Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Can Fam Physician ; 60(8): 731-8, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25122819

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of presenting individualized colorectal cancer (CRC) risk information for increasing CRC screening rates in primary care patients at above-average risk of CRC. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Georgia Regents University in Augusta-an academic family medicine clinic in the southeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients (50 to 70 years of age) scheduled for routine visits in the family medicine clinic who were determined to be at above-average risk of CRC. INTERVENTIONS: Individualized CRC risk information calculated from the Your Disease Risk tool compared with a standard CRC screening handout. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intention to complete CRC screening. Secondary measures included the proportions of subjects completing fecal occult blood tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 1147 consecutive records were reviewed to determine eligibility. Overall, 210 (37.7%) of 557 eligible participants were randomized to receive either individualized CRC risk information (prepared by a research assistant) or a standard CRC screening handout. The intervention group had a mean (SD) age of 55.7 (4.8) years and the control group had a mean (SD) age of 55.6 (4.6) years. Two-thirds of the participants in each group were female. The intervention group and the control group were matched by race (P = .40). There was no significant difference between groups for intention to complete CRC screening (P = .58). Overall, 26.7% of the intervention participants and 27.7% of the control participants completed 1 or more CRC screening tests (P = .66). CONCLUSION: Presentation of individualized CRC risk information by a nonphysician assistant as a decision aid did not result in higher CRC screening rates in primary care patients compared with presentation of general CRC screening information. Future research is needed to determine if physician presentation of CRC risk information would result in increased screening rates compared with research assistant presentation.


Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/psicología , Intención , Sangre Oculta , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Anciano , Colonoscopía/psicología , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sigmoidoscopía/psicología , Sigmoidoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 27(2): 297-302, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24610194

RESUMEN

Tears of the peroneus brevis tendon may cause ankle pain, swelling, and instability. Supportive therapy with ankle bracing and analgesics is the mainstay of therapy, but surgical repair is often required in patients with ongoing symptoms. Surgical options include debridement, tubularization, or, in severe cases, resection of the damaged tendon and tenodesis. We describe a 64-year-old woman with a split peroneus brevis tendon presenting with lateral ankle pain, swelling, and instability, and we review the literature regarding presentation, diagnostic testing, pathophysiology, predisposing factors, and treatment recommendations. Primary care physicians should consider peroneal tendon injuries in patients with chronic lateral ankle pain and instability.


Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo , Artralgia/etiología , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/etiología , Traumatismos de los Tendones/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos de los Tendones/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA