RESUMEN
Background: We aimed to elucidate the quantitative relationship between the neuromuscular blockade depth and intraoperative motor-evoked potential amplitudes. Methods: This prospective, single-arm, open-label, observational study was conducted at a single university hospital in Seoul, Korea, and included 100 adult patients aged ≥19 years undergoing brain tumor removal surgery under general anesthesia. We measured the neuromuscular blockade degree and motor-evoked potential amplitude in the deltoid, abductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior, and abductor hallucis muscles until dural opening. Results: The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model revealed the exposure-response relationship between the rocuronium effect-site concentration and motor-evoked potential amplitudes. The mean motor-evoked potential amplitudes decreased proportionally with increasing neuromuscular blockade depth. As the mean amplitude increased, the coefficient of variation decreased bi-exponentially. The critical ratio of the first evoked response to the train-of-four stimulation (T1)/control response (Tc) thresholds beyond which the coefficient of variation exhibited minimal change were found to be 0.63, 0.65, 0.68, and 0.63 for the deltoid, abductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior, and abductor hallucis muscles, respectively. Conclusions: Our results reveal that the motor-evoked potential amplitude exhibits deterioration proportional to the degree of neuromuscular blockade. In light of the observed bi-exponential decline of the coefficient of variation with the motor-evoked potential amplitude, we recommend maintaining a T1/Tc ratio higher than 0.6 for partial neuromuscular blockade.
RESUMEN
Purpose: To investigate the clinical factors associated with breast cancer (BRCA) dural metastases (DMs), their impact on prognosis compared to brain parenchymal metastases (BPMs) alone, and differences between DM subtypes, aiming to inform clinical decisions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 119 patients with BRCA with brain metastasis, including 91 patients with BPM alone and 28 patients with DM. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare the clinical characteristics between the two groups and within subtypes of DM. Overall survival after DM (OSDM) and the interval from DM to leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: DM was notably linked with extracranial metastasis, luminal-like BRCA subtype (p=0.033), and skull metastases (p<0.001). Multiple logistic regression revealed a strong association of DM with extracranial and skull metastases, but not with subtype or hormone receptor (HR) status. Patients with DM did not show survival differences compared with patients with BPM alone. In the subgroup analysis, nodular type DM correlated with HER2 status (p=0.044), whereas diffuse type DM was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of the luminal-like subtype (p=0.048) and the presence of skull metastasis (p=0.002). Patients with diffuse DM did not exhibit a significant difference in OSDM but had a notably shorter interval from DM to LMC compared to those with nodular DM (p=0.049). Conclusion: While the impact of DM on the overall prognosis of patients with BRCA is minimal, our findings underscore distinct characteristics and prognostic outcomes within DM subgroups.