Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nivasorexant in adults with binge-eating disorder: A randomized, Phase II proof of concept trial.

OBJECTIVE: This Phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of nivasorexant in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe binge-eating disorder (BED). METHODS: Adults meeting the DSM-5 BED criteria were randomized 1:1 to placebo or nivasorexant (100 mg b.i.d.). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 12 in the number of binge eating (BE) days per week. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included cessation of BE in the last 4 weeks of treatment; and change from baseline to Week 12 in the number of BE episodes/week, the clinician global impression (CGI) of change, the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for BE, and the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD-17). Key safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest (i.e., somnolence and fatigue). RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants were randomized to each treatment arm. The change from baseline to Week 12 in the number of BE days/week was the same for placebo (least squares mean [LSM]: -2.93) and nivasorexant (LSM: -2.93), with no difference between the treatment groups (LSM difference = .000 [95% confidence interval (CI): -.69, .69], p = .9992). Furthermore, no differences between treatment groups were observed in the exploratory efficacy endpoints. Nivasorexant was well tolerated; the overall incidence of TEAEs was balanced between treatment groups, and the frequency of somnolence and fatigue in the nivasorexant group were similar to placebo. DISCUSSION: In this proof-of-concept study, 100 mg b.i.d. nivasorexant did not improve BE in adults with moderate to severe BED. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this Phase II study indicate that nivasorexant was well tolerated in adults with BED, but did not improve binge eating behavior over placebo. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of the role of the orexin-1 receptor in BED.

Efficacy and Safety of Daridorexant in Older and Younger Adults with Insomnia Disorder: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant, studied in two phase III trials, dose-dependently improved objective and subjective sleep variables and daytime functioning in adults with insomnia. Because treatment of insomnia in older adults is challenging and has limited options, the purpose of the current analysis was to further analyse the phase III trial studying the higher doses of daridorexant, those that showed efficacy (daridorexant 50 mg, daridorexant 25 mg and placebo, nightly for 3 months), and compare the safety and efficacy of daridorexant in patients aged ≥ 65 ('older adults') to those aged < 65 years ('younger adults'). METHODS: Analyses by age (≥ 65 years, n = 364; < 65 years, n = 566) were performed on data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Trial 1 in adult patients with insomnia (NCT03545191). Efficacy endpoints included a change from baseline at month 1 and month 3 in polysomnography-measured wake after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS), self-reported total sleep time (sTST) and daytime functioning assessed using the validated Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ). Safety endpoints included adverse events and the Visual Analog Scale for morning sleepiness. RESULTS: At baseline, mean [standard deviation] WASO was numerically greater (110 [39] vs 92 [38] min) in older than younger adults, while LPS was comparable (~ 65 min). Mean baseline IDSIQ total and all domain scores were numerically lower (i.e. better) in older adults. Daridorexant caused similar reductions in WASO and LPS, and similar increases in sTST, from baseline, in both age groups; improvements were numerically greater with daridorexant 50 mg than 25 mg. At month 3, daridorexant 50 mg, compared with placebo, decreased WASO by a least-squares mean of 19.6 (95% confidence interval 9.7, 29.5) in older patients versus 17.4 min (10.7, 24.0) in younger patients and decreased LPS by a least-squares mean of 14.9 (7.5, 22.3) in older patients versus 9.7 min (3.7, 15.7) in younger patients. Daridorexant 50 mg increased sTST from baseline to month 3 by a least-squares mean of 59.9 (49.6, 70.3) in older patients versus 57.1 min (48.9, 65.3) in younger patients. Daridorexant 50 mg progressively improved IDSIQ total and domain scores from week 1 onwards similarly in both groups; daridorexant 25 mg improved IDSIQ scores, but only in younger adults. In both age groups, in comparison with placebo, the overall incidence of adverse events was comparable, and there were fewer falls on daridorexant. Daridorexant improved Visual Analog Scale morning sleepiness in both groups; daridorexant 50 mg increased the mean (standard deviation) Visual Analog Scale morning sleepiness score by 15.9 (20.7) in older adults and by 14.9 (18.7) in younger adults from baseline to month 3. In older adults, there was one case of sleep paralysis, and no cases of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or complex sleep behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients with insomnia, as in younger patients, the efficacy of daridorexant is maximal on night-time and daytime variables at the higher dose of 50 mg. Older patients particularly require this dose to improve daytime functioning. Older patients are not at an increased risk of adverse events or residual effects the next morning after night-time administration of daridorexant, even at 50 mg. The dose of daridorexant does not need to be decreased for older patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03545191) [first posted: 4 June, 4 2018], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03545191 .

The burden of chronic insomnia (difficulty in falling/staying asleep or not getting enough sleep) increases with age yet treatment options in older patients are limited. In older patients, because of a risk of side effects, guidelines suggest caution when prescribing sleep medications and, for some drugs, recommend starting at a lower dose. Daridorexant was approved in 2022 for the treatment of insomnia in adults following positive results in two trials that showed daridorexant significantly improved night-time sleep and daytime functioning over 3 months of treatment in adults with insomnia. Approximately 40% of patients taking part in these trials were aged 65 years or older. This current analysis compared the safety and benefits of daridorexant in older adults (aged at least 65 years) and younger adults (aged less than 65 years) in the trial that administered the highest two doses of daridorexant, 25 and 50 mg. The results showed that the benefits of daridorexant were comparable in both age groups over 3 months; compared with placebo, daridorexant improved night-time sleep (reduced time awake during the night, reduced time to fall asleep and increased total sleep time) and daytime functioning­patients had less daytime sleepiness and a better mood and feeling of alertness. In older patients, the benefits, particularly for daytime functioning, were greatest at the higher 50-mg dose, without any increase in side effects. Both doses of daridorexant were equally well tolerated in the two age groups, indicating that treatment with daridorexant at 50 mg can be safely started in older patients.

Safety and efficacy of daridorexant in patients with insomnia disorder: results from two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Daytime functioning is impaired in people with insomnia disorder. Currently available dual orexin receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in insomnia disorder, but do not address all aspects of this disease. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of daridorexant, a novel orexin receptor antagonist, on night-time and daytime symptoms of insomnia. METHODS: We did two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials at 156 sites in 17 countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with insomnia disorder were randomly assigned using interactive response technology (1:1:1) to receive daridorexant 50 mg, 25 mg, or placebo (study 1) or daridorexant 25 mg, 10 mg, or placebo (study 2) every evening for 3 months. Participants, investigators, and site personnel were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoints were change from baseline in wake time after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS), measured by polysomnography, at months 1 and 3. The secondary endpoints were change from baseline in self-reported total sleep time and the sleepiness domain score of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) at months 1 and 3. Study-wise type I error rate (5%) was controlled for all pairwise comparisons. Efficacy was analysed in all randomly assigned participants, and safety in all participants who received at least one dose of treatment. The studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03545191 (study 1) and NCT03575104 (study 2). FINDINGS: Between June 4, 2018 and Feb 25, 2020, 930 participants were randomly assigned to receive daridorexant 50 mg (n=310), daridorexant 25 mg (n=310), or placebo (n=310) in study 1. Between May 29, 2018, and May 14, 2020, 924 participants were randomly assigned to receive daridorexant 25 mg (n=309), daridorexant 10 mg (n=307), or placebo (n=308) in study 2. In study 1, WASO and LPS were significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group compared with participants in the placebo group at month 1 (least squares mean [LSM] difference -22·8 min [95% CI -28·0 to -17·6], p<0·0001 for WASO; -11·4 min [-16·0 to -6·7], p<0·0001 for LPS) and month 3 (-18·3 min [-23·9 to -12·7], p<0·0001 for WASO; -11·7 min [-16·3 to -7·0], p<0·0001 for LPS). WASO and LPS were significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group compared with the placebo group at month 1 (LSM difference -12·2 min [-17·4 to -7·0], p<0·0001 for WASO; -8·3 min [-13·0 to -3·6], p=0·0005 for LPS) and month 3 (-11·9 min [-17·5 to -6·2], p<0·0001 for WASO; -7·6 min [-12·3 to -2·9], p=0·0015 for LPS). Compared with placebo, participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group had significantly improved self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 22·1 min [14·4 to 29·7], p<0·0001) and month 3 (19·8 min [10·6 to 28·9], p<0·0001), and IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores at month 1 (-1·8 [-2·5 to -1·0], p<0·0001) and month 3 (-1·9 [-2·9 to -0·9], p=0·0002). Compared with the placebo group, participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group had significantly improved self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 12·6 min [5·0 to 20·3], p=0·0013) and month 3 (9·9 min [0·8 to 19·1], p=0·033), but not IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·8 [-1·5 to 0·01], p=0·055 at month 1; -1·0 [-2·0 to 0·01], p=0·053 at month 3). In study 2, WASO was significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group compared with participants in the placebo group at month 1 (LSM difference -11·6 min [-17·6 to -5·6], p=0·0001) and month 3 (-10·3 min [-17·0 to -3·5], p=0·0028), whereas no significant differences in LPS were observed at month 1 (-6·5 min [-12·3 to -0·6], p=0·030) or month 3 (-9·0 [-15·3 to -2·7], p=0·0053). Compared with the placebo group, participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group had significant improvement in self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 16·1 min [8·2 to 24·0], p<0·0001) and month 3 (19·1 [10·1 to 28·0], p<0·0001), but not in IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·8 [-1·6 to 0·1], p=0·073 at month 1; -1·3 [-2·2 to -0·3], p=0·012 at month 3). Compared with the placebo group, no significant differences were observed among participants in the daridorexant 10 mg group for WASO (LSM difference -2·7 min [-8·7 to 3·2], p=0·37 at month 1; -2·0 [-8·7 to 4·8], p=0·57 at month 3), LPS (-2·6 min [-8·4 to 3·2], p=0·38 at month 1; -3·2 min [-9·5 to 3·1], p=0·32 at month 3), self-reported total sleep time (13·4 min [5·5 to 21·2], p=0·0009 at month 1; 13·6 min [4·7 to 22·5], p=0·0028 at month 3), nor IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·4 [-1·3 to 0·4], p=0·30 at month 1; -0·7 [-1·7 to 0·2], p=0·14 at month 3). Overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between treatment groups (116 [38%] of 308 participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group, 117 [38%] of 310 in the daridorexant 25 mg group, and 105 [34%] of 309 in the placebo group in study 1; 121 [39%] of 308 participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group, 117 [38%] of 306 in the daridorexant 10 mg group, and 100 [33%] of 306 in the placebo group). Nasopharyngitis and headache were the most common adverse events in all groups. One death (cardiac arrest) occurred in the daridorexant 25 mg group in study 1, which was not deemed to be treatment-related. INTERPRETATION: Daridorexant 25 mg and 50 mg improved sleep outcomes, and daridorexant 50 mg also improved daytime functioning, in people with insomnia disorder, with a favourable safety profile. FUNDING: Idorsia Pharmaceuticals.

Daridorexant, a new dual orexin receptor antagonist, in elderly subjects with insomnia disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dose-response of daridorexant, a new dual orexin receptor antagonist, on wake after sleep onset (WASO). METHODS: Elderly (≥65 years) participants (n = 58) with insomnia were randomly allocated (Latin square design) to receive 5 treatments (5, 10, 25, and 50 mg daridorexant and placebo) during 5 treatment periods, each consisting of 2 treatment nights followed by a 5- to 12-day washout period. Main efficacy endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in WASO (primary) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS; secondary) to days 1 and 2 (mean of 2 treatment nights assessed by polysomnography) in each period. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 58 participants included, 67% were female, and the median age was 69 years (range 65-85 years). WASO and LPS were dose-dependently reduced from baseline to days 1 and 2 after daridorexant administration (multiple comparison procedure modeling, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.004, respectively); reductions were statistically significant for doses ≥10 mg compared with placebo (WASO: -32.0, -45.1, -61.4 minutes; LPS: -44.9, -43.8, -45.4 minutes for 10, 25, and 50 mg, respectively, p ≤ 0.025). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for daridorexant and placebo; the most frequent were fatigue, nasopharyngitis, gait disturbance, and headache (≤7% in any group). CONCLUSIONS: Daridorexant was well tolerated. Dose-dependent improvements in WASO and LPS were statistically significant (dose range 10-50 mg) in elderly people with insomnia disorder. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02841709. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that, for elderly people with insomnia, daridorexant reduced WASO.

Daridorexant, a New Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist to Treat Insomnia Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dose-response relationship of daridorexant, a new dual orexin receptor antagonist, on sleep variables in subjects with insomnia disorder. METHODS: Adults (≤64 years) with insomnia disorder were randomized (1:1:1:1:1:1) to receive daily oral placebo, daridorexant (5, 10, 25, or 50mg), or 10mg zolpidem for 30 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in wake time after sleep onset from baseline to days 1 and 2. Secondary outcome measures were change in latency to persistent sleep from baseline to days 1 and 2, change in subjective wake time after sleep onset, and subjective latency to sleep onset from baseline to week 4. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 1,005 subjects screened, 359 (64% female) were randomized and received ≥1 dose. A significant dose-response relationship (multiple comparison procedure-modeling, 2-sided p < 0.001) was found in the reduction of wake after sleep onset and latency to persistent sleep from baseline to days 1 and 2 with daridorexant. These reductions were sustained through to days 28 and 29 (p = 0.050 and p = 0.042, respectively). Similar dose-dependent relationships were observed for subjective wake after sleep onset and subjective latency to sleep onset. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 35%, 38%, 38%, and 34% in subjects treated with 5, 10, 25, and 50mg daridorexant, respectively, compared with 30% for placebo, and 40% for 10mg zolpidem. There were no clinically relevant treatment-related serious adverse events. Four subjects withdrew due to adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Daridorexant induced a dose-dependent reduction in wake time after sleep onset in subjects with insomnia disorder (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02839200). Ann Neurol 2020;87:347-356.

Phase 1/1B trial of the heat shock protein 90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 as monotherapy or in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: NVP-AUY922 (AUY; Luminespib) with or without bortezomib showed preclinical activity against multiple myeloma (MM) cells. This phase 1/1B study assessed NVP-AUY922 alone and with bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. METHODS: Dose escalation was guided by an adaptive Bayesian logistic regression model. In phase 1, patients who progressed after 2 to 4 prior therapies received NVP-AUY922 intravenously once weekly. In phase 1B, patients who progressed after 2 or fewer prior therapies received NVP-AUY922 plus bortezomib. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of NVP-AUY922. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received NVP-AUY922 monotherapy at doses of 8 to 70 mg/m(2) . One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed (grade 3 blurred vision at 70 mg/m(2) ); no MTD was reached. The recommended phase 2 dose was 70 mg/m(2) . The most frequent drug-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, nausea, and ocular toxicities. Grade 3/4 AEs were uncommon (<10%). Eight patients discontinued treatment because of AEs; 5 had ocular toxicities (≥45 mg/m(2) ). The best response was stable disease in 66.7% of the patients. There were no partial or complete responses. Five patients received NVP-AUY922 (which was started at 50 mg/m(2) ) plus bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) ). Three of these patients experienced DLT. No further dose escalation was performed; the MTD for NVP-AUY922 plus bortezomib was not established. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed disease stabilization with NVP-AUY922 in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The MTD for NVP-AUY922 was not reached, but reversible ocular toxicity has been reported at high dose levels. Bortezomib at the standard recommended dose plus NVP-AUY922 was not tolerated.

Comparison of human placenta- and bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stem cells.

Bone marrow is the traditional source of human multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), but placenta appears to be an alternative and more readily available source. This study comprehensively compared human placenta-derived MSC (hpMSC) and human bone marrow-derived MSC (hbmMSC) in terms of cell characteristics, optimal growth conditions and in vivo safety specifically to determine if hpMSC could represent a source of human MSC for clinical trial. MSC were isolated from human placenta (hpMSC) and human bone marrow (hbmMSC) and expanded ex vivo using good manufacturing practice-compliant reagents. hpMSC and hbmMSC showed similar proliferation characteristics in different basal culture media types, fetal calf serum (FCS) concentrations, FCS heat-inactivation experiments, flask types and media replacement responsiveness. However, hpMSC and hbmMSC differed with respect to their proliferation capabilities at different seeding densities, with hbmMSC proliferating more slowly than hpMSC in every experiment. hpMSC had greater long-term growth ability than hbmMSC. MSC from both sources exhibited similar light microscopy morphology, size, cell surface phenotype, and mesodermal differentiation ability with the exception that hpMSC consistently appeared less able to differentiate to the adipogenic lineage. A comparison of both hbmMSC and hpMSC from early and medium passage cultures using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) GeneChip analysis confirmed GTG-banding data that no copy number changes had been acquired during sequential passaging. In three of three informative cases (in which the gender of the delivered baby was male), hpMSC were of maternal origin. Neither hpMSC nor hbmMSC caused any acute toxicity in normal mice when injected intravenously at the same, or higher, doses than those currently used in clinical trials of hbmMSC. This study suggests that human placenta is an acceptable alternative source for human MSC and their use is currently being evaluated in clinical trials.

Customised birthweight: coefficients for an Australian population and validation of the model.

BACKGROUND: Published birthweight references in Australia do not fully take into account constitutional factors that influence birthweight and therefore may not provide an accurate reference to identify the infant with abnormal growth. Furthermore, studies in other regions that have derived adjusted (customised) birthweight references have applied untested assumptions in the statistical modelling. AIMS: To validate the customised birthweight model and to produce a reference set of coefficients for estimating a customised birthweight that may be useful for maternity care in Australia and for future research. METHODS: De-identified data were extracted from the clinical database for all births at the Mater Mother's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, between January 1997 and June 2005. Births with missing data for the variables under study were excluded. In addition the following were excluded: multiple pregnancies, births less than 37 completed week's gestation, stillbirths, and major congenital abnormalities. Multivariate analysis was undertaken. A double cross-validation procedure was used to validate the model. RESULTS: The study of 42,206 births demonstrated that, for statistical purposes, birthweight is normally distributed. Coefficients for the derivation of customised birthweight in an Australian population were developed and the statistical model is demonstrably robust. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical data as to the robustness of the model to determine customised birthweight. Further research is required to define where normal physiology ends and pathology begins, and which segments of the population should be included in the construction of a customised birthweight standard.