RESUMEN
Objective: The efficiency of ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) was established in terms of ovarian function recovery (95% of cases), number of live births (over 200 worldwide to date) and induction of puberty. Unfortunately, the lack of international registries and the fact that many centers have not yet reported their outcomes, lead to poor knowledge of the exact fertility data. The aim of the study is to describe our experience with OTT to restore ovarian function and fertility. Methods: This study was designed as a single-center, observational, retrospective, cohort study that includes women who underwent OTT between December 2012 and June 2023 at our center. After approval by the oncologist/hematologist, a small fragment of ovarian tissue was thawed and analyzed to detect the presence of micrometastases before OTT. Thawed ovarian tissue was grafted laparoscopically at multiple sites, including the remaining ovary and pelvic side wall (orthotopic transplantation) and/or abdominal wall (heterotopic transplantation). After OTT, ovarian function was monitored by hormonal assay, ultrasound and color Doppler at approximately 4-week intervals. Results: Between December 2012 and June 2023, 30 women performed OTT. Prior to OTT, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses revealed no micrometastases in all thawed ovarian tissue samples. In our series of 30 women, 20 of women were on premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), and the remaining ten cases still had oligomenorrhea and difficulty getting pregnant. Among the women with POI before OTT and at least 6 months follow-up, recovery of endocrine function was observed in all but one woman who underwent orthotopic transplantation (13 of 14 cases), in one out of two women who underwent both orthotopic and heterotopic transplantation (1 of 2 cases) and in all women who underwent heterotopic transplantation (4 of 4 cases). Women who underwent OTT to enhance fertility had no alterations in menstrual cycle and hormonal levels. In total, ten pregnancies were obtained in 25 women, resulting in four live births, two ongoing pregnancies and four spontaneous abortions. Conclusion: Our data can help patients and physicians in their discussions and decisions about the need and possibilities of preserving fertility.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Menopausia Prematura , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Criopreservación/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , UniversidadesRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic and recurrent disease defined as the presence and proliferation of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. It affects up to 6-10% of women of reproductive age and can be classified into superficial, ovarian, and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Deep infiltrating endometriosis can be associated with pain symptoms and pelvic floor muscle hypertone. Moreover, it may be responsible of bowel, urinary, and sexual dysfunctions with impairment of women's quality of life. Few studies have investigated the role of physiotherapy in women with DIE. Here, we aimed first to evaluate the effects of pelvic floor physiotherapy (PFP) on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions. Secondly, we aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrasound visual feedback during PFP on pelvic floor and subjective modifications in the frequency of sexual intercourse. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between June 2018 and December 2019 at our tertiary center. Nulliparous women with DIE and superficial dyspareunia were enrolled. At first examination, levator hiatal area (LHA) assessed with 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound, pain symptoms, urinary, bowel, and sexual functions were evaluated. Then, women were randomly assigned to no intervention (control group) or treatment with five individual sessions of PFP (experimental group), and after four months women underwent a second examination. Urinary, bowel, and sexual functions were assessed with validated questionnaires at first and second examinations. In particular, the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire was used to evaluate urinary symptoms, the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom questionnaire to assess the presence of constipation, and the Female Sexual Function Index to investigate sexual function. Study outcomes were the comparisons among groups in terms of differences in actual changes in median of questionnaire scores between first and second examinations. Results: Thirty women (17 in the experimental group and 13 in the control group) completed the study. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding urinary, bowel, and sexual functions, although women in the experimental group showed a tendency towards an improvement in constipation symptoms. Conclusion: In women with DIE, PFP does not appear to affect urinary, bowel, and sexual functions. Therefore, despite the improvement in superficial dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and PFM relaxation with high treatment satisfaction, women should be informed about the unclear impact of PFP on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions. Larger studies are necessary to further investigate the impact of PFP on these functions.