RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Questions concerning under-reporting of occupational diseases (OD) linked to asbestos exposure are regularly voiced in France. Monitoring of the French multicenter Asbestos-Related Disease Cohort (ARDCO), which ensures post-occupational medical surveillance of subjects having been exposed to asbestos, provides information on (1) the medico-legal steps taken following screening by computed tomography (CT) for benign thoracic diseases, and (2) recognition of OD as a causal factor in malignant diseases. METHODS: OD recognition - and possible compensation - was analyzed in July 2021 among 13,289 volunteers in the cohort recruited between 2003 and 2005. RESULTS: Fifteen percent of the subjects in the cohort were found to have at least one recognized asbestos-related OD (78.2% benign pleural disease, 10.3% asbestosis, 14.2% lung cancer, and 6.0% mesothelioma). Only 58% of pleural plaques reported by the radiologist who performed the CT resulted in their recognition as ODs. On a parallel track, 88.7% of the mesotheliomas identified based on French National health insurance data and 46.9% of lung cancers were recognized as ODs. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of a system designed to facilitate recognition, leading to possible compensation, of asbestos-related occupational diseases. The system could be improved by better training of the medical actors involved.
Asunto(s)
Amianto , Asbestosis , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Indemnización para Trabajadores , Humanos , Francia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Asbestosis/epidemiología , Asbestosis/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Amianto/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Mesotelioma/epidemiología , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico , Mesotelioma/etiologíaRESUMEN
The objectives of this systematic review of original articles published up until August 2021 and meta-analyses were to identify the links between occupational and non-occupational environmental exposures, types of occupations and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Sixteen selected case-control studies were qualified as good level with Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Sensitivity analyses highlighted the role of choice of control group, tobacco adjustment and diagnostic tools. Significantly increased risks of IPF were observed (OR (95%CI): for metals (1.42(1.05-1.92)), wood (OR:1.32(1.02-1.71)), and general dust (OR:1.32(1.08-1.63)) exposures. Subgroup analyses found a significantly elevated risk for: hardwood (OR:1.75 (1.13-2.70)), organic dusts (OR:1.72 (1.20-2.46)) and pesticides (OR:2.30 (1.30-4.08)), while no significant change was noted for softwoods and solvents. Smoking adjustments: general dust (1.45 (1.04-2.03)/organic dust (2.5 (1.49-4.22)/metals (1.87 (1.16-3)/wood dust OR: 1.16 (0.86-1.61)/pesticide exposure 2.4 (0.84-6.9) were calculated. Among agricultural workers, the risk was also increased (OR:2.06 (1.02-4.16)). Few environmental data were available and no significant associations detected. Thus, these meta-analyses highlighted the role of some occupational exposures in IPF occurrence. A more accurate and thorough assessment of exposures over the entire working life as well as on the duration and intensity of exposure and complex of multi-pollutant exposure is needed in future research and clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ambientales , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática , Exposición Profesional , Plaguicidas , Humanos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/inducido químicamente , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/epidemiología , Polvo , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Metales , SolventesRESUMEN
Work-related asthma (WRA) accounts for 10-25% of all adult asthma. It therefore seems important to raise questions regarding an asthmatic's approach to occupational or job training activities. WRA takes on two forms: work-exacerbated asthma (WEA) and occupational asthma (OA), which encompasses different subtypes of heterogeneous mechanisms. It currently represents a major challenge for occupational medicine in terms of detailed diagnosis, social care, the economic repercussions for workers and employers and, last but not least, social insurance. This review aims to sensitize health care practitioners to the peculiarities of WRA management in routine practice. More specifically, prognosis depends on early diagnosis, medical care and work adjustment measures. WEA and OA are explained in detail in view of identifying causative agents and at-risk occupations and defining adapted medical strategy. Relevant lines of questioning and complementary exams are presented. In addition, the key role of the occupational physician, especially as regards recognition and identification of occupational disease, is underlined, the objective being to facilitate optimal professional and social management. In future studies, the key role of counseling and orientation mechanisms should be highlighted as means of preventing WRA occurrence.
Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional , Enfermedades Profesionales , Exposición Profesional , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiología , Asma Ocupacional/etiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In France, long-term follow-up after occupational exposure to asbestos is recommended. This study looked at the psychological consequences in the longer term following a CT-scan, in particular the impact of having received compensation for an occupational disease. METHODS: As part of an asbestos post-exposure survey study (APExS), volunteers from Normandy were asked to complete self-assessment questionnaires about their psychological condition at different points during follow-up, including a psychological questionnaire before, then 6 months, and finally 18 to 24 months after their chest CT-scan. Information collected from 622 individuals were analyzed based on information provided as to the result of the screening and whether they had received compensation for having an occupational disease. RESULTS: The identification of an occupational disease eligible for compensation is associated with a long term increase in psychological distress. The impact of psychological state during follow-up is greater in men who reported receiving occupational disease compensation. The discovery of an asbestos-related disease during the screening is associated with a negative perception of general health and an increase in psychological distress. CONCLUSION: The receipt of compensation of an occupational disease does not seem to compensate for the negative psychological impact related to the discovery of a disease during the asbestos post-exposure follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Amianto/toxicidad , Asbestosis/psicología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asbestosis/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Francia , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Torácica , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Compensation for occupational pulmonary diseases requires the establishment of guidelines based on standardized and objective criteria, in order to provide compensation that is as fair as possible to patients who suffer from them. A review of the elements necessary for the examination of an individual file was carried out by a working group. It is accepted that respiratory functional exploration is the key element in assessing the level of permanent disability in all of these conditions, with the exception of thoracic malignancies. Guiding scales have been developed for the respiratory impairment of three types of conditions: occupational asthma, thoracic malignancy, and other respiratory diseases. Additional criteria for increasing the permanent disability level are also proposed in order to take into account professional prejudice, in particular the possibility or not of continuing the occupational activity, in the same job or after changing to another. For certain respiratory diseases, a periodic reassessment of the initially attributed permanent disability level is recommended as well as the initial one at the time of definitive cessation of occupational activity.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/economía , Asma/epidemiología , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Personas con Discapacidad , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pulmonares/economía , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Indemnización para TrabajadoresRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The 2015 WHO classification of tumors categorized malignant mesothelioma into epithelioid, biphasic (BMM), and sarcomatoid (SMM) for prognostic relevance and treatment decisions. The survival of BMM is suspected to correlate with the amount of the sarcomatoid component. The criteria for a sarcomatoid component and the interobserver variability between pathologists for identifying this component are not well described. In ambiguous cases, a "transitional" (TMM) subtype has been proposed but was not accepted as a specific subtype in the 2015 WHO classification. The aims of this study were to evaluate the interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of BMM, to determine the nature and the significance of TMM subtype, and to relate the percentage of sarcomatoid component with survival. The value of staining for BRCA-1-associated protein (BAP1) and CDKN2A(p16) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were also assessed with respect to each of the tumoral components. METHODS: The study was conducted by the International Mesothelioma Panel supported by the French National Cancer Institute, the network of rare cancer (EURACAN) and in collaboration with the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). The patient cases include a random group of 42 surgical biopsy samples diagnosed as BMM with evaluation of SMM component by the French Panel of MESOPATH experts was selected from the total series of 971 BMM cases collected from 1998 to 2016. Fourteen international pathologists with expertise in mesothelioma reviewed digitally scanned slides (hematoxylin and eosin - stained and pan-cytokeratin) without knowledge of prior diagnosis or outcome. Cases with at least 7 of 14 pathologists recognizing TMM features were selected as a TMM group. Demographic, clinical, histopathologic, treatment, and follow-up data were retrieved from the MESOBANK database. BAP1 (clone C-4) loss and CDKN2A(p16) homozygous deletion (HD) were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH, respectively. Kappa statistics were applied for interobserver agreement and multivariate analysis with Cox regression adjusted for age and gender was performed for survival analysis. RESULTS: The 14 panelists recorded a total of 544 diagnoses. The interobserver correlation was moderate (weighted Kappa = 0.45). Of the cases originally classified as BMM by MESOPATH, the reviewers agreed in 71% of cases (385 of 544 opinions), with cases classified as pure epithelioid in 17% (93 of 544), and pure sarcomatoid in 12% (66 of 544 opinions). Diagnosis of BMM was made on morphology or IHC alone in 23% of the cases and with additional assessment of IHC in 77% (402 of 544). The median overall survival (OS) of the 42 BMM cases was 8 months. The OS for BMM was significantly different from SMM and epithelioid malignant mesothelioma (p < 0.0001). In BMM, a sarcomatoid component of less than 80% correlated with a better survival (p = 0.02). There was a significant difference in survival between BMM with TMM showing a median survival at 6 months compared to 12 months for those without TMM (p < 0.0001). BAP1 loss was observed in 50% (21 of 42) of the total cases and in both components in 26%. We also compared the TMM group to that of more aggressive patterns of epithelioid subtypes of mesothelioma (solid and pleomorphic of our large MESOPATH cohort). The curve of transitional type was persistently close to the OS curve of the sarcomatoid component. The group of sarcomatoid, transitional, and pleomorphic mesothelioma were very close to each other. We then considered the contribution of BAP1 immunostaining and loss of CDKN2A(p16) by FISH. BAP1 loss was observed in 50% (21 of 41) of the total cases and in both component in 27% of the cases (11 of 41). There was no significant difference in BAP1 loss between the TMM and non-TMM groups. HD CDKN2A(p16) was detected in 74% of the total cases with no significant difference between the TMM and non-TMM groups. In multivariate analysis, TMM morphology was an indicator of poor prognosis with a hazard ratio = 3.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.6 - 8.0; and p = 0.003 even when compared to the presence of HD CDKN2A(p16) on sarcomatoid component (hazard ratio = 4.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 - 16.3, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver concordance among the international mesothelioma and French mesothelioma panel suggests clinical utility for an updated definition of biphasic mesothelioma that allows better stratification of patients into risk groups for treatment decisions, systemic anticancer therapy, or selection for surgery or palliation. We also have shown the usefulness of FISH detection of CDKN2A(p16) HD compared to BAP1 loss on the spindle cell component for the separation in ambiguous cases between benign florid stromal reaction from true sarcomatoid component of biphasic mesothelioma. Taken together our results further validate the concept of transitional pattern as a poor prognostic indicator.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Mesotelioma/patología , Mesotelioma Maligno , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosAsunto(s)
Contaminación Ambiental/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Pulmón/fisiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/clasificación , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Testimonio de Experto , Francia , Salud , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Neumología/organización & administración , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to review the literature regarding the dose-response relationship between occupational exposure to chemicals classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as carcinogenic agents and the risk of some lung cancers and on any combined effect with tobacco exposure on lung cancer risk. METHODS: A literature search was performed in three databases as well as in the IARC monographs between January 1990 and April 2015. RESULTS: The literature is abundant for some carcinogens such as asbestos, crystalline silica and diesel exhaust fumes but is more sparse for many carcinogens and particularly any interaction with tobacco on lung cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Few data exist for most lung occupational carcinogens including their interaction with tobacco exposure. In the case of exposure to occupational carcinogens and co-exposure to tobacco smoke, there is a dual primary prevention objective: the elimination of both occupational risk factors and tobacco smoke.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Carcinógenos , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos , TrabajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases in developed countries, but data about its temporal trends in incidence remain sparse. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe OACD trends in terms of industrial activities and main causal agents in France over the period 2001-2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the French National Network of Occupational Disease Vigilance and Prevention (RNV3P, Réseau National de Vigilance et de Prévention des Pathologies Professionnelles). All OACD considered probably or certainly associated with an occupational exposure were included in the study. Trends were examined (i) on annual crude numbers of OACD and (ii) on reported odds ratios of OACD calculated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 3738 cases of OACD were reported and the mean age of OACD cases was 35 years, 52% being women. The most frequent occupations were hairdressers, health care workers, cleaning staff and masons. The total number of OACD cases remained stable over the study period, but increases in OACD related to isothiazolinones (P = 0·002), epoxy resins (P = 0·012) and fragrances (P = 0·005) were observed. Conversely, decreases were noted for cement compounds (P = 0·002) and plant products (P = 0·031). These trends highlight specific sectors and exposures at risk of OACD. CONCLUSIONS: Trends in OACD depend on the nature of exposure. Observed decreases were consistent with prevention measures taken during the study period, and the increases observed serve to highlight those areas where preventative efforts need to be made to reduce skin allergies in the workplace.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Alérgenos/análisis , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Oportunidad Relativa , Distribución por SexoRESUMEN
Mesothelioma is a rare disease less than 0.3% of cancers in France, very aggressive and resistant to the majority of conventional therapies. Asbestos exposure is nearly the only recognized cause of mesothelioma in men observed in 80% of case. In 1990, the projections based on mortality predicted a raise of incidence in mesothelioma for the next three decades. Nowadays, the diagnosis of this cancer is based on pathology, but the histological presentation frequently heterogeneous, is responsible for numerous pitfalls and major problems of early detection toward effective therapy. Facing such a diagnostic, epidemiological and medico-legal context, a national and international multidisciplinary network has been progressively set up in order to answer to epidemiological survey, translational or academic research questions. Moreover, in response to the action of the French Cancer Program (action 23.1) a network of pathologists was organized for expert pathological second opinion using a standardized procedure of certification for mesothelioma diagnosis. We describe the network organization and show the results during this last 15years period of time from 1998-2013. These results show the major impact on patient's management, and confirm the interest of this second opinion to provide accuracy of epidemiological data, quality of medico-legal acknowledgement and accuracy of clinical diagnostic for the benefit of patients. We also show the impact of these collaborative efforts for creating a high quality clinicobiological, epidemiological and therapeutic data collection for improvement of the knowledge of this dramatic disease.
