Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 24(1): 217, 2024 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39333923

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) studies utilizing multireader multicase (MRMC) designs, missing data might occur when there are instances of misinterpretation or oversight by the reader or problems with measurement techniques. Improper handling of these missing data can lead to bias. However, little research has been conducted on addressing the missing data issue within the MRMC framework. METHODS: We introduced a novel approach that integrates multiple imputation with MRMC analysis (MI-MRMC). An elaborate simulation study was conducted to compare the efficacy of our proposed approach with that of the traditional complete case analysis strategy within the MRMC design. Furthermore, we applied these approaches to a real MRMC design CAD study on aneurysm detection via head and neck CT angiograms to further validate their practicality. RESULTS: Compared with traditional complete case analysis, the simulation study demonstrated the MI-MRMC approach provides an almost unbiased estimate of diagnostic capability, alongside satisfactory performance in terms of statistical power and the type I error rate within the MRMC framework, even in small sample scenarios. In the real CAD study, the proposed MI-MRMC method further demonstrated strong performance in terms of both point estimates and confidence intervals compared with traditional complete case analysis. CONCLUSION: Within MRMC design settings, the adoption of an MI-MRMC approach in the face of missing data can facilitate the attainment of unbiased and robust estimates of diagnostic capability.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Algoritmos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos
2.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1378682, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39161871

RESUMEN

Background: The relationship between epilepsy and risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is not fully understood. Evidence from the Stockholm Heart Study indicates that the risk of AMI is increased in people with epilepsy. This study aims to analyze the temporal trends in prevalence, adverse clinical outcomes, and risk factors of AMI in patients with epilepsy (PWE). Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with epilepsy with or without AMI and hospitalized from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, were identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The Cochran-Armitage trend test and logistic regressions were conducted using SAS 9.4. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for multiple variables. Results: A total of 8,456,098 inpatients were eligible for our analysis, including 181,826 comorbid with AMI (2.15%). The prevalence of AMI diagnosis in PWE significantly increased from 1,911.7 per 100,000 hospitalizations in 2008 to 2,529.5 per 100,000 hospitalizations in 2017 (Ptrend < 0.001). Inpatient mortality was significantly higher in epilepsy patients with AMI compared to those without AMI (OR = 4.61, 95% CI: 4.54 to 4.69). Factors significantly associated with AMI in PWE included age (≥75 years old vs. 18 ~ 44 years old, OR = 3.54, 95% CI: 3.45 to 3.62), atherosclerosis (OR = 4.44, 95% CI: 4.40 to 4.49), conduction disorders (OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 2.17 to 2.26), cardiomyopathy (OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 2.08 to 2.15), coagulopathy (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.54), dyslipidemia (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.27), peptic ulcer disease (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.33), chronic kidney disease (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.25), smoking (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.21), and weight loss (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.22). Conclusion: The prevalence of AMI in PWE increased during the decade. Mortality rates were high among this population, highlighting the need for comprehensive attention to prophylaxis for risk factors and early diagnosis of AMI in PWE by physicians.

3.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 11: 1382166, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38638883

RESUMEN

Purpose: Although the adverse effects of atrial fibrillation (AF) on cancers have been well reported, the relationship between the AF and the adverse outcomes in prostate cancer (PC) remains inconclusive. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of AF and evaluate the relationship between AF and clinical outcomes in PC patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PC between 2008 and 2017 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database. The trends in AF prevalence were compared among PC patients and their subgroups. Multivariable regression models were used to assess the associations between AF and in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, total cost, and other clinical outcomes. Results: 256,239 PC hospitalizations were identified; 41,356 (83.8%) had no AF and 214,883 (16.2%) had AF. AF prevalence increased from 14.0% in 2008 to 20.1% in 2017 (P < .001). In-hospital mortality in PC inpatients with AF increased from 5.1% in 2008 to 8.1% in 2017 (P < .001). AF was associated with adverse clinical outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality, congestive heart failure, pulmonary circulation disorders, renal failure, fluid and electrolyte disorders, cardiogenic shock, higher total cost, and longer length of hospital stay. Conclusions: The prevalence of AF among inpatients with PC increased from 2008 to 2017. AF was associated with poor prognosis and higher health resource utilization. Better management strategies for patients with comorbid PC and AF, particularly in older individuals, are required.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA