The advantages and disadvantages of a 'herbal' medicine in a patient with diabetes mellitus: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Patient-initiated alternative treatments in the management of chronic conditions are common and increasing in the United Kingdom. To date, there have been no reports of herbal medicine use alone in the management of diabetes mellitus. We report here the case of a man who attained excellent glycaemic control using a 'herbal' medicine and reveal how important it was to identify the products of active constituents. CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old man attending our clinic in Tooting, South London with known Type 2 diabetes, with evidence of both micro- and macro-vascular diabetes-related complications, was poorly controlled despite a drug regimen consisting of oral metformin and twice daily insulin. He went to India for at least 1 year and on returning to the clinic had excellent glycaemic control off all diabetic medication. While away he had started himself on a regimen of three different 'herbal' balls. Samples of blood were found to contain chlorpropamide in a therapeutic concentration; chlorpropamide was also found in one of the balls. He has been counselled on the potential risks associated with chlorpropamide and his treatment reverted to a more conventional treatment regimen. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners and hospital physicians should be alert to those patients returning from abroad on effective 'herbal' medications that these may in fact contain an active ingredient.

The influence of improved glycaemic control with insulin and sulphonylureas on acute phase and endothelial markers in Type II diabetic subjects.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Improved glycaemic control might reduce both microvascular and macrovascular complications of Type II diabetes (non-insulin-dependent) mellitus. To explore such possible mechanisms, we investigated the effects of intensive treatment on markers of endothelial dysfunction and of acute phase activation, using both sulphonylureas and insulin. METHODS: In a randomised cross-over study we gave sulphonylureas or insulin each for a period of 16 weeks to 22 poorly controlled Type II diabetic subjects who were being treated by diet. There was a 4 week washout period between each treatment. Subjects were studied at baseline and at the end of each treatment. RESULTS: Treatment with sulphonylureas and insulin resulted in similar improvements in glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin, baseline: 11.8 [(SD 2.2)%; after sulphonylureas: 8.6 (1.2)%,p < 0.001; after insulin: 8.6 (1.2)%, p < 0.001] and in insulin sensitivity ¿metabolic clearance rate of glucose, baseline: median 1.75 [interquartile (IQ) range 1.41, 2.27] ml x kg(-1) x min(-1); after sulphonylureas: 2.41 (1.82, 3.01) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1), p = 0.001; after insulin: 2.23 (1.92, 2.75) ml x kg(-1) min(-1), p = 0.027¿. There were no significant changes in concentrations of endothelial markers von Willebrand factor, cellular fibronectin, thrombomodulin, tissue plasminogen activator, soluble E-selectin or soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 or in urinary albumin excretion rate after either treatment period. Concentrations of C-reactive protein were not significantly influenced by sulphonylureas but fell after insulin [baseline: median 4.50 (IQ range 1.37, 6.44) microg x ml(-1); sulphonylureas: 2.69 (0.88, 9.65) microg x ml(-1) (p = 0.53); insulin: 2.07 (1.16, 5.24) microg x ml(-1) (p = 0.017)]. There were, however, no significant effects of either treatment on circulating concentrations of fibrinogen (p = 0.28-0.34) or of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 or tumour necrosis factor-alpha (p = 0.65-0.79). CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Markers of endothelial dysfunction and concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in Type II diabetes are not influenced by improved glycaemic control over 16 weeks. Improved metabolic control with insulin could, however, be associated with reduced concentrations of the acute phase marker C-reactive protein.

