Absence of effects of prolonged simvastatin therapy on nocturnal sleep in a large randomized placebo-controlled study. Oxford Cholesterol Study Group.

1. It has been suggested that lipophilic HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, like lovastatin and simvastatin, may cause sleep disturbance. 2. Six hundred and twenty-one patients at increased risk of coronary heart disease were randomized in a single centre to receive 40 mg daily simvastatin, 20 mg daily simvastatin or matching placebo. To assess the effects of prolonged use of simvastatin on nocturnal sleep quality and duration, a sleep questionnaire was administered to 567 patients (95% of 595 survivors) at an average of 88 weeks (range: 44-129 weeks) after randomization. 3. The main outcome measures were sleep-related problems and use of sleep-enhancing medications reported during routine study follow-up visits, and responses to the sleep questionnaire about changes in sleep duration and about various sleep events during the preceding month. 4. No differences were observed between the treatment groups in the frequency of sleep-related problems reported, in the proportion of follow-up visits at which such problems were reported, or in the use of sleep-enhancing medications. The numbers who stopped study treatment were similar in the different treatment groups, and no patient stopped principally because of insomnia. In response to the sleep questionnaire, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups in reports of various sleep events during the preceding month, except that slightly fewer patients allocated simvastatin reported waking often. No differences in sleep duration were observed. 5. This placebo-controlled trial does not indicate any adverse effects of prolonged treatment with simvastatin on systematically sought measures of sleep disturbance.

Features affecting outcome during remission induction of acute myeloid leukaemia in 619 adult patients.

Six hundred and nineteen patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia, entered into the Medical Research Council's eighth trial of therapy have been studied. All patients were treated with the same remission induction regimen. Pretreatment variables comprising age, clinical status, haematological status and a detailed marrow cytology and cytochemistry score have been analysed. Poorer remission rates have been found in older patients, in those with lower Karnofsky scores and in patients with a platelet count of less than 25 X 10(9)/l. Leukaemias showing evidence of cytoplasmic maturation along the granulocyte and monocyte lines, as evidenced by granules, Auer rods, a high percentage of Sudan black positive blast cells and morphological and cytochemical abnormalities of neutrophils were associated with a higher remission rate. Marrow eosinophilia was a good prognostic feature. Nuclear features of immaturity, i.e. increasing numbers and prominence of nucleoli were associated with a low remission rate. Abnormalities of the erythroid series, notably Periodic acid-Schiff positivity which was present in 133 cases (22% of the total), was associated with a low remission rate. Patient age and pretreatment Karnofsky score were the most useful predictors of treatment outcome.

There is no such thing as ageing, and cancer is not related to it.

Several separate cellular processes have to accumulate in a normal cell to alter it into the seed of a growing carcinoma. Even though cancer is much commoner in the old than in the young, there is no good evidence whatever that these separate processes have any systematic tendency to take place more readily among old than among young adults. (Indeed, there are some instances in which carcinogenic treatments actually elicit cancer less rapidly among the old!) There are obvious evolutionary reasons why substantial cancer risks should be delayed until the end of the usual lifespan, and it appears that this is achieved chiefly not by having the component processes of neoplastic transformation themselves particularly dependent on age, but simply by requiring not one, but several, of them en route from full normality to full malignancy, and by giving at least some of them an extraordinarily low daily probability. The daily probabilities of these separate events are, of course, under evolutionary influence, and some of them appear to have changed by orders of magnitude over the tens of millions of years of evolution that separate humanity from various short-lived animals.