[Proposal for initial management of uncomplicated ST elevation myocardial infarction in centers without percutaneous coronary intervention capacity in Peru]. / Propuesta de manejo inicial del infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST no complicado en centros sin capacidad de intervención coronaria percutánea en el Perú.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a clinical entity whose adequate treatment will depend on its prompt recognition, accurate diagnosis, and management in reperfusion networks. The first contact with these patients is generally done in centers without reperfusion capacity, attended by non-cardiologist doctors, and in centers far from hospitals with greater resolution capacity, something that is well known in our country. This manuscript proposes a strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of STEMI in centers without percutaneous coronary intervention capacity of the public health system in Peru, emphasizing not losing sight of electrocardiographic patterns compatible with coronary artery occlusion, adequate fibrinolysis and management of its complications, the treatment of infarction in special populations and highlighting the importance of the pharmacoinvasive strategy as the main form of reperfusion treatment in our country.

A randomized controlled trial of lung ultrasound-guided therapy in heart failure (CLUSTER-HF study).

BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a new tool for the evaluation of congestion in heart failure (HF); incorporation of LUS during follow-up may detect congestion earlier and prompt interventions to prevent hospitalizations. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the incorporation of LUS during follow-up of patients with HF may reduce the rate of adverse events compared with usual care. METHODS: In this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized into an LUS-guided arm or control arm. Patients were followed in 4 prespecified visits during a 6-month period. LUS was performed in every patient visit in both groups; however, LUS results were available for the treating physician only in the LUS group. The primary outcome was the composite of urgent HF visits, rehospitalization for worsening HF, and death from any cause. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized to either LUS (n = 63) or control (n = 63) (age 62.5 ±â€¯10 years, median left ventricular ejection fraction 31%). The primary end point occurred in 30 (47.6%) patients in the control group and 20 (31.7%) patients in the LUS group (P = .041). LUS-guided treatment was associated with a 45% risk reduction in the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.98, P = .044), mainly driven by a reduction in urgent HF visits (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.62, P = .001). No significant differences in rehospitalizations for HF or death were found. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of LUS into clinical follow-up of patients with HF significantly reduced the risk of urgent visits for worsening HF.