RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is an extracellular matrix-associated protein. Studies have revealed that SPARC is involved in the cell interaction and function including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. However, the role of SPARC in cancer is controversial, as it was reported as the promoter or suppressor in different cancers. Further, the role of SPARC in lymphoma is unclear. AIM: To identify the expression and significance of SPARC in lymphoma, especially in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: The expression analysis of SPARC in different cancers was evaluated with Oncomine. The Brune, Eckerle, Piccaluga, Basso, Compagno, Alizadeh, and Rosenwald datasets were included to evaluate the mRNA expression of SPARC in lymphoma. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-DLBCL was used to analyze the diagnostic value of SPARC in DLBCL. The Compagno and Brune DLBCL datasets were used for validation. Then, the diagnostic value was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The Kaplan-Meier plot was conducted with TCGA-DLBCL, and the ROC analysis was performed based on the survival time. Further, the overall survival analysis based on the level of SPARC expression was performed with the GSE4475 and E-TABM-346. The Gene Set Enrichment Analyses (GSEA) was performed to make the underlying mechanism-regulatory networks. RESULTS: The pan-cancer analysis of SPARC showed that SPARC was highly expressed in the brain and central nervous system, breast, colon, esophagus, stomach, head and neck, pancreas, and sarcoma, especially in lymphoma. The overexpression of SPARC in lymphoma, especially DLBCL, was confirmed in several datasets. The ROC analysis revealed that SPARC was a valuable diagnostic biomarker. More importantly, compared with DLBCL patients with low SPARC expression, those with higher SPARC expression represented a higher overall survival rate. The ROC analysis showed that SPARC was a favorable prognostic biomarker for DLBCL. Results of the GSEA confirmed that the high expression of SPARC was closely associated with focal adhesion, extracellular matrix receptor interaction, and leukocyte transendothelial migration, which suggested that SPARC may be involved in the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, KRAS, and myogenesis in DLBCL. CONCLUSION: SPARC was highly expressed in DLBCL, and the overexpression of SPARC showed sound diagnostic value. More interestingly, the overexpression of SPARC might be a favorable prognostic biomarker for DLBCL, suggesting that SPARC might be an inducible factor in the development of DLBCL, and inducible SPARC was negative in some oncogenic pathways. All the evidence suggested that inducible SPARC might be a good diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for DLBCL.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of small dose HAG combined with decitabine regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). METHODS: 134 elderly AML patients treated in our hospital from March 2015 to December 2018 were selected, and the patients were divided into CAG group and combined treatment group. The AML patients in CAG group was treated with CAG regimen, while the AML patients in combined treatment group was treated with small dose HAG regimen combined with decitabine. Efficacy was evaluated after treatment. RESULTS: After treatment, the OR rate of the patients in combined treatment group was significantly higher than that in CAG group (χ2=5.311, P=0.021). The nausea and vomiting rate, infection rate, myelosuppression rate, bleeding rate and intestinal discomfort rate showed no significant difference between the two groups (Pï¼0.05). The CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ levels of patients in combined treatment group were significantly lower than those in CAG group (Pï¼0.05). The result of followed-up for 2 years, showed that the overall survival rate of patients in combined treatment group was significantly higher than that in CAG group [(76.2±6.3)% vs (45.7±7.6)%] (χ2=4.214, Pï¼0.05), while the disease free survival rate of patients in combined treatment group were (57.4±7.7)%, which was significantly higher than that in CAG group (30.3±7.9)% (χ2=5.250, Pï¼0.05). CONCLUSION: Small dose HAG regimen combined with decitabine for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia has a certain curative efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Anciano , Citarabina , Decitabina , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term therapeutic efficacy, survival time and side effects in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with TCD regimen consisted of thalidomide, cyclophosphiamide and dexamethasone, and BCD reginen consisted of bortezomib, cyclophsphamide and dexamethasone. METHODS: The clinical data of newly diagnosed MM patients admitted in our hospital from January 2011 to January 2018 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. According to chemotherapectic regimen, 106 patients were divided into 2 groups: 53 cases in one group were treated with TCD regimen (TCD group), and 53 cases in another group were treaded with BCD regimen (BCD group). The therapeutic efficacy, median PFS and OS time and incidence of side effects in 2 groups were compared, at the same time the relationship of the remission degree and the factors in different subgroups with the therapeutic efficacy was analyzed in 2 groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the ≥MR rate between 2 groups (Pï¼0.05). The ≥PR rate, ≥VGPR rate and CR rate of BCD group were significantly higher than TCD group (Pï¼0.05). The median PFS time of patients in BCD group were significantly longer than that in TCD group (Pï¼0.05). There was no significant difference in the median OS time of patients between 2 groups (Pï¼0.05). The median OS time of ≥MR patients in TCD group was significantly longer than that of ï¼MR patients (Pï¼0.05). The median OS time of ≥PR patients in TCD group were significantly longer than that of ï¼PR patients (Pï¼0.05). The median OS time of ≥VGPR patients in BCD group was significantly longer than that of ï¼VGPR patients (Pï¼0.05). There was no significant difference in the median OS time of ≥PR and ï¼PR patients in BCD group (Pï¼0.05). The ORR of ≥VGPR patients in BCD group was significantly higher than that in TCD group (Pï¼0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of infection, fatigue, gastrointestinal reactions and bone marrow suppression between 2 groups (Pï¼0.05). The incidence of numbness in distal extremities and herpes zoster in BCD group was significantly higher than that in TCD group (Pï¼0.05). CONCLUSION: TCD and BCD in the treatment of patients with NDMM possess the same disease control effects; BCD regimen application can efficiently improve remission degree and prolong PFS time; but TCD regimen application have the advantages in reducing the side effects risk and improving treatment tolerance.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safely of DAC and CAG/HAG preexcitation chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of patients with MDS-RAEB (refractory anemia with excess blasts, RAEB). METHODS: The clinical data of 86 MDS-RAEB patients were analyzed retrospectively from February 2014 to February 2018. According to therapeutic regimem, the 86 patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (41 patients) with DAC preexcitation chemotherapy regimen, and group B (45 patients) with CAG/HAG preexcitation chemotherapy regimen; and the disease control effect, effective treatment course, median survival time and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between these 2 groups. RESULTS: The CR rate and ORR rate were not significantly different between these 2 groups (Pï¼0.05). The mCR rate in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (Pï¼0.05). The numbers of cases obtained therapeutic efficacy at 2 rd and 3 rd conrse in group A significantly more than those in group B (Pï¼0.05), but the number of cases obtained efficacy at 1 st course in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (Pï¼0.05). The median OS time was not significanly different between 2 groups (Pï¼0.05). The duration of neutrophils deficiency in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (Pï¼0.05). The transfusion volume of red blood cells and platelets in group A was significantly less than that of group B (Pï¼0.05). The incidence of neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia of III-IV grade at different treatment courses of group A were significantly lower than that in group B (Pï¼0.05). The incidence of infection of III-IV grade in group A at 3rd treatment course was significantly lower than that in group B (Pï¼0.05). CONCLUSION: Preexcitation chemotherapy regimens of DAC and CAG/HAG for the treatment of MDS-RAEB possess the same effects for disease control; application of DAC regimen can efficiently reduce the risk of adverse reaction, but CAG/HAG regimen can be helpful to accelerate the effective process of treatment.