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in NIDDM: relationship with the insulin resistance syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: In order to examine the role of insulin-like growth factors in the pathogenesis of accelerated macrovascular disease in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), we investigated the relationship between the insulin resistance syndrome and the IGF axis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the relationship between insulin resistance syndrome variables and concentrations of IGF-1, IGF-2, IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 in 80 subjects with NIDDM. RESULTS: After correcting for age, sex and body mass index, concentrations of IGFBP-1, correlated with those of HDL-cholesterol (r = 0.40; P < 0.001), triglycerides (r = -0.24; P = 0.04), insulin (r = -0.39; P < 0.001), intact proinsulin (r = -0.32; P = 0.006), des 31,32 proinsulin (r = -0.40; P = 0.001), and with insulin sensitivity (r = 0.38; P = 0.001) and PAI-1 activity (r = -0.24; P = 0.05); IGF-1 levels only correlated with those of HDL-cholesterol (r = -0.33; P = 0.005), and this was not explained by IGFBP-1 or insulin sensitivity. With additional correction for insulin, concentrations of IGFBP-1 still correlated with HDL-cholesterol (r = 0.40; P < 0.001), but not those of triglycerides or PAI-1 activity. There were no significant relationships between levels of IGF-2 and any of the variables investigated, and IGFBP-3 levels only correlated with those of total cholesterol (r = 0.24, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In NIDDM, concentrations of IGFBP-1 are related to those of insulin, insulin sensitivity, serum lipoproteins and PAI-1 activity. The relationship between concentrations of IGFBP-1 and HDL-cholesterol is not explained by insulin. Concentrations of IGF-1 are linked to HDL-cholesterol, and this is not explained by levels of IGFBP-1. IGFBP-1 concentrations were related to PAI-1 activity, and this may be explained by insulin, which regulates the production of IGFBP-1 and PAI-1.

Effect of insulin versus sulfonylurea therapy on cardiovascular risk factors and fibrinolysis in type II diabetes.

In non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), cardiovascular risk factors improve during treatment, but whether insulin (I) differs from sulfonylurea (SU) therapy is unclear. To separate the contributions of improved diabetic control versus treatment regimen to risk factors, we examined the effects of SU and I on insulin sensitivity, basal and post-glucose load levels of insulin-like molecules, fibrinolysis, and lipid concentrations. Twenty poorly controlled, diet-treated NIDDM subjects were given I or SU each for a period of 16 weeks in a randomized crossover study, with a 4-week washout period between each treatment. Subjects were studied at the baselines (B1 and B2) and after each treatment. Treatment with I or SU produced similar improvements in glycemia (hemoglobin A1 [HbA1] B1, 11.7% +/- 2.1%; SU, 8.5% +/- 0.9%; I, 8.6% +/- 1.2%) and the metabolic clearance rate of glucose ([MCR-G] B1, 1.86 x/divided by 1.4; SU, 2.36 x/divided by 1.4 (P = .005 vB1); I, 2.27 x/divided by 1.4 (P = .07 vB1) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)). On SU therapy, subjects had higher fasting and post-glucose load levels of intact proinsulin compared with B1 and I (fasting, 13.9 x/divided by 2.6 v 9.5 x/divided by 2.2 (P = .004) and 9.1 x/divided by 2.4 pmol x L(-1) (P = .01), respectively). Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity and antigen were higher than at B1 on SU therapy (23.7 v 19.9 AU x mL(-1) (P = .02) and 47.6 v 32.2 ng x mL(-1) (P = .006), respectively), but not on I. There were no changes compared with B1 and no differences between the two therapies in total, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) cholesterol and triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein 2 (HDL2) and HDL3 cholesterol, apolipoprotein (apo) A1, A2, and B1, or lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels. In conclusion, (1) treatment with SU or I resulted in equal improvement in glycemia and insulin sensitivity, (2) intact proinsulin and PAI-1 antigen and activity were higher on SU, and (3) there were no differences in lipid concentrations with improved glycemia or between therapies.

The angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and the angiotensin II type I receptor gene as candidate genes for microalbuminuria. A study in nondiabetic and non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects.

