Evaluation of Sperm DNA Fragmentation Using Two Different Methods: TUNEL via Fluorescence Microscopy, and Flow Cytometry.

Background and Objectives: Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to any break in one or both of the strands of DNA in the head of a sperm. The most widely used methodologies for assessing sperm DNA fragmentation are the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), the sperm chromatin dispersion assay (SCD), the single-cell gel electrophoresis assay (SCGE-comet), and the terminal-deoxynucleotidyl-transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and sensitivity of the analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Materials and Methods: Semen samples were collected and analyzed for standard characteristics using light microscopy, and for sperm DNA fragmentation using both TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry. Results: There were no significant differences in the values of the sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) obtained when the analysis was performed using TUNEL or flow cytometry (p = 0.543). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between sperm motility (%) and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.01), as well as between sperm concentration and sperm DNA fragmentation (p < 0.05). The Mann-Whitney U test showed no significant difference in the DFI among couples with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and miscarriages (p = 0.352). Conclusions: Both methods (TUNEL via fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry) have a high efficiency and sensitivity in accurately detecting sperm DNA fragmentation, and can be effectively used to assess male fertility.

The human embryo following biopsy on day 5 versus day 3: viability, ultrastructure and spindle/chromosome configurations.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Are there any differences in viability, spindle abnormalities and mitochondrial and other organelle structures amongst embryos biopsied on day 3 versus day 5 before and after vitrification? DESIGN: A total of 240 day 3 biopsied embryos that developed to blastocysts but were rejected for transfer following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) (n = 115) or for aneuploidies (PGT-A) (n = 125) were divided into two groups: (i) 120 blastocysts treated for viability, spindle/chromosome configuration (SCC) analysis and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis (fresh n = 20, n = 20, n = 20 and following vitrification/warming n = 20, n = 20, n = 20); (ii) 120 embryos were re-biopsied at the blastocyst stage and treated for viability, SCC and TEM analysis (fresh n = 20, n = 20, n = 20 and following vitrification/warming n = 20, n = 20, n = 20). Also, 60 vitrified blastocysts biopsied only on day 5 that were rejected for transfer following PGT-M (n = 6) or PGT-A (n = 54) were treated following warming for viability (n = 20), SCC (n = 20) and TEM analysis (n = 20). RESULTS: No differences were observed in SCC and ultrastructure between embryos biopsied on day 5 and day 3 but following vitrification higher numbers of abnormal spindles, distension of mitochondria, multivesicular bodies, lipofuscin droplets, altered cell junctions and occasionally excessive accumulation of glycogen granules were evident. The fresh day 3 biopsied group also had a lower incidence of damaged (propidium iodide-stained) cells compared with the fresh day 3+5 (P = 0.02) and the vitrified day 5 (P = 0.001) biopsied groups. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsies on day 5 and day 3 do not adversely affect embryo viability, SCC or ultrastructure, although following vitrification minimal embryo quality-dependent increases in spindle abnormalities and cell damage are observed.

Case report: malignant teratoma of the uterine corpus.

BACKGROUND: Teratomas are the commonest germ cell tumours and are most frequently found in the testes and ovary. Extragonadal teratomas are rare and mainly occur in midline structures. Uterine teratomas are extremely rare with only a few previous case reports, usually involving mature teratomas of the uterine cervix. CASE PRESENTATION: We report an 82-year-old lady presenting with post-menopausal bleeding. Initial investigations revealed a benign teratoma of the uterus which was removed. Her symptoms persisted and a recurrent, now malignant, teratoma of the uterine corpus was resected at hysterectomy. Six months after surgery she relapsed with para-aortic lymphadenopathy and was treated with a taxane, etoposide and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen followed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: In this report we discuss the aetiology, diagnosis and management of uterine teratomas, and review previous case studies.