DOACs.

Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation-related ischemic stroke and its association with DOAC uptake in Spain: first national population-based study 2005 to 2018.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), a major risk factor for stroke, has increased substantially in the past few years. However, several studies have reported a decline in AF-related stroke rates associated with higher uptake of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This ecological study evaluated the association between DOAC uptake in Spain and the incidence rate (IR) of AF-related ischemic stroke. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Registry of Activity of Specialized Healthcare of the Spanish Ministry of Health (RAE-MDS). AF-related ischemic strokes were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. IR were age-standardized and adjusted to the 2013 European standard population. Poisson regression models were used to identify the association between DOAC uptake and AF-related ischemic stroke in patients aged ≥ 65 years. RESULTS: Before the use of DOACs, the adjusted IR of AF-related ischemic stroke increased steadily from 2005 (IR=2.20 per 100 000 person/y) to 2012 (IR=2.67). Upon DOAC uptake in Spain from 2012 onwards for AF-related ischemic stroke prevention, the IR remained constant or decreased slightly (IR in 2018=2.66). Poisson regression showed that DOAC uptake was a significant predictor for the rate of AF-related ischemic stroke in patients older than 65 years (IRR=0.995; 95%CI, 0.995-0.996). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an association between DOAC use and a reduced incidence of AF-related ischemic stroke. While this association is based on aggregate data and cannot demonstrate causality, these findings suggest that higher DOAC uptake could improve health outcomes in AF patients in Spain.

Factores de predicción de dosificación inadecuada de rivaroxabán utilizando la ecuación de CKD-EPI / Rivaroxaban Inappropriate Dosage Predictor Factors Using The Ckd-Epi Equation

No disponible

Recomendaciones de expertos en la mejora de la prevención efectiva del ictus isquémico en la fibrilación auricular no valvular: papel del rivaroxabán / Expert recommendations on improving effective ischemic stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the role of rivaroxaban

La fibrilación auricular aumenta de manera marcada el riesgo de ictus isquémico. A pesar de que los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK) reducen ese riesgo, tienen una eficacia limitada y numerosos inconvenientes que han hecho que durante años hubiese una proporción importante de pacientes con fibrilación auricular no anticoagulados. En cambio, no solo los ensayos clínicos, sino también los estudios en práctica clínica real y últimamente los estudios poblacionales, han demostrado que los anticoagulantes orales de acción directa (ACOD) tienen más eficacia y seguridad y un mejor beneficio clínico neto que los AVK. De hecho, en las regiones donde la prescripción de ACOD es mayor, está disminuyendo la incidencia de ictus isquémico, además de los costes generales asociados con la fibrilación auricular. A pesar de que en los últimos años ha aumentado la prescripción de ACOD, España es de los países con menores tasas de prescripción de toda Europa, lo que podría asociarse con mayores tasas de ictus isquémico. A pesar de que todas las guías posicionan los ACOD como de primera elección frente a los AVK para los pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular, en España, debido a las restricciones impuestas por el informe de posicionamiento terapéutico, con necesidad de visado, y también por la inercia terapéutica, es mayor la prescripción de AVK. Son necesarias medidas inmediatas para corregir esta situación, y así mejorar el pronóstico de nuestros pacientes

Atrial fibrillation markedly increases the risk of ischemic stroke. Although vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) reduce this risk, they have limited efficacy and several disadvantages, which has meant that over the years a substantial proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation have remained without anticoagulation. In contrast, clinical trials, studies in routine clinical practice and, more recently, population-based studies have all demonstrated that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are more effective and safer than VKAs and also have a greater net clinical benefit. In fact, in regions where the DOAC prescription rate is high, the incidence of ischemic stroke has decreased, as have the overall costs associated with atrial fibrillation. Although the prescription of DOACs in Spain has increased in recent years, the country has one of the lowest prescription rates in Europe, which may be associated with a higher incidence of ischemic stroke. Despite clinical guidelines all recommending that DOACs should be used in preference to VKAs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, more prescriptions are issued for VKAs in Spain, largely due to restrictions imposed by national statements on appropriate medicine use (including the need for approval), but also because of therapeutic inertia. Immediate action should be taken to correct this situation and to improve patients' prognoses

Anticoagulantes orales directos frente a antagonistas de la vitamina K en pacientes con fibrilación auricular de la práctica clínica: revisión sistemática y metanálisis / Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introducción y objetivos: Determinar la efectividad de los anticoagulantes orales directos frente a los antagonistas de la vitamina K en pacientes con fibrilación auricular de la práctica clínica. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática acorde con los estándares metodológicos de Cochrane. Los resultados de la revisión se publicaron según la declaración PRISMA. Se empleó la herramienta ROBINS-I para determinar el riesgo de sesgos. Resultados: Se incluyeron datos de 27 estudios diferentes provenientes de 30 publicaciones. En los estudios con seguimiento hasta 1 año, el apixabán (HR = 0,93; IC95%, 0,71-1,20) y dabigatrán (HR = 0,95; IC95%, 0,80-1,13) no se redujo significativamente el riesgo de ictus isquémico frente a la warfarina, pero sí el rivaroxabán (HR = 0,83; IC95%, 0,73-0,94). Con respecto al riesgo de hemorragias mayores, el apixabán (HR = 0,66; IC95%, 0,55-0,80) y el dabigatrán (HR = 0,83; IC95%, 0,70-0,97) lo redujeron significativamente frente a la warfarina, pero no el rivaroxabán (HR = 1,02, IC95%, 0,95-1,10), aunque con heterogeneidad entre los estudios. El apixabán (HR = 0,56; IC95%, 0,42-0,73), el dabigatrán (HR = 0,45; IC95%, 0,39-0,51) y el rivaroxabán (HR = 0,66; IC95%, 0,49-0,88) redujeron significativamente el riesgo de hemorragia intracraneal frente a la warfarina. El empleo de dosis bajas de anticoagulantes orales directos se asoció con una ligera mejoría del perfil de seguridad, pero con una marcada reducción de la efectividad en la prevención de ictus. Conclusiones: Los resultados de este metanálisis indican que, en comparación con la warfarina, la efectividad para prevenir el riesgo de ictus y de hemorragias de los anticoagulantes orales directos en los pacientes con fibrilación auricular de la práctica clínica real puede ser diferente

Introduction and objectives: To assess the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to Cochrane methodological standards. The results were reported according to the PRISMA statement. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias. Results: A total of 27 different studies publishing data in 30 publications were included. In the studies with a follow-up up to 1 year, apixaban (HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.71-1.20) and dabigatran (HR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.80-1.13) did not significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke vs warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban significantly reduced this risk (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.73-0.94). Apixaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.55-0.80) and dabigatran (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.70-0.97) significantly reduced the major bleeding risk vs warfarin, but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.95-1.10), although with a high statistical heterogeneity among studies. Apixaban (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.42-0.73), dabigatran (HR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.39-0.51), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.49-0.88) significantly reduced the risk of intracranial bleeding vs warfarin. Reduced doses of direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a slightly better safety profile, but with a marked reduction in stroke prevention effectiveness. Conclusions: Data from this meta-analysis suggest that, vs warfarin, the stroke prevention effectiveness and bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants may differ in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation