Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays and prospective comparison with genome sequencing.

Omicron has become the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant globally since December 2021, with distinct waves being associated with separate Omicron sublineages. Rapid detection of BA.1, BA.2, BA.4, and BA.5 was accomplished in the province of Alberta, Canada, through the design and implementation of real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays targeting S:N501Y, S:ins214EPE, S:H69/V70, ORF7b:L11F, and M:D3N. Using the combination of results for each of these markers, samples could be designated as belonging to sublineages within BA.1, BA.2, BA.4, or BA.5. The analytical sensitivity of these markers ranged from 132 to 2229 copies/mL and in-laboratory accuracy was 98.9-100%. A 97.3% agreement using 12,592 specimens was demonstrated for the assays compared to genome sequencing. The use of these assays, combined with genome sequencing, facilitated the surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 lineages throughout a BA.5-dominated period.

Retrospective testing for the presence of monkeypox virus in a high-risk population from February-June 2022 in Alberta, Canada.

Background: A multi-country outbreak of monkeypox virus (MPXV) infections was identified by the World Health Organization in May 2022. The western Canadian province of Alberta identified its first case of MPXV in a returning traveller on June 2, 2022. We undertook a retrospective testing exercise to evaluate whether MPXV may have been circulating in the province earlier. Methods: Skin (genital and non-genital) and mucosal lesion swabs submitted for herpes simplex virus (HSV)/varicella zoster virus (VZV)/syphilis testing from male patients attending sexually-transmitted infection clinics across the province of Alberta from January 28 to May 30, 2022 were retrieved from storage. The population tested was selected based on the epidemiology of the current 2022 multi-country MPXV outbreak. Samples underwent viral nucleic acid extraction and testing for the presence of Orthopoxvirus DNA using a commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit. Results: A total of 392 samples (representing 341 unique individuals of median age 31 years) were retrieved. Of them, 349 (89.0%) samples were submitted for HSV/VZV/syphilis testing, 13 (3.3%) for HSV/VZV only, and 30 (7.7%) for syphilis PCR only. None of the 392 samples tested were found to be positive for Orthopoxvirus DNA. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that circulation of MPXV in a higher-risk population in Alberta, prior to the first case, was less likely. We recommend that other provinces/territories review their local epidemiology, context and resources prior to conducting similar studies.

Historique: En mai 2022, l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé a déclaré une flambée multinationale d'infection par le virus de la variole simienne (MPXV). Le 2 juin 2022, la province de l'Alberta, dans l'Ouest canadien, a recensé son premier cas de MPXV chez un voyageur de retour de l'étranger. Les chercheurs ont entrepris un exercice de dépistage rétrospectif pour évaluer la possibilité que le MPXV ait circulé auparavant dans la province. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont extrait de l'entreposage les écouvillons des lésions cutanées (génitales et non génitales) et muqueuses soumis en vue de dépister le virus herpès simplex (VHS), le virus varicelle-zona (VZV) et le virus de la syphilis des patients de sexe masculin qui avaient fréquenté les cliniques d'infections transmises sexuellement de la province de l'Alberta entre le 28 janvier et le 30 mai 2022. Ils ont sélectionné la population soumise au dépistage en fonction de l'épidémiologie de la flambée multinationale de MPXV en 2022. Les écouvillons ont été soumis à l'extraction et au test des acides nucléiques viraux pour dépister la présence d'ADN de l'Orthopoxvirus au moyen d'un test commercial d'amplification en chaîne par polymérase (PCR). RÉsultats: Les chercheurs ont extrait un total de 392 échantillons (représentant 341 personnes uniques d'un âge médian de 31 ans). De ce nombre, 349 (89,0 %) avaient été soumis au test PCR du VHS, du VZV et de la syphilis, 13 (3,3 %), du VHS et du VZV seulement et 30 (7,7 %), de la syphilis seulement. Aucun des 392 échantillons n'a donné de résultat positif à l'ADN de l'Orthopoxvirus. Conclusions: D'après les résultats de la présente étude, il est peu probable que le MPXV ait circulé dans la population plus vulnérable de l'Alberta avant la détection du premier cas. Les chercheurs recommandent que les autres provinces et territoires examinent leur épidémiologie locale, le contexte et les ressources avant de procéder à des études de ce type.

Patient and ward related risk factors in a multi-ward nosocomial outbreak of COVID-19: Outbreak investigation and matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19 outbreaks continue to evolve. The aim of this study was to investigate a multi-ward nosocomial outbreak of COVID-19 between 1st September and 15th November 2020, occurring in a setting without vaccination for any healthcare workers or patients. METHODS: Outbreak report and retrospective, matched case-control study using incidence density sampling in three cardiac wards in an 1100-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Patients were confirmed/probable COVID-19 cases and contemporaneous control patients without COVID-19. COVID-19 outbreak definitions were based on Public Health guidelines. Clinical and environmental specimens were tested by RT-PCR and as applicable quantitative viral cultures and whole genome sequencing were conducted. Controls were inpatients on the cardiac wards during the study period confirmed to be without COVID-19, matched to outbreak cases by time of symptom onset dates, age within ± 15 years and were admitted in hospital for at least 2 days. Demographics, Braden Score, baseline medications, laboratory measures, co-morbidities, and hospitalization characteristics were collected on cases and controls. Univariate and multivariate conditional logistical regression was used to identify independent risk factors for nosocomial COVID-19. RESULTS: The outbreak involved 42 healthcare workers and 39 patients. The strongest independent risk factor for nosocomial COVID-19 (IRR 3.21, 95% CI 1.47-7.02) was exposure in a multi-bedded room. Of 45 strains successfully sequenced, 44 (97.8%) were B.1.128 and differed from the most common circulating community lineages. SARS-CoV-2 positive cultures were detected in 56.7% (34/60) of clinical and environmental specimens. The multidisciplinary outbreak team observed eleven contributing events to transmission during the outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Transmission routes of SARS-CoV-2 in hospital outbreaks are complex; however multi-bedded rooms play a significant role in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Respiratory virus coinfections with severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continue to be rare one year into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Alberta, Canada (June 2020-May 2021).

To assess the burden of respiratory virus coinfections with severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), this study reviewed 4,818 specimens positive for SARS-CoV-2 and tested using respiratory virus multiplex testing. Coinfections with SARS-CoV-2 were uncommon (2.8%), with enterovirus or rhinovirus as the most prevalent target (88.1%). Respiratory virus coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 remains low 1 year into the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Evolving strategy for an evolving virus: Development of real-time PCR assays for detecting all SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

In order to detect the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs), five real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) assays were designed to target the critical discriminatory mutations responsible for the following amino acid changes in the spike protein: two Δ69-70 + N501Y + E gene triplexes (one optimized for Alpha [B.1.1.7] and one optimized for Omicron [B.1.1.529]), a K417N + 242-244 wild-type duplex, a K417T + E484K duplex, and a L452R + P681 + E484Q triplex. Depending on the assay, sensitivity was 98.97-100% for the detection of known VOC-positive samples, specificity was 97.2-100%, limit of detection was 2-116 copies/reaction, intra- and interassay variability was less than 5%, and no cross-reactivity with common respiratory pathogens was observed with any assay. A subset of rRT-PCR- positive VOC samples were further characterized by genome sequencing. A comparison of the lineage designation by the VOC rRT-PCR assays and genome sequencing for the detection of the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron variants showed clinical sensitivities of 99.97-100 %, clinical specificities of 99.6-100 %, positive predictive values of 99.8-100%, and negative predictive values of 99.98-100 %. We have implemented these rRT-PCR assays targeting discriminatory single nucleotide polymorphisms for ongoing VOC screening of SARS-CoV-2 positive samples for surveillance purposes. This has proven extremely useful in providing close to real-time molecular surveillance to monitor the emergence of Alpha, the replacement of Alpha by Delta, and the replacement of Delta by Omicron. While the design, validation and implementation of the variant specific PCR targets is an ever-evolving approach, we find the turn-around-time, high throughput and sensitivity to be a useful complementary approach for SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing for surveillance purposes in the province of Alberta, Canada.

Detection and quantification of infectious severe acute respiratory coronavirus-2 in diverse clinical and environmental samples.

To explore the potential modes of Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission, we collected 535 diverse clinical and environmental samples from 75 infected hospitalized and community patients. Infectious SARS-CoV-2 with quantitative burdens varying from 5 plaque-forming units/mL (PFU/mL) up to 1.0 × 106 PFU/mL was detected in 151/459 (33%) of the specimens assayed and up to 1.3 × 106 PFU/mL on fomites with confirmation by plaque morphology, PCR, immunohistochemistry, and/or sequencing. Infectious virus in clinical and associated environmental samples correlated with time since symptom onset with no detection after 7-8 days in immunocompetent hosts and with N-gene based Ct values ≤ 25 significantly predictive of yielding plaques in culture. SARS-CoV-2 isolated from patient respiratory tract samples caused illness in a hamster model with a minimum infectious dose of ≤ 14 PFU. Together, our findings offer compelling evidence that large respiratory droplet and contact (direct and indirect i.e., fomites) are important modes of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

One Swab Fits All: Performance of a Rapid, Antigen-Based SARS-CoV-2 Test Using a Nasal Swab, Nasopharyngeal Swab for Nasal Collection, and RT-PCR Confirmation from Residual Extraction Buffer.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests have great potential to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic. In the performance of a rapid, antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 test (RAT), our study had 3 main objectives: to determine the accuracy of nasal swabs, the accuracy of using nasopharyngeal swabs for nasal collection (nasalNP), and the effectiveness of using residual extraction buffer for real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) confirmation of positive RAT (rPan). METHODS: Symptomatic adults recently diagnosed with COVID-19 in the community were recruited into the study. Nasal samples were collected using either a nasalNP or nasal swab and tested immediately with the RAT in the individual's home by a health care provider. 500 µL of universal transport media was added to the residual extraction buffer after testing and sent to the laboratory for SARS-CoV-2 testing using RT-PCR. Parallel throat swabs tested with RT-PCR were used as the reference comparators. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five individuals were included in the study (99 nasal swabs, 56 nasalNP). Sensitivities of nasal samples tested on the RAT using either nasal or nasalNP were 89.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 80.7%-94.6%] and 90.2% (95% CI 78.6%-96.7%), respectively. rPan positivity agreement compared to throat RT-PCR was 96.2%. CONCLUSIONS: RAT reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 from symptomatic adults in the community presenting within 7 days of symptom onset using nasal swabs or nasalNP. High agreement with rPan can avoid the need for collecting a second swab for RT-PCR confirmation or testing of variants of concern from positive RAT in this population.

Effect of not vortexing nasopharyngeal and throat swabs on SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection: A pilot study.

The processing of swabs for respiratory virus detection involves vortexing while still in the viral transport medium (VTM). The effect of not vortexing swabs prior to analysis has not been studied extensively for SARS-CoV-2 detection, and presents an opportunity to improve pre-analytic laboratory workflow. We aimed to assess the impact of not vortexing nasopharyngeal/throat swabs submitted in VTM for SARS-CoV-2 testing. To assess the impact of not vortexing swabs, 277 swab samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in paired vortexed and non-vortexed aliquots using eight routine nucleic acid amplification assays. We compared the qualitative (positive/negative) and semi-quantitative (cycle threshold, Ct) results. Following discordant analysis, all but one non-vortexed sample had the same qualitative result as the vortexed sample. 27.4 % of samples were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Comparison of Ct values revealed an apparent reduction in human cellular nucleic acid in the non-vortexed samples (mean Ct values of 24.0 and 26.5 for vortexed and non-vortexed samples, respectively, p < 0.0001) and increased Ct values for non-vortexed samples using a laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 assay (mean Ct values of 4.1 and 4.2 for vortexed and non-vortexed samples, respectively; p < 0.0001), but this was not observed for a more automated commercial SARS-CoV-2 assay (mean Ct values of 15.2 for both vortexed and non-vortexed samples, respectively; p = 0.68). While vortexing swabs appears to improve the recovery of cellular material, it does not have an appreciable impact on the qualitative sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests, which may support omission of this step and simplification of front-end sample processing.

Validating and optimizing the method for molecular detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater.

Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 has become a promising tool to estimate population-level changes in community infections and the prevalence of COVID-19 disease. Although many studies have reported the detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater, remarkable variation remains in the methodology. In this study, we validated a molecular testing method by concentrating viruses from wastewater using ultrafiltration and detecting SARS-CoV-2 using one-step RT-qPCR assay. The following parameters were optimized including sample storage condition, wastewater pH, RNA extraction and RT-qPCR assay by quantification of SARS-CoV-2 or spiked human coronavirus strain 229E (hCoV-229E). Wastewater samples stored at 4 °C after collection showed significantly enhanced detection of SARS-CoV-2 with approximately 2-3 PCR-cycle threshold (Ct) values less when compared to samples stored at -20 °C. Pre-adjustment of the wastewater pH to 9.6 to aid virus desorption followed by pH readjustment to neutral after solid removal significantly increased the recovery of spiked hCoV-229E. Of the five commercially available RNA isolation kits evaluated, the MagMAX-96 viral RNA isolation kit showed the best recovery of hCoV-229E (50.1 ± 20.1%). Compared with two-step RT-qPCR, one-step RT-qPCR improved sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Salmon DNA was included for monitoring PCR inhibition and pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), a fecal indicator indigenous to wastewater, was used to normalize SARS-CoV-2 levels in wastewater. Our method for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater provides a useful tool for public health surveillance of COVID-19.

Characterization of Swine Influenza A(H1N2) Variant, Alberta, Canada, 2020.

Influenza strains circulating among swine populations can cause outbreaks in humans. In October 2020, we detected a variant influenza A subtype H1N2 of swine origin in a person in Alberta, Canada. We initiated a public health, veterinary, and laboratory investigation to identify the source of the infection and determine whether it had spread. We identified the probable source as a local pig farm where a household contact of the index patient worked. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolate closely resembled strains found at that farm in 2017. Retrospective and prospective surveillance using molecular testing did not identify any secondary cases among 1,532 persons tested in the surrounding area. Quick collaboration between human and veterinary public health practitioners in this case enabled a rapid response to a potential outbreak.

SARS-COV-2 recombinant Receptor-Binding-Domain (RBD) induces neutralizing antibodies against variant strains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1.

SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological agent of COVID19. There are currently several licensed vaccines approved for human use and most of them target the spike protein in the virion envelope to induce protective immunity. Recently, variants that spread more quickly have emerged. There is evidence that some of these variants are less sensitive to neutralization in vitro, but it is not clear whether they can evade vaccine induced protection. In this study, we tested SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD as a vaccine antigen and explored the effect of formulation with Alum/MPLA or AddaS03 adjuvants. Our results show that RBD induces high titers of neutralizing antibodies and activates strong cellular immune responses. There is also significant cross-neutralization of variants B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 and to a lesser extent, SARS-CoV-1. These results indicate that recombinant RBD can be a viable candidate as a stand-alone vaccine or as a booster shot to diversify our strategy for COVID19 protection.

Integrating Reverse Transcription Recombinase Polymerase Amplification with CRISPR Technology for the One-Tube Assay of RNA.

CRISPR-Cas systems integrated with nucleic acid amplification techniques improve both analytical specificity and sensitivity. We describe here issues and solutions for the successful integration of reverse transcription (RT), recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), and CRISPR-Cas12a nuclease reactions into a single tube under an isothermal condition (40 °C). Specific detection of a few copies of a viral DNA sequence was achieved in less than 20 min. However, the sensitivity was orders of magnitude lower for the detection of viral RNA due to the slow initiation of RPA when the complementary DNA (cDNA) template remained hybridized to RNA. During the delay of RPA, the crRNA-Cas12a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) gradually lost its activity in the RPA solution, and nonspecific amplification reactions consumed the RPA reagents. We overcame these problems by taking advantage of the endoribonuclease function of RNase H to remove RNA from the RNA-cDNA hybrids and free the cDNA as template for the RPA reaction. As a consequence, we significantly enhanced the overall reaction rate of an integrated assay using RT-RPA and CRISPR-Cas12a for the detection of RNA. We showed successful detection of 200 or more copies of the S gene sequence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA within 5-30 min. We applied our one-tube assay to 46 upper respiratory swab samples for COVID-19 diagnosis, and the results from both fluorescence intensity measurements and end-point visualization were consistent with those of RT-qPCR analysis. The strategy and technique improve the sensitivity and speed of RT-RPA and CRISPR-Cas12a assays, potentially useful for both semi-quantitative and point-of-care analyses of RNA molecules.

Precision Response to the Rise of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 Variant of Concern by Combining Novel PCR Assays and Genome Sequencing for Rapid Variant Detection and Surveillance.

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) have emerged as a global threat to the COVID-19 pandemic response. We implemented a combined approach to quickly detect known VOCs while continuously monitoring for evolving mutations of the virus. To rapidly detect VOCs, two real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays were designed and implemented, targeting the spike gene H69/V70 deletion and the N501Y mutation. The H69/V70 deletion and N501Y mutation assays demonstrated accuracies of 98.3% (95% CI 93.8 to 99.8) and 100% (95% CI 96.8 to 100), limits of detection of 1,089 and 294 copies/ml, and percent coefficients of variation of 0.08 to 1.16% and 0 to 2.72% for the two gene targets, respectively. No cross-reactivity with common respiratory pathogens was observed with either assay. Implementation of these tests allowed the swift escalation in testing for VOCs from 2.2% to ∼100% of all SARS-CoV-2-positive samples over 12 January to 9 February 2021, and resulted in the detection of a rapid rise of B.1.1.7 cases within the province of Alberta, Canada. A prospective comparison of the VOC assays to genome sequencing for the detection of B.1.1.7, combined detection of P.1 and B.1.351, and wild-type (i.e., non-VOC) lineages showed sensitivities of 98.2 to 100%, specificities of 98.9 to 100%, positive predictive values of 76.9% to 100%, and negative predictive values of 96 to 100%. Variant screening results inform sampling strategies for regular surveillance by genome sequencing, thus allowing rapid identification of known VOCs while continuously monitoring the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in the province. IMPORTANCE Different strains, or variants, of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19) have emerged that have higher levels of transmission, less susceptibility to our immune response, and possibly cause more severe disease than previous strains of the virus. Rapid detection of these variants of concern is important to help contain them and prevent them from spreading widely within the population. This study describes two newly developed tests that are able to identify and differentiate the variants of concern from regular strains of SARS-CoV-2. These tests are faster and simpler than the main, gold standard method of identifying variants of concern (genome sequencing). These tests also demonstrated a high correlation with genome sequencing and allowed for the rapid and accurate detection of the rise of B.1.1.7 (one of the variants of concern) in the province of Alberta, Canada.

Acceptable performance of the Abbott ID NOW among symptomatic individuals with confirmed COVID-19.

Introduction. The ID NOW is FDA approved for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals within the first 7 days of symptom onset for COVID-19 if tested within 1 h of specimen collection.Gap statement. Clinical data on the performance of the ID NOW are limited, with many studies varying in their study design and/or having small sample size.Aim. In this study we aimed to determine the clinical performance of the ID NOW compared to conventional RT-PCR testing.Methodology. Adults with COVID-19 in the community or hospital were recruited into the study. Paired throat swabs were collected, with one throat swab transported immediately in an empty sterile tube to the laboratory for ID NOW testing, and the other transported in universal transport media and tested by an in-house SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay targeting the E gene.Results. In total, 133 individuals were included in the study; 129 samples were positive on either the ID NOW and/or RT-PCR. Assuming any positive result on either assay represents a true positive, positive per cent agreement (PPA) of the ID NOW compared to RT-PCR with 95 % confidence intervals was 89.1 % (82.0-94.1%) and 91.6 % (85.1-95.9%), respectively. When analysing individuals with symptom duration ≤7 days and who had the ID NOW performed within 1 h (n=62), ID NOW PPA increased to 98.2 %.Conclusion. Results from the ID NOW were reliable, especially when adhering to the manufacturer's recommendations for testing.

Development and validation of a multiplex reverse transcriptase-PCR assay for simultaneous testing of influenza A, influenza B and SARS-CoV-2.

In the current pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the co-circulation of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses during the upcoming fall and winter seasons may present an unprecedented burden of respiratory disease in the population. Important respiratory viruses that will need to be closely monitored during this time include SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and influenza B. The epidemiology of these viruses is very similar in terms of susceptible populations, mode of transmission, and the clinical syndromes, thus the etiological agent will be difficult to differentiate without target specific assays. The availability of a sensitive and specific multiplex assay that can simultaneously detect all these targets will be valuable. Here we report the validation of a real-time reverse transciptase-PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and influenza B. This multiplex assay is comparable to its singleplex counterparts with a limit-of-detection being less than 5 copies/reaction, 100 % specificity, over seven logs of dynamic range, less than 1 % coefficientof variation showing high precision, and equivalent accuracy using patient samples. It also offers the added benefits of savings in reagents and technologist time while improving testing efficiency and turn-around-times in order to respond effectively to the ongoing pandemic.

Clinical performance of the Abbott Panbio with nasopharyngeal, throat, and saliva swabs among symptomatic individuals with COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests used at the point-of-care, such as the Abbott Panbio, have great potential to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic. The Panbio is Health Canada approved for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals within the first 7 days of COVID-19 symptom onset(s). Symptomatic adults recently diagnosed with COVID-19 in the community were recruited into the study. Paired nasopharyngeal (NP), throat, and saliva swabs were collected, with one paired swab tested immediately with the Panbio, and the other transported in universal transport media and tested using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We also prospectively evaluated results from assessment centers within the community. For those individuals, an NP swab was collected for Panbio testing and paired with RT-PCR results from parallel NP or throat swabs. One hundred and forty-five individuals were included in the study. Collection of throat and saliva was stopped early due to poorer performance (throat sensitivity 57.7%, n=61, and saliva sensitivity 2.6%, n=41). NP swab sensitivity was 87.7% [n=145, 95% confidence interval (CI) 81.0-92.7%]. There were 1641 symptomatic individuals tested by Panbio in assessment centers with 268/1641 (16.3%) positive for SARS-CoV-2. There were 37 false negatives and 2 false positives, corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 86.1% [95% CI 81.3-90.0%] and 99.9% [95% CI 99.5-100.0%], respectively. The Panbio test reliably detects most cases of SARS-CoV-2 from adults in the community setting presenting within 7 days of symptom onset using nasopharyngeal swabs. Throat and saliva swabs are not reliable specimens for the Panbio.

False negative rate of COVID-19 PCR testing: a discordant testing analysis.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results. RESULTS: During the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5-17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6-98.9%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Studies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19.

Development and validation of RT-PCR assays for testing for SARS-CoV-2.

Background: The recent emergence and rapid global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) demonstrates the urgent need for laboratory-developed assays for clinical diagnosis and public health interventions in the absence of commercial assays. Methods: We outline the progression of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays that were developed and validated at the Alberta Precision Laboratories, Public Health Laboratory, Alberta, Canada, to respond to this pandemic. Initially, testing was performed using SARS-CoV-2-specific and pan-coronavirus gel-based assays that were soon superseded by real-time RT-PCR assays targeting the envelope and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase genes to accommodate the high anticipated volumes of samples. Throughput was further enhanced by multiplexing the different targets together with the co-detection of an internal extraction control. Results: These assays are comparable in sensitivity and specificity to the assays recommended by the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Conclusions: The availability of real-time RT-PCR assays early in the pandemic was essential to provide valuable time to local health authorities to contain transmission and prepare for appropriate response strategies.

Historique: La récente émergence et la propagation mondiale rapide du coronavirus 2 du syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (SARS-CoV-2) a démontré l'urgence de créer des dosages en laboratoire pour poser un diagnostic clinique et adopter des interventions sanitaires en l'absence de dosages commerciaux. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs exposent la progression des dosages d'amplification en chaîne par polymérase couplée à la transcriptase inverse (RT-PCR) mis au point et validés par les Alberta Precision Laboratories du Laboratoire de santé publique de l'Alberta, au Canada, pour répondre à cette pandémie. Les tests ont d'abord été effectués au moyen de dosages sur gel spécifiques au SARS-CoV-2 ou décelant tous les coronavirus, mais ont vite été remplacés par des dosages RT-PCR en temps réel ciblant l'enveloppe et les gènes d'ARN polymérase sous la dépendance d'ARN pour répondre au fort volume anticipé d'échantillons. Le criblage a également été renforcé par le multiplexage conjoint des différentes cibles et la codétection d'un contrôle d'extraction interne. Résultats: Ces dosages ont une sensibilité et une spécificité comparables à ceux recommandés par l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé et les Centers for Disease Control and Prevention des États-Unis. Conclusions: Il était essentiel de disposer de dosages RT-PCR au début de la pandémie pour que les autorités sanitaires locales puissent profiter de temps précieux pour contenir la transmission et préparer les stratégies de réponse appropriées.