Teaching Effective Informed Consent Communication Skills in the Virtual Surgical Clerkship.

BACKGROUND: The disruption by the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate medical education allowed for assessment of virtual curricular innovations. One of the difficulties encountered in the virtual curriculum is the teaching of clinical competencies that would traditionally require students to undergo in-person simulations and patient encounters. We implemented a novel informed consent activity module, with standardized patients, to improve self-efficacy in communication within our core surgery clerkship. STUDY DESIGN: All medical students who participated in the virtual surgery clerkship were recruited to participate in a retrospective survey study regarding the novel informed consent module. These questions evaluated their perceived competence in 4 domains relating to informed consent: identifying the key elements, describing common challenges, applying the New Mexico Clinical Communication Scale (NMCCS), and documenting. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 90 students participated in the study (38% of the cohort). Respondents to the survey reported that their self-efficacy in communication skills related to informed consent improved as a result of their participation in the activity in each of the 4 domains surveyed (p < 0.01), with the majority of students identifying as satisfactory or above in each domain post-module. Students generally viewed the virtual informed consent activity positively, but noted that it was not the same as an in-person clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: A virtual module of communication skills training, using standardized patients and faculty, improved students' belief in their self-efficacy in obtaining informed consent. This communication module can be useful in a virtual or mixed curricular structure for both current and future medical students.

Long term sexual function following rectal cancer treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Rectal cancer treatment can lead to sexual dysfunction. METHODS: We designed a retrospective survey-based study to quantify rates of sexual dysfunction in rectal cancer survivors. Patients that underwent surgery for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2016 at our institution were identified, and the following were distributed: Quality of Life measure for oncology (QoL-30), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). RESULTS: Survey response rate was 21%, 17 females and 30 males (n = 47). 50% of males recalled a physician asking about sexual function during or after treatments, compared to 18% of females (p = 0.034). More than 50% of those surveyed wished one of their physicians had discussed the possibility of sexual dysfunction. In men, the QoL-30 significantly correlated with IIEF orgasmic function (r = 0.50, p = 0.004) and IIEF overall satisfaction (r = 0.60, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that rectal cancer patients experience posttreatment sexual dysfunction, desire discussion with their physicians on this topic, and that there are gender differences in how providers approach counseling regarding posttreatment sexual dysfunction.