Asunto(s)
Mesotelioma , Neoplasias Pleurales , Francia , Humanos , Mesotelioma/patología , Patología Clínica , Neoplasias Pleurales/patología , Derivación y Consulta , Sociedades Médicas , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of pleural mesothelioma cases that can be attributed to asbestos exposure in France including non-occupational exposure. METHODS: A population-based case-control study including 437 incident cases and 874 controls was conducted from 1998 to 2002. Occupational and non-occupational asbestos exposure was assessed retrospectively by two expert hygienists. ORs of pleural mesothelioma for asbestos-exposed subjects compared to non-exposed subjects, and population-attributable risk (ARp) of asbestos exposure were estimated using a conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: A clear dose-response relationship was observed between occupational asbestos exposure and pleural mesothelioma (OR=4.0 (99% CI 1.9 to 8.3) for men exposed at less than 0.1â f/mL-year vs. 67.0 (99% CI 25.6 to 175.1) for men exposed at more than 10â f/mL-year). The occupational asbestos ARp was 83.1% (99% CI 74.5% to 91.7%) for men and 41.7% (99% CI 25.3% to 58.0%) for women. A higher risk of pleural mesothelioma was observed in subjects non-occupationally exposed to asbestos compared to those never exposed. The non-occupational asbestos ARp for these subjects was 20.0% (99% CI -33.5% to 73.5%) in men and 38.7% (99% CI 8.4% to 69.0%) in women. When considering all kinds of asbestos exposure, ARp was 87.3% (99% CI 78.9% to 95.7%) for men and 64.8% (99% CI 45.4% to 84.3%) for women. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the overall ARp in women is largely driven by non-occupational asbestos exposure arguing for the strong impact of such exposure in pleural mesothelioma occurrence. Considering the difficulty in assessing domestic or environmental asbestos exposure, this could explain the observed difference in ARp between men and women.
Asunto(s)
Amianto/toxicidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Mesotelioma/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pleurales/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Mesotelioma/epidemiología , Mesotelioma Maligno , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Neoplasias Pleurales/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Underreporting of occupational diseases related to asbestos exposure remains a matter of concern in France. The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of claims for compensation for asbestos-related non-malignant pulmonary or pleural occupational disease in subjects having undergone a chest CT-scan in a multiregional screening programme. METHODS: Among the 5444 voluntary retired asbestos-exposed subjects recruited in four regions between 2003 and 2005 who had undergone a chest CT-scan, the number of claims for compensation for an asbestos-related pulmonary or pleural benign disease was analysed in 2006 and 2010. RESULTS: Following CT-scan screening, 17.2% of participants were acknowledged as presenting with an asbestos-related non-malignant occupational disease, essentially pleural plaques, by the French National Health Insurance fund. Underreporting decreased as duration of follow-up after CT-scan increased. Nevertheless, 4 years after CT-scan, underreporting was still as high as 36% for subjects identified as presenting with pleural plaques. Mean duration between the date of CT-scan and the date of recognition as occupational disease was 7.4 months, shorter in cases where screening was coordinated by specialized centres. CONCLUSION: A plan of action for an easier claiming process for compensation of asbestos-related diseases is desired. This could probably be obtained through improved sensitization of physicians engaged in the follow-up of asbestos-exposed subjects, and by standardization of the interpretation and reporting of asbestos-related abnormalities observed on chest CT-scans.
