Differences in Positive Airway Pressure Requirements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Between Black and White Patients.

OBJECTIVE: There are disparities between Black and White patients in the utilization of positive airway pressure (PAP) alternatives for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Given low utilization rates among Black patients, there is limited knowledge of PAP alternative outcomes in this group. Therapeutic PAP levels are clinically accessible measures that have been shown to predict PAP alternative outcomes. Herein, we examined differences in PAP requirements between Black and White patients in a large clinical sample. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Academic sleep center. METHODS: We included OSA patients prescribed autoadjusting PAP between January 2018 and 2020 with baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 10. Mean and 90th percentile PAP levels were compared between White and Black patients who used PAP for ≥1 hour daily using linear regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), AHI, oxygen saturation nadir, and mask type. RESULTS: There were 157 Black and 234 White patients who were generally obese (BMI, 37.3 ± 8.7) with severe OSA (AHI, 36.9 ± 25.6). Black patients had a 0.68 cm higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36, 1.35) mean PAP level and 0.85 cm H2O higher (95% CI: 0.36, 1.35) 90th percentile PAP level than white patients. Although statistically significant, differences were small and not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: Black and White OSA patients had clinically insignificant differences in PAP requirements, suggesting comparable upper airway collapsibility. Considering the predictive value of therapeutic PAP levels, our findings suggest Black and White patients may have comparable PAP alternative responses from a collapsibility standpoint. Future studies should explore reasons for low utilization of PAP alternatives among Black patients.

Association Between Soft Tissue Measures From Computed Tomography and Upper Airway Collapsibility on Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Positive airway pressure (PAP) titration during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) provides objective measures of upper airway collapsibility. While skeletal measurements relate to collapsibility measures on DISE, the influence of soft tissue dimensions on upper airway collapsibility is not known. We analyzed the relationship of measures of upper airway soft tissue volumes, specifically soft palate, pharyngeal lateral walls, and tongue, with metrics of collapsibility. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis from a prospective cohort. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: Patients seeking PAP alternative therapies for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underwent standardized supine computed tomography (CT) acquisition and DISE protocols. The CT analysis primarily focused on soft tissue volumes and, secondarily, on airway and skeletal volumetric measures. DISE with PAP administration (DISE-PAP) enabled the determination of the pressure at which inspiratory airflow first commenced (pharyngeal critical pressure, PcritA) and the pressure at which inspiratory flow limitation was abolished (pharyngeal opening pressure, PhOP). Both unadjusted and adjusted correlation analyses were performed to understand the relationship between upper airway anatomy and either PcritA or PhOP. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine subjects completed both CT and DISE-PAP. On average, patients were male (70.5%), white (84.2%), middle-aged (56.6 ± 13.5 years), and overweight (29.6 ± 4.7 kg/m2), with moderate-severe apnea-hypopnea index (29.7 ± 21.3 events/h). Adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and skeletal volumes, soft palate, and lateral pharyngeal wall volumes were not associated with PhOP or PcritA, but a larger tongue was associated with more positive PhOP (⍴ = 0.20, P = .02), and more positive PcritA (⍴ = 0.16, P = .07). Exploratory analyses revealed smaller minimum cross-sectional retropalatal area and intramandibular volume were also associated with increased collapsibility measures. CONCLUSION: After controlling for clinical factors and skeletal volume, greater tongue volume was associated with more severe collapsibility during DISE. These results, in concert with previous work, suggest that greater tongue volume in a smaller skeletal dimensions contribute to the severity of airway collapsibility, a key driver of OSA pathogenesis.

The Prevalence of Sentinel Central Events (SCent) During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: With the recent addition of airflow and respiratory effort channels, our group has observed central and mixed apnea events during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). We measured the frequency and timing of sentinel central and/or mixed events (SCents), as well as assessed for differences in velum, oropharynx, tongue, and epiglottis (VOTE) classification compared to obstructive events. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective single-cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center. METHODS: Patients underwent DISE between June 2020 and November 2022. Nasal airflow, thoracoabdominal effort belt signals, and videoendoscopy were simultaneously captured. Demographics, sleep study, and DISE data were compared among patients with and without SCents using Student's T tests or χ2 tests. RESULTS: On average, the cohort (n = 103) was middle-aged (53.5 ± 12.1 years), overweight (body mass index of 29.7 ± 5.3 kg/m2), and had severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index of 30.7 ± 18.7 events/h). Forty-seven patients (46%) were found to have at least 1 SCent. Among those with SCent, 45 (95.7%) transitioned to obstructive pathology after an average of 7.91 ± 2.74 minutes, with at least 95% of patients expected to do so within 12.57 minutes. Twenty-nine out of 47 patients (61.2% [95% confidence interval: 46.4.9%, 75.5%]) with SCent had meaningful differences between central/mixed and obstructive VOTE scores. CONCLUSION: Central events were present in almost half of our cohort. At least 95% of patients were expected to transition to obstructive events within 12 to 13 minutes of propofol initiation. In addition, over half of patients demonstrate significantly different VOTE scores between central and obstructive events. These factors should raise awareness of central events and scoring passive apneas during DISE and consider delaying VOTE scoring.

The Application of Ultrasound to Quantify Hyoid Motion During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy.

INTRODUCTION: The significance of hyoid dynamics in OSA pathophysiology remains unclear. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is often used for evaluating patients intolerant to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. We performed DISE with concurrent hyoid-focused ultrasonography to quantify hyoid dynamics during obstructive and non-obstructive breathing. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis from a prospective cohort of patients undergoing DISE with PAP titration (DISE-PAP) and hyoid-focused ultrasound was conducted. Hyoid ultrasound was performed during obstructive breathing, and non-obstructive breathing after PAP administration. Motion was quantified by generating displacement curves based on echo-tracking hyoid movement. The image analysis protocol for quantifying hyoid displacement was performed independently by two researchers, and reliability of measures was assessed. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed for various clinical data and hyoid displacement during obstructive breathing. RESULTS: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria. On average, the cohort was male (75%), elderly (65.9 ± 10 years), overweight (29.3 ± 3.99 kg/m2 ), and with moderate-to-severe OSA (29.3 ± 12.5 events/h). Mean hyoid displacement during obstructive breathing was 5.81 mm (±3.48). In all patients, hyoid displacement decreased after PAP administration (-3.94 mm [95% CI: -5.10, -2.78]; p < 0.0001). Inter-rater reliability for measures of hyoid displacement was excellent. After multivariate regression, hyoid displacement at baseline was associated with higher AHI (ß [95% CI] = 0.18 [0.03, 0.33], p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: During DISE, hyoid displacement is greater during obstructive breathing with significant variability amongst patients. Further, these ultrasonographic measurements had excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability. Additional, larger studies are needed to understand contributors to hyoid mobility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:3221-3227, 2023.