Familial clustering of microalbuminuria with cardiovascular disease suggests a possible common genetic antecedent. We have tested the hypothesis that the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) DD genotype and the angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) gene C allele represent the common link between microalbuminuria and coronary heart disease. The frequency of polymorphisms of the ACE and AT1R genes were investigated in 509 nondiabetic white subjects and in 86 non-insulin-dependent diabetic white patients. There was no significant difference in albumin excretion rate between the genotypes in nondiabetic subjects on either a daytime or an overnight sample or in diabetic subjects expressed as a normalized albumin concentration on an untimed morning urine collection. We have found no evidence for an association between polymorphism of the ACE or AT1R genes and microalbuminuria in two groups of subjects without insulin-dependent diabetes.

Gene-environment interaction in the determination of levels of haemostatic variables involved in thrombosis and fibrinolysis.

Functional sequence changes in the promoter of a gene may have a direct effect on the rate of transcription and thus on cellular or plasma levels of the protein. For both the beta fibrinogen gene and the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) gene such functional variations have been described. For the fibrinogen gene a G/A sequence variation has been detected at position -455 of the promoter, with carriers of the A allele, representing roughly 20% of the population, consistently having 7-10% higher fibrinogen levels than those with the genotype G/G. For the PAI-1 gene we have detected a run of four or five Guanidine residues (4G/5G polymorphism), and in several published studies those homozygous for the 4G allele (25% of the population) having levels of PAI-1 roughly 30% higher levels than 5G5G individuals. The magnitude of both of these genotype effects indicates that they are likely to be of biological significance in causing an elevated risk of thrombosis and reduced fibrinolysis. However the magnitude of these effects are modulated by several environmental factors and data will be presented to demonstrate interaction between genotype and presence of ischaemic disease and physical exercise, in the determination of an individual's plasma fibrinogen levels and of triglycerides and diabetes in determining levels of PAI-1.

Relationships between plasma leptin and insulin concentrations, but not insulin resistance, in non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus.

In non-diabetic subjects, insulin concentrations and insulin resistance are clearly connected, and both correlate with leptin levels, making interpretations about mechanisms difficult. In non-insulin-dependent (Type 2) diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), however, insulin concentrations and insulin resistance are less closely associated. Therefore, we examined the relationship of plasma leptin concentrations within insulin resistance and insulin levels in 32 subjects with NIDDM, who underwent measurement of insulin resistance with an insulin sensitivity test. Plasma leptin was measured with an in-house monoclonal immunoradiometric assay. Fasting leptin level correlated with BMI (r = 0.78; p < 0.001), metabolic clearance rate of glucose (= -0.44; p = 0.015), and fasting specific insulin (r = 0.58; p = 0.001), but not with age, cholesterol, triglycerides or blood pressure (r = -0.26 to 0.21; p = NS). In linear regression analysis, after adjustment for BMI and gender, leptin concentrations correlated with those of insulin (partial r = 0.42; p = 0.025), but not insulin resistance (partial r = -0.10; p = NS). We conclude that in NIDDM, concentrations of plasma leptin are closely related to those of insulin per se and to obesity, but not to insulin resistance. Insulin may be an important regulator of leptin concentration in NIDDM.

Proinsulin-like molecules and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) activity in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects with and without myocardial infarction.

Elevated plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) activity has been shown to correlate with plasma insulin, proinsulin-like molecules, serum triglycerides and insulin sensitivity in both non-insulin dependent diabetic (NIDDM) subjects and subjects with coronary heart disease. We examined the relative roles of these variables in determining PAI-1 activity in four groups of male caucasian subjects: non-diabetic subjects with (n = 38) and without (n = 38) previous myocardial infarction (MI) and NIDDM subjects with (n = 26) and without (n = 30) previous MI. Insulin and proinsulin-like molecules were measured using specific two-site immunometric assays and insulin sensitivity estimated using the Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) model. Subjects were comparable in age and body mass index. In univariate analysis, there were significant correlations of PAI-1 activity with intact and des-31,32-proinsulin and serum triglycerides in non-diabetic subjects with (r = 0.52, P = 0.001; r = 0.58, P < 0.001; r = 0.41, P = 0.010) and without (r = 0.31, P = 0.056; r = 0.46, P = 0.006; r = 0.41, P = 0.011) MI, but not with plasma insulin or insulin sensitivity. In NIDDM subjects, PAI-1 activity correlated significantly with intact and des-31,32-proinsulin and serum triglyceride (r = 0.47, P = 0.015; r = 0.58, P = 0.002; r = 0.44, P = 0.026) only in subjects with MI. In multiple regression analysis, MI was the most important determinant of PAI-1 activity levels (r2 = 0.31, F = 55.6, P < 0.001). In conclusion, concentrations of proinsulin-like molecules and serum triglycerides appear to be stronger determinants of PAI-1 activity than plasma insulin or insulin sensitivity in both NIDDM subjects and non-diabetic subjects with and without MI. However, the relationship of MI with PAI-1 activity is independent of these variables.

The insertion allele of the ACE gene I/D polymorphism. A candidate gene for insulin resistance?

BACKGROUND: The insertion/deletion (ID) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been associated with increased coronary heart disease (CHD), although the mechanism of this association is not apparent. We tested the hypothesis that the deletion allele of the ACE gene is associated with insulin resistance. METHODS AND RESULTS: We related ACE genotype to components of the insulin-resistance syndrome in 103 non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) and 533 nondiabetic white subjects. NIDDM subjects with the DD genotype had significantly lower levels of specific insulin (DD 38.6, ID 57.1, and II 87.4 pmol.L-1 by ANOVA, P = .011). Non-insulin-treated subjects with the DD genotype had increased insulin sensitivity by HOMA % (DD 56.4%, II 29.4%, P = .027) and lower levels of des 31,32 proinsulin (DD 3.3, II 7.6 pmol.L-1, P = .012) compared with II subjects. There were no differences in prevalence of CHD or levels of blood pressure, serum lipids, or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity between the three ACE genotypes. In nondiabetic subjects there were no differences in insulin sensitivity, levels of insulin-like molecules, blood pressure, PAI-1, serum lipids, or CHD prevalence between the three ACE genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that increased cardiovascular risk of the DD genotype is not mediated through insulin resistance or abnormalities in fibrinolysis. Conversely, we report an increased sensitivity in NIDDM subjects with the ACE DD genotype.

Determinants of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 activity in treated NIDDM and its relation to a polymorphism in the plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 gene.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) activity is increased in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and may contribute to their excess risk of cardiovascular disease. We examined the determinants of PAI-1 activity in 146 NIDDM subjects by using specific assays of insulin and intact and des-31,32-proinsulin and measures of insulin resistance, relating these measurements to serum lipids, hypoglycemic therapy, and a common 4G/5G polymorphism in the promoter region of the PAI-1 gene. Subjects were treated with insulin, sulfonylurea, sulfonylurea plus metformin, metformin, and diet alone. In the whole group, PAI-1 activity correlated significantly with serum triglycerides (r = 0.39, P < 0.001), specific insulin (r = 0.29, P < 0.001), intact proinsulin (r = 0.24, P = 0.004), and des-31,32-proinsulin (r = 0.30, P < 0.001) and in subjects not on insulin (n = 110), with insulin sensitivity (r = -0.42, P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in PAI-1 activity among the three genotypic groups (P = 0.016); subjects with the genotype 4G/4G had PAI-1 levels one-third higher than those with the 5G/5G genotype. In the 4G/4G group, PAI-1 activity correlated significantly with triglyceride levels (r = 0.65, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in PAI-1 activity in the different treatment groups despite a significant difference in concentrations of intact and des-31,32-proinsulin. In a multiple regression model, insulin sensitivity and the interaction between PAI-1 4G/5G genotype and triglyceride were the strongest determinants of PAI-1 activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)