Asunto(s)
Amianto/efectos adversos , Asbestosis/economía , Enfermedades Pulmonares/economía , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Pleurales/economía , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Indemnización para Trabajadores , Anciano , Asbestosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Asbestosis/epidemiología , Asbestosis/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Radiografías Pulmonares Masivas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Pleurales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pleurales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Pleurales/etiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Células Gigantes/patología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/patología , Pulmón/patología , Titanio/envenenamiento , Biopsia , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar , Humanos , Pulmón/ultraestructura , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/inducido químicamente , Microscopía Electrónica de RastreoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the relationship between pulmonary nodules detected by radiologists using computed tomography and cumulative exposure to asbestos or asbestos-related pleuro-pulmonary diseases in 5662 asbestos-exposed subjects, and the relationship between pulmonary nodules and thoracic cancer, to determine whether a specific surveillance strategy based on cumulative asbestos exposure should be adopted. DESIGN: Standardised incidence and mortality ratios (SIR) for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma were calculated in patients with and without mention of pulmonary nodules and compared using comparative morbidity figures. RESULTS: A significant excess incidence of primary lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma was observed among subjects presenting with pulmonary nodule(s) (SIR respectively 1.95, 95%CI 1.22-2.95, and 11.88, 95%CI 3.20-30.41). However, there was no significant relationship between pulmonary nodules mentioned by radiologists and cumulative asbestos exposure or between pulmonary nodules and the presence of asbestos-related benign diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the expected excess prevalence of lung cancer in subjects presenting with pulmonary nodules according to the radiologist's report, and shows the absence of relationship between the presence of nodules and level of cumulative asbestos exposure. Our study therefore offers no argument in favour of specific surveillance modalities based on estimated cumulative asbestos exposure.
Asunto(s)
Amianto/toxicidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pleurales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Anciano , Carcinógenos/toxicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Mesotelioma/inducido químicamente , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Mesotelioma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/patología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pleurales/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pleurales/patología , Vigilancia de la Población , Prevalencia , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite widespread press coverage of the harm caused by the asbestos, 40% of mesothelioma patients still do not file claims for compensation as an occupational disease. We aimed at studying elements that influence the administrative procedure of compensation, in particular social classes and instruction level. METHODS: This was a statistical analysis of data from the French national survey program of mesothelioma designed to understand social determinants of reporting occupational illness. Data from a give administrative district were then submitted to a qualitative study using in-depth interviews of patients with suspected mesothelioma. Discourse analysis was then applied to the corpus of information collected. Content analysis grouped the data into themes. RESULTS: The statistical analyses tended to show that the higher the educational level, the less often patients filed claims for their occupational disease. Manual workers asked for compensation for their disease more often than executives. The interviews conducted with suspected mesothelioma patients suggest several factors explaining these findings. The process of reporting an occupational disease is often initiated by the primary care physician who informs the patient about the possible link with a previous occupation, explains the procedure and motivate the patient whose main preoccupation is to fight against the illness, and less so to become recognized as a victim. In this context, the physician plays a fundamental role, independently of the patient's social status. CONCLUSION: Those results throw new light on the complexity of the administrative procedure for reporting occupational diseases in France and highlights possible causes of underdeclaration reporting. Physician awarness of these causes might improve identification of links between occupation and disease and the transmission of adapted information to all concerned patients in order to fight more effectively against the disparities resulting from underreporting.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Mesotelioma/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pleurales/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pleurales/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The relationships between benign asbestos-related diseases (asbestosis and pleural plaques) and thoracic cancers are still debated. The aim of this paper was to review the epidemiological data relevant to this issue. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE: Published studies show a significant relationship between occupational exposure to asbestos and lung cancer risk, even in the absence of abnormalities consistent with asbestosis on the postero-anterior chest x-ray. For a given cumulative asbestos exposure, the presence of radiographic evidence of asbestosis is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Among asbestos-exposed individuals, those having radiographic evidence of pleural plaques are at increased risk for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma, compared to the general population. However, there is no evidence that pleural plaque confers an increased risk of lung cancer or pleural mesothelioma within a population of individuals having the same cumulative asbestos exposure. PERSPECTIVES: The studies identified for this review relied only on chest radiograph data. Studies involving accurate evaluations of asbestos exposure and computed tomography of the chest are needed. CONCLUSION: Currently available data indicate that patient follow-up modalities should be dictated solely by the estimated cumulative asbestos exposure and not by the existence of pleural plaques.
