Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1366958, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577332

RESUMEN

Background: Although observational studies suggest a correlation between psoriasis (PS) and cancers, it is still unknown whether this association can replace causal relationships due to the limitations of observational studies. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal relationship between PS and cancers. Methods: PS genetic summary data were obtained from two genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We employed MR Base for individuals retrieving tumors from distinct locations. Inverse-variance weighted analysis was the principal method used for MR, supplemented by weighted median, MR Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode. To investigate the possible link between psoriasis and cancers, we performed two independent two-sample MR studies and a meta-analysis based on two independent MR analyses. Results: Two independent MR analyses both found no significant causal relationship between PS and overall cancers (OR=1.0000, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.9999-1.0001, P=0.984; OR=1.0000, 95% CI:0.9999-1.0001, P=0.761), and no significant causal relationship with 17 site-specific cancers. In the meta-analysis conducted by two two-sample MR analyses, there was no significant causal relationship between PS and overall cancers (OR=1.0000, 95% CI: 0.9999-1.0001, P=1.00, I 2 = 0.0%), and there was no significant causal relationship with 17 site-specific cancers. Conclusions: Our findings do not support a genetic link between PS and cancers. More population-based and experimental investigations will be required better to understand the complicated relationship between PS and cancers.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479372

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The link between cruciferous vegetables (CVs) and ovarian cancer (OC) is still uncertain. This meta-analysis intended to investigate the association between CVs consumption and the risk of OC, as well as to conduct a dose-response analysis to determine the degree of correlation between them. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases between database creation and October 2023. The present meta-analysis has been duly registered and assigned the registration number CRD42023470299. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. The statistical analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 software. RESULTS: There were a total of 7 cohort studies and 7 case-control studies with 7,269 cases and 742,952 subjects. The combined relative risk (RR) of the highest intake of CVs was 0.90 (95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.84-0.96; I2=54.7%; P=0.007) compared to the lowest intake of CVs. The odds ratio (OR) was 0.97 (95% CIs: 0.86-1.08; P=0.192) for case-control studies, and the RR was 0.79 (95% CIs: 0.67-0.91; P=0.167) for cohort studies. The intake of CVs and the risk of OC were linearly correlated. Adding 15 grams of CVs to the diet each day decreased the likelihood of developing OC by almost 4% (RR=0.963, 95% CIs: 0.905-1.025; P=0.235). CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of CVs may be linked to a lower risk of OC.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA