Recovery scenario and immunity in COVID-19 disease: A new strategy to predict the potential of reinfection.

Background: The recent ongoing outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), still is an unsolved problem with a growing rate of infected cases and mortality worldwide. The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is targeting the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and mostly causes a respiratory illness. Although acquired and resistance immunity is one of the most important aspects of alleviating the trend of the current pandemic; however, there is still a big gap of knowledge regarding the infection process, immunopathogenesis, recovery, and reinfection. Aim of Review: To answer the questions regarding "the potential and probability of reinfection in COVID-19 infected cases" or "the efficiency and duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced immunity against reinfection" we critically evaluated the current reports on SARS-CoV-2 immunity and reinfection with special emphasis on comparative studies using animal models that generalize their finding about protection and reinfection. Also, the contribution of humoral immunity in the process of COVID-19 recovery and the role of ACE2 in virus infectivity and pathogenesis has been discussed. Furthermore, innate and cellular immunity and inflammatory responses in the disease and recovery conditions are reviewed and an overall outline of immunologic aspects of COVID-19 progression and recovery in three different stages are presented. Finally, we categorized the infected cases into four different groups based on the acquired immunity and the potential for reinfection. Key Scientific Concepts of Review: In this review paper, we proposed a new strategy to predict the potential of reinfection in each identified category. This classification may help to distribute resources more meticulously to determine: who needs to be serologically tested for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, what percentage of the population is immune to the virus, and who needs to be vaccinated.

Life-Long Implications of Developmental Exposure to Environmental Stressors: New Perspectives.

The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) paradigm is one of the most rapidly expanding areas of biomedical research. Environmental stressors that can impact on DOHaD encompass a variety of environmental and occupational hazards as well as deficiency and oversupply of nutrients and energy. They can disrupt early developmental processes and lead to increased susceptibility to disease/dysfunctions later in life. Presentations at the fourth Conference on Prenatal Programming and Toxicity in Boston, in October 2014, provided important insights and led to new recommendations for research and public health action. The conference highlighted vulnerable exposure windows that can occur as early as the preconception period and epigenetics as a major mechanism than can lead to disadvantageous "reprogramming" of the genome, thereby potentially resulting in transgenerational effects. Stem cells can also be targets of environmental stressors, thus paving another way for effects that may last a lifetime. Current testing paradigms do not allow proper characterization of risk factors and their interactions. Thus, relevant exposure levels and combinations for testing must be identified from human exposure situations and outcome assessments. Testing of potential underpinning mechanisms and biomarker development require laboratory animal models and in vitro approaches. Only few large-scale birth cohorts exist, and collaboration between birth cohorts on a global scale should be facilitated. DOHaD-based research has a crucial role in establishing factors leading to detrimental outcomes and developing early preventative/remediation strategies to combat these risks.

New insights into the role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in the function of CD11c⁺ cells during respiratory viral infection.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) has garnered considerable attention as a modulator of CD4(+) cell lineage development and function. It also regulates antiviral CD8(+) T-cell responses, but via indirect mechanisms that have yet to be determined. Here, we show that during acute influenza virus infection, AHR activation skews dendritic-cell (DC) subsets in the lung-draining lymph nodes, such that there are fewer conventional CD103(+) DCs and CD11b(+) DCs. Sorting DC subsets reveals AHR activation reduces immunostimulatory function of CD103(+) DCs in the mediastinal lymph nodes, and decreases their frequency in the lung. DNA-binding domain Ahr mutants demonstrate that alterations in DC subsets require the ligand-activated AHR to contain its inherent DNA-binding domain. To evaluate the intrinsic role of AHR in DCs, conditional knockouts were created using Cre-LoxP technology, which revealed that AHR in CD11c(+) cells plays a key role in controlling the acquisition of effector CD8(+) T cells in the infected lung. However, AHR within other leukocyte lineages contributes to diminished naïve CD8(+) T-cell activation in the draining lymphoid nodes. These findings indicate DCs are among the direct targets of AHR ligands in vivo, and AHR signaling modifies host responses to a common respiratory pathogen by affecting the complex interplay of multiple cell types.

Lung development and the host response to influenza A virus are altered by different doses of neonatal oxygen in mice.

Oxygen exposure in preterm infants has been associated with altered lung development and increased risk for respiratory viral infections later in life. Although the dose of oxygen sufficient to exert these changes in humans remains unknown, adult mice exposed to 100% oxygen between postnatal days 1-4 exhibit alveolar simplification and increased sensitivity to influenza virus infection. Additionally, two nonlinear thresholds of neonatal oxygen exposures were previously identified that promote modest (between 40% and 60% oxygen) and severe (between 80% and 100% oxygen) changes in lung development. Here, we investigate whether these two thresholds correlate with the severity of lung disease following respiratory viral infection. Adult mice exposed to 100% oxygen at birth, and to a lesser extent 80% oxygen, demonstrated enhanced body weight loss, persistent inflammation, and fibrosis following infection compared with infected siblings exposed to room air at birth. In contrast, the host response to infection was indistinguishable between mice exposed to room air and 40% or 60% oxygen. Interestingly, levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 were equivalently elevated in infected mice that had been exposed to 80% or 100% oxygen as neonates. However, reducing levels of MCP-1 using heterozygous Mcp-1 mice did not affect oxygen-dependent changes in the response to infection. Thus lung development and the host response to respiratory viral infection are disrupted by different doses of oxygen. Our findings suggest that measuring lung function alone may not be sufficient to identify individuals born prematurely who have increased risk for respiratory viral infection.