Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 11(3): 186-93, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24286301

RESUMEN

Escherichia coli O26 is second only to O157 in causing foodborne, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) infections. Our objectives were to determine fecal prevalence and characteristics of E. coli O26 in commercial feedlot cattle (17,148) that were enrolled in a study to evaluate an E. coli O157:H7 siderophore receptor and porin (SRP(®)) vaccine (VAC) and a direct-fed microbial (DFM; 10(6) colony-forming units [CFU]/animal/day of Lactobacillus acidophilus and 10(9) CFU/animal/day of Propionibacterium freudenreichii). Cattle were randomly allocated to 40 pens within 10 complete blocks; pens were randomly assigned to control, VAC, DFM, or VAC+DFM treatments. Vaccine was administered on days 0 and 21, and DFM was fed throughout the study. Pen-floor fecal samples (30/pen) were collected weekly for the last 4 study weeks. Samples were enriched in E. coli broth and subjected to a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) designed to detect O26-specific wzx gene and four major virulence genes (stx1, stx2, eae, and ehxA) and to a culture-based procedure that involved immunomagnetic separation and plating on MacConkey agar. Ten presumptive E. coli colonies were randomly picked, pooled, and tested by the multiplex PCR. Pooled colonies positive for O26 serogroup were streaked on sorbose MacConkey agar, and 10 randomly picked colonies per sample were tested individually by the multiplex PCR. The overall prevalence of E. coli O26 was higher (p<0.001) by the culture-based method compared to the PCR assay (22.7 versus 10.5%). The interventions (VAC and or DFM) had no impact on fecal shedding of O26. Serogroup O26 was recovered in pure culture from 23.9% (260 of 1089) of O26 PCR-positive pooled colonies. Only 7 of the 260 isolates were positive for the stx gene and 90.1% of the isolates possessed an eaeß gene that codes for intimin subtype ß, but not the bfpA gene, which codes for bundle-forming pilus. Therefore, the majority of the O26 recovered from feedlot cattle feces was atypical enteropathogenic E. coli, and not STEC.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Bacterianas/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/microbiología , Escherichia coli Enteropatógena/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/veterinaria , Escherichia coli O157/inmunología , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/microbiología , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Derrame de Bacterias , Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Bovinos/prevención & control , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana/veterinaria , Escherichia coli Enteropatógena/genética , Escherichia coli Enteropatógena/inmunología , Escherichia coli Enteropatógena/fisiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/prevención & control , Proteínas de Escherichia coli/genética , Heces/microbiología , Microbiología de Alimentos , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/prevención & control , Humanos , Lactobacillus acidophilus/fisiología , Proteínas de Transporte de Membrana/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex/veterinaria , Prevalencia , Propionibacterium/fisiología , Distribución Aleatoria , Toxinas Shiga/genética , Especificidad de la Especie , Factores de Virulencia/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...