RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Childhood asthma is a highly prevalent chronic disease. A failure to implement patient education programmes may result in increased morbidity, despite the availability of distinct diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) tend to have a higher asthma prevalence. Moreover, the progression of asthma is significantly influenced by factors such as health literacy and the children's specific knowledge about the condition. With this trial, the primary objective is to evaluate whether asthma education enhances specific disease understanding in children with asthma (primary outcome). Secondary objectives include evaluating training effects on health literacy, retention rates of information, 'Children Asthma Control Test' (C-ACT) score, frequency of emergency room and physician visits (secondary outcomes) and whether SES influences training effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To address the research objectives, this study comprises two projects. The first subproject will investigate the influence of asthma training on the development of disease understanding and health literacy. The second subproject will analyse the influence of SES on the outcome of children participating in asthma training. This research is designed as a comparative, non-randomised study involving two paediatric groups between the ages of ≥7 and < 14 years. After being diagnosed with asthma, the intervention group undergoes standardised psychoeducational asthma training at a certified centre associated with paediatricians in private practice in Germany, following the recommendations of the 'Arbeitsgruppe Asthmaschulung im Kindes- und Jugendalter e.V.', a national association aiming to establish uniform and guideline-based standards for patient education in children and adolescents. The comparison group receives a significantly shorter period of education and instruction on the usage of asthma medication at outpatient clinics. Data will be collected from patients and their parents at three specific survey time points, based on standardised tools.To describe mean differences between the intervention and control group over time (subproject 1), a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be conducted. In subproject 2, multivariate linear regression analysis will be used to analyse the variables determining the changes in specific disease understanding and health literacy, including SES. The sample size calculation is based on a mixed ANOVA model with two groups and two measurements resulting in a total of 126 participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All protocols and a positive ethics approval were obtained from the Witten/Herdecke University, Germany (S-159, 2023; application submission: 24 June 2023, final vote: 10 July 2023). Furthermore, the study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00032423. The application submission was on 3 August 2023, and the final approval was on 4 August 2023. The results will be disseminated among experts and participants and will be published in peer-reviewed, international journal with open access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00032423.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Alfabetización en Salud , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Humanos , Asma/terapia , Niño , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados no Aleatorios como Asunto , AlemaniaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mepolizumab was originally intended as a therapeutic agent for atopic asthma in adults, and consequently, little is known about its use in children. Up to now, corticosteroids have formed the basis of the initial treatment of hypereosinophilic syndromes and are shown to be effective in most patients. To analyze the effect of mepolizumab in children is the aim of this study. METHODS: We are reporting the experience of the effect of mepolizumab in 2 pediatric patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome that was not sufficiently controlled by other drugs. In addition, the literature regarding the treatment with mepolizumab in pediatric and adult patients is reviewed for the most important studies regarding safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Mepolizumab therapy showed in 2 pediatric patients with severe hypereosinophilic syndrome a safe and efficient therapeutic approach. No significant intolerances appeared. Furthermore, treatment with systemic corticosteroids was terminated, and therefore, severe side effects were avoided in our pediatric cases. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IL-5 antibodies, which can be applied without substantial drug intolerances, are a new, safe, and effective treatment option for pediatric patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome.