Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Evid Based Med ; 15(1): 39-54, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416433

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this overview is to identify and collate evidence from existing published systematic review (SR) articles evaluating various methodological approaches used at each stage of an SR. METHODS: The search was conducted in five electronic databases from inception to November 2020 and updated in February 2022: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and APA PsycINFO. Title and abstract screening were performed in two stages by one reviewer, supported by a second reviewer. Full-text screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal were performed by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included SRs was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 checklist. RESULTS: The search retrieved 41,556 unique citations, of which 9 SRs were deemed eligible for inclusion in final synthesis. Included SRs evaluated 24 unique methodological approaches used for defining the review scope and eligibility, literature search, screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal in the SR process. Limited evidence supports the following (a) searching multiple resources (electronic databases, handsearching, and reference lists) to identify relevant literature; (b) excluding non-English, gray, and unpublished literature, and (c) use of text-mining approaches during title and abstract screening. CONCLUSION: The overview identified limited SR-level evidence on various methodological approaches currently employed during five of the seven fundamental steps in the SR process, as well as some methodological modifications currently used in expedited SRs. Overall, findings of this overview highlight the dearth of published SRs focused on SR methodologies and this warrants future work in this area.


Asunto(s)
Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
2.
Indian J Dent Res ; 28(3): 330-336, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28722001

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the effect of various orthodontic bonding systems and clean up procedures on quantitative enamel colour change. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was done to identify the studies that assessed the quantitative enamel colour change associated with the various bonding systems and cleanup procedures. Electronic database (Pub Med, Cochrane and Google Scholar) were searched. First stage screening was performed and the abstracts were selected according to the initial selection criteria. Full text articles were retrieved and analyzed during second stage screening. The bibliographies were reviewed to identify additional relevant studies. RESULTS: Sixteen full text articles were retrieved. Six were rejected because the methodology was different. There was significant enamel colour change following orthodontic bonding, debonding and clean up procedures. CONCLUSION: Self-etching primers produce less enamel colour change compared to conventional etching. Resin Modified GIC produces least colour change compared to other light cure and chemical cure systems. Polishing following the clean-up procedure reduces the colour change of the enamel.


Asunto(s)
Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/efectos adversos , Cementos Dentales/efectos adversos , Esmalte Dental , Ortodoncia Correctiva/efectos adversos , Decoloración de Dientes/etiología , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo/métodos , Esmalte Dental/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Ortodoncia Correctiva/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...