Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 13: 915-921, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31239649

RESUMEN

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) management needs a combination of nonpharmacological and pharmacological modalities. However, as in many chronic conditions, the main concern with OA therapy is the difficulty in obtaining good medication compliance over a long period. The PREDOA study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of adherence to treatment in patients with OA treated with glucosamine sulfate (GS)-copper sulfate-ginger root (GCu), a symptomatic slow-acting drug for OA. Methods: Ambulatory patients with a clinical diagnosis of OA were included in a prospective (6 months) multicenter open-label observational study. All patients received two capsules of GS-GCu once daily for 6 months. Demographics, disease features (OA location, symptom duration, concomitant therapies, comorbidities), and patient self-assessment of pain (0-10) were obtained at baseline. At month 6, the investigator collected patient self-assessments of treatment observance, reasons for nonadherence, pain scores, patient perceptions of treatment efficacy, changes in analgesic intake, and occurrence of adverse events. Predictors of observance were studied in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 2,030 patients were included in the study. At baseline, the average pain score was 6.4±1.7. Observance was good in 80% of patients. It was weaker in active than retired patients (P=0.005) in patients not taking concomitant treatment (P=0.008) or who had never been treated for OA (P=0.001). Observance was correlated with pain decrease (P<0.0001) and with lack of adverse effects (P<0.001). Age, sex, pain level at baseline, OA location, and number of painful joints were not related to treatment compliance. Conclusion: Medication compliance with GS-GCu depends both on the safety-efficacy balance and several patient related-factors. To improve adherence, detailed information about therapeutic objectives is necessary in active patients who do not get any other medications and for whom it is their first treatment for OA. Clinical trial identifier: CCTIRS 14-371 B.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27891055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this survey was to assess retrospectively the interest of performing viscosupplementation using imaging guidance in patients suffering from ankle osteoarthritis (OA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective survey using a standardized questionnaire. Fifty patients suffering from ankle OA and treated, in daily clinical practice, with a single intra-articular injection of a novel viscosupplement made of a combination of a non-animal cross-linked hyaluronan and mannitol, HANOX M-XL, were included in the survey. The injection procedure (imaging or landmark guidance), demographic data, patient's self-evaluation of pain, satisfaction, treatment efficacy, and tolerability were collected. Predictive factors of both efficacy and patient's satisfaction were investigated. RESULTS: The percentages of patients very satisfied/satisfied and not really satisfied/dissatisfied with the treatment were 68% and 32%, respectively. Efficacy was rated as very good, good, moderate, and poor by 38%, 30%, 12%, and 20% of the cases, respectively. Efficacy was unrelated to gender and age and was highly correlated with pain score (P < 0.0001). In satisfied patients, the decrease in consumption of analgesics/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was >75% in 64% of the cases. Efficacy was significantly different with regard to imaging guidance. There was a statistically significant difference in efficacy and satisfaction between landmark-guided and imaging-guided injections (P = 0.02). The success rate was 2.3 times higher in the imaging-guided group than in the landmark-guided group. No significant difference was found between patients injected under fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance, despite a trend favoring ultrasound (P = 0.09). Tolerability was rated as very good/good in 47 patients, moderate in two, and poor in one and was unrelated to the type of guidance. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that the use of imaging guidance significantly optimizes the success rate of ankle viscosupplementation. No safety concern was observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

3.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 85(2): 127-34, 2006 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16428903

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Because the co-contraction of the gastrocnemius and hamstring muscles strains the anterior cruciate ligament, the role of the gastrocnemius muscle is of particular importance after semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. This study aimed to examine the neuromuscular mechanisms underlying postsurgical torque deficits during knee flexion by using surface electromyography. DESIGN: A total of 14 volunteer patients (eight men, six women; age, 32.5 +/- 9.3 yrs; height, 172.7 +/- 6 cm; weight, 69.6 +/- 10.2 kg) were enrolled in the study; all had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed by the same surgeon. The neuromuscular mechanisms were assessed using isometric tests and surface electromyographic recordings at 19 mos post-reconstruction. The torque deficits in the injured knee were compared with the uninjured knee, which served as control values. RESULTS: Significant differences in torque production were observed between the two limbs at specific angular positions during the extension and flexion tests (P < 0.05). The difference in the root mean square myoelectrical activity between the limbs was computed at each tested position, revealing that the gastrocnemius muscle had greater activity at 75 degrees than at 45 degrees (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In deep flexion (>70 degrees), the gastrocnemius muscle may compensate for the weakened hamstrings and thereby strain the anterior cruciate ligament graft after anterior cruciate ligament semitendinosus and gracilis tendon reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Contracción Isométrica/fisiología , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatología , Torque , Adulto , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/fisiopatología , Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Electromiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...