Asunto(s)
Amianto/efectos adversos , Asbestosis/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Mesotelioma/epidemiología , Pleura/patología , Neoplasias Pleurales/epidemiología , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Fibrosis , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Mesotelioma/etiología , Exposición Profesional , Ocupaciones/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pleurales/etiología , RiesgoRESUMEN
A link between the inhalation of asbestos fibres and the outcome of benign and malignant respiratory diseases has been established from numerous epidemiological data in occupational settings. Occupational exposure limit values have been established with a gradual lowering of these over time. Conversely, there are few epidemiological data dealing with exposure in the indoor environment. However, numerous materials and products containing asbestos (MPCA) are present in the indoor environment, due to their widespread use in the construction sector in the years between 1960 and 1990. The regulations were changed from the late 1990s, leading to a systematic inventory of the presence of asbestos-containing materials in buildings. The aim of this manuscript is to clarify the different types of MPCA encountered in the indoor environment, to describe the techniques used to highlight asbestos depending on the nature of the materials, the regulatory requirements relating to asbestos in non-occupational situations, and to update on the state of knowledge on asbestos-related diseases in the indoor environment.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Amianto/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Contaminación del Aire Interior/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contaminación del Aire Interior/prevención & control , Materiales de Construcción/efectos adversos , Materiales de Construcción/normas , Restauración y Remediación Ambiental , Francia , Residuos Peligrosos , Artículos Domésticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Artículos Domésticos/normas , Humanos , Mantenimiento , Microscopía Electrónica , Fibras Minerales/efectos adversos , Fibras Minerales/análisis , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/etiología , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional , Eliminación de Residuos/métodos , Trastornos Respiratorios/epidemiología , Trastornos Respiratorios/etiología , Trastornos Respiratorios/prevención & controlAsunto(s)
Mesotelioma/terapia , Neoplasias Pleurales/terapia , Respiración , Sociedades Médicas , Cirugía Torácica , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico , Mesotelioma/etiología , Mesotelioma/patología , Neoplasias Pleurales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pleurales/etiología , Neoplasias Pleurales/patologíaRESUMEN
The potential health effects of fine and ultrafine particles are of increasing concern. A better understanding of particle characteristics and dispersion behavior is needed. This study aims at characterizing spatial and temporal variations in fine and ultrafine particle dispersion after emission from a model source in an experimental house. Particles emitted by an incense stick burning for 15 min were characterized. Number concentration, specific surface area and mass were measured. Partial chemical analysis of particles was also realized. Near the burning incense stick, the maximum concentration was 25,500 particles/cm(3); the indoor PM(2.5) concentration reached 197 microg/m(3), and the specific surface area concentration was 180 microm(2)/cm(3). The estimated incense smoke density was 1.1 g/cm(3). Time of Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer measurements indicated that the organic fraction was predominant in the aerosol mass detected, and other minor components identified were K(+), NO(3)(-), and Cl(-). The combustion of an incense stick in the living room was associated with significant modifications of the concentrations of particles measured in the different rooms of the house. This demonstration of pollution by particle dispersion by a model source of moderate intensity may have significant implications in terms of assessment of indoor exposure to such particles. Practical Implications The particles emitted in a domestic environment by a source of moderate intensity such as burning incense disperse throughout the house, even in rooms with closed doors and in rooms as far away as the next floor. This dispersion has significant implications in terms of evaluating human indoor exposure to fine and ultrafine particles.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Vivienda , Material Particulado/análisis , Humo/análisis , Conducta Ceremonial , Humanos , Tamaño de la PartículaRESUMEN
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumour but with increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. In 2008, the European Respiratory Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Task Force brought together experts to propose practical and up-to-dated guidelines on the management of MPM. To obtain an earlier and reliable diagnosis of MPM, the experts recommend performing thoracoscopy, except in cases of pre-operative contraindication or pleural symphysis. The standard staining procedures are insufficient in approximately 10% of cases. Therefore, we propose using specific immunohistochemistry markers on pleural biopsies. In the absence of a uniform, robust and validated staging system, we advice use of the most recent TNM based classification, and propose a three step pre-treatment assessment. Patient's performance status and histological subtype are currently the only prognostic factors of clinical importance in the management of MPM. Other potential parameters should be recorded at baseline and reported in clinical trials. MPM exhibits a high resistance to chemotherapy and only a few patients are candidates for radical surgery. New therapies and strategies have been reviewed. Because of limited data on the best combination treatment, we emphasise that patients who are considered candidates for a multimodal approach should be included in a prospective trial at a specialised centre.