Comparing the outcomes of rheumatic heart disease in pregnancy complicated with and without atrial fibrillation: A propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) may increase the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant with rheumatic valvular lesions (RHD). We aimed to assess the rate of occurrence of AF in pregnant with RHD and its impact on cardiac and maternal-fetal outcomes compared to those without it. METHODS: The study group consisted of pregnant women with RHD and AF (cases) and a matched comparison group of pregnant women with RHD but without AF (controls) was derived from the database of pregnant women with RHD receiving care at our center between 2011 and 2021. Incidence of composite adverse outcomes(maternal death, heart failure, or thrombo-embolic events) and pregnancy outcomes were compared between them. RESULTS: Seventy-one (5.1%; 95%CI 4.1%-6.4%) pregnant women with RHD had AF during pregnancy and childbirth, most occurring in the late second or early third trimester. New-onset AF was diagnosed in 34 (47.9%) of them. After matching, the incidence of composite outcome was higher in women with AF (77.5% (95%CI 66.3%-85.7%) compared to women without AF (17.3%(95%CI 13.3%-22.1%), P < .001), with seven (9.9%) maternal deaths among cases and two (0.7%) in controls. Heart failure was the most common adverse cardiac event (26.7% vs. 4.2%, P < .001, cases vs controls). Those with AF had higher odds (adjusted OR 56.6 (14.1-226.8)) of adverse cardiac outcomes after adjusting for other risk factors. The frequency of most non-cardiac pregnancy complications was similar in both groups. However, there was a trend towards a higher rate of miscarriage (16.9% vs. 9.9%), small-for-gestational-age babies(16.3 vs. 9.0%), and cesarean rates(31.9% vs. 18.3%) women with AF compared to those who did not experience AF. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation in pregnancy among women with RHD was associated with an increased risk of maternal morbidity and mortality, with a trend towards an increase in some non-cardiac pregnancy complications compared to those pregnant women without AF. Our study results provide background data for developing and implementing a pregnancy-specific management strategy tailored to middle-income settings.

Validation of Risk Stratification for Cardiac Events in Pregnant Women With Valvular Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Most risk stratification tools for pregnant patients with heart disease were developed in high-income countries and in populations with predominantly congenital heart disease, and therefore, may not be generalizable to those with valvular heart disease (VHD). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to validate and establish the clinical utility of 2 risk stratification tools-DEVI (VHD-specific tool) and CARPREG-II-for predicting adverse cardiac events in pregnant patients with VHD. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study involving consecutive pregnancies complicated with VHD admitted to a tertiary center in a middle-income setting from January 2019 to April 2022. Individual risk for adverse composite cardiac events was calculated using DEVI and CARPREG-II models. Performance was assessed through discrimination and calibration characteristics. Clinical utility was evaluated with Decision Curve Analysis. RESULTS: Of 577 eligible pregnancies, 69 (12.1%) experienced a component of the composite outcome. A majority (94.7%) had rheumatic etiology, with mitral regurgitation as the predominant lesion (48.2%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.884 (95% CI: 0.844-0.923) for the DEVI and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.753-0.863) for the CARPREG-II models. Calibration plots suggested that DEVI score overestimates risk at higher probabilities, whereas CARPREG-II score overestimates risk at both extremes and underestimates risk at middle probabilities. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that both models were useful across predicted probability thresholds between 10% and 50%. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant patients with VHD, DEVI and CARPREG-II scores showed good discriminative ability and clinical utility across a range of probabilities. The DEVI score showed better agreement between predicted probabilities and observed events.

Alternatives to Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Anticoagulation in Pregnant Women with Mechanical Heart Valves in Middle-Income Countries: A Cohort Study.

Objective: To compare cardiac complications and pregnancy outcomes in women with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) on two different anticoagulation regimens in a middle-income country. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes in pregnant women with MHVs that received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) throughout pregnancy versus sequential anticoagulation (heparins in the first trimester and peripartum period and VKAs for the remainder of pregnancy), at a tertiary centre in South India, from January 2011 to August 2020. Results: We identified 138 pregnancies in 121 women, of whom 32 received VKAs while 106 were on sequential anticoagulation. There were no differences between groups with regard to maternal deaths [0 vs. 6 (5.7%), p = 0.34], thromboembolic events [2 (6.3%) vs. 15 (14.2%), p = 0.36], haemorrhagic complications [4 (12.5%) vs. 12 (11.3%), p = 0.85], cardiac events [1 (3.1% vs. 17 (16%), p = 0.07], spontaneous miscarriages [5 (15.6%) vs. 13 (12.3%), p = 0.62], stillbirths [0 vs. 5 (5.4%), p = 0.581] or neonatal deaths [2 (8.7%) vs. 1 (1.1%), p = 0.11]. Both cases of warfarin embryopathy received >5 mg warfarin in the first trimester. Thromboembolic events were associated with subtherapeutic doses of heparin in the first and third trimesters and the early postpartum period. Fetal growth restriction and preterm birth complicated 34 (29.3%) and 26 (22.4%) pregnancies respectively. Conclusion: Pregnancy complications associated with MHVs in middle-income countries may be reduced by multidisciplinary surveillance, avoiding first-trimester warfarin if daily doses >5 mg and ensuring therapeutic levels of heparin during bridging in the first and third trimesters and peripartum period. Administration of low-dose aspirin should be considered as this may prevent placentally-mediated complications of pregnancy. Highlights: Pregnancy complications associated with MHVs in LMICs may be reduced by multidisciplinary surveillance, avoiding first-trimester warfarin if the daily dose is >5 mg, ensuring therapeutic levels of heparin in the first trimester and peripartum period.Placentally-mediated complications of pregnancy can be prevented by administering low-dose aspirin.Vitamin K antagonists or sequential regimen can be used as suitable alternatives to LMWH for anticoagulation in pregnant women with MHVs.