A case of relapsed medulloblastoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and temozolomide.

We report a case of relapsed high-risk non-metastatic medulloblastoma in a 14-year-old boy, which was treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and temozolomide (TMZ). At the age of 11, the patient underwent an MRI-confirmed incomplete resection of a fourth-ventricle medulloblastoma, followed by conventional chemotherapy, craniospinal irradiation (55.8 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction) and then myeloablative chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue. After 18 months of complete remission following the completion of chemotherapy, MRI showed a 2.5-cm mass in the olfactory notch. The patient underwent IMRT (45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction) with concomitant administration of TMZ (180 mg/m2, 5 days every 21 days), which was well tolerated. After 5 cycles of TMZ, MRI showed complete remission with no evidence of the mass. TMZ was continued for another 5 cycles and then stopped. At 14 months from the completion of IMRT, a new MRI scan showed multiple nodular relapses around the fourth ventricle and the patient is currently treated with oral etoposide.

Regional hyperthermia added to intensified preoperative chemo-radiation in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of middle and lower rectum.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of delivering pre-operative regional hyperthermia (HT) plus an intensified chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) regimen in patients suffering from locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Between June 2000 and April 2006, 76 patients with locally advanced (cT3-4 N0/+) rectal adenocarcinoma were treated with HT plus CRT. HT was given once a week, to a total of five treatments, 1 to 4 h after radiotherapy (50 Gy with 2-Gy fractions for 5 weeks, plus a 10-Gy boost on the tumour bed, with the same fractionation schedule). Chemotherapy consisted in 5FU 200 mg/m(2) continuous infusion throughout the 6 weeks of irradiation and OXA 45 mg/m(2) in a weekly bolus. Surgery followed 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of HT plus CRT. RESULTS: HT plus CRT was generally well tolerated. At pathologic examination, there was a pathologic complete response (pCR) (ypT0 ypN0) in 18 out of 76 patients (23.6%), a partial response (PR) in 34/76 ones (44.7%) and a stable disease (SD) in 20/76 (26.3%) ones; 4/76 patients (5.2%) had a progression disease (PD) (distant metastases) at the time of surgery. Good predictors of a longer disease-free survival (DFS) were in order ypN status (log-rank test: p = 0.0008), ypT status (p = 0.002) and pCR (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRT combined with regional HT yielded acceptable toxicity. The rate of pCR was encouraging, although further studies are needed to prove the long-term efficacy of adding HT to CRT.

The role of hyperthermia in the battle against cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Hyperthermia, the heating of tumors to 41.5-43 degrees C, could be today considered the fourth pillar of the treatment of cancer. Employed for 20 years in Europe, the U.S.A. and Asia, hyperthermia, used in addition to radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery, increases both local control and overall survival, restores the chance of the surgery for inoperable tumors and allows a new low-dosage treatment of relapsed cancers previously treated with high radiotherapy dosage without increasing toxicity. METHODS: Hyperthermia can be either superficial, produced by a microwave generator, or regional, produced by a radiofrequency applicator with multiple antennas, which emanate a deep focalized or interstitial heating. RESULTS: The results are confirmed by phase III randomized trials, with level 1 evidence. A review of the international literature on hyperthermia, the experience of the University Hospital of Verona Radiotherapy Department (Italy) and a summary of the Symposium regarding the Evolution of Clinical Hyperthermia plus Radiotherapy during the Twentieth Congress of the French Society of Radiation Oncology (SFRO) are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperthermia is an important treatment modality in cancer treatment and its results are strongly supported by criteria of evidence-based medicine. Fifteen years of experience of the Radiation Oncology Department in Verona confirms the positive results obtained with international prospective trials, with level 1 evidence. Hyperthermia appears to be the fourth pillar beside surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy.