The effect of agricultural land retirement on pesticide use.

Agricultural land retirement generates risks and opportunities for ecological communities and ecosystem services. Of particular interest is the influence of retired cropland on agricultural pests and pesticides, as these uncultivated lands may directly shift the distribution of pesticide use and may serve as a source of pests and/or natural enemies for remaining active croplands. Few studies have investigated how agricultural pesticide use is impacted by land retirement. Here we couple field-level crop and pesticide data from over 200,000 field-year observations and 15 years of production in Kern County, CA, USA to investigate: 1) how much pesticide use and applied toxicity are avoided annually due to the direct effects of retirement, 2) whether surrounding retirement drives pesticide use on active cropland and what types of pesticides are most influenced, and 3) whether the effect of surrounding retirement on pesticide use is dependent on the age or revegetation cover on retired parcels. Our results suggest about 100 kha are idle in any given year, which equates to about 1.3-3 M kg of pesticide active ingredients foregone. We also find retired lands lead to a small increase in total pesticide use on nearby active lands even after controlling for a combination of crop-, farmer-, region- and year-specific heterogeneity. More specifically, the results suggest a 10 % increase in retired lands nearby results in about a 0.6 % increase in pesticides, with the effect sizes increasing as a function of the duration of continuous fallowing, but decreasing or even reversing sign at high levels of revegetation cover. Our results suggest increasingly prevalent agricultural land retirement can shift the distribution of pesticides based on what crops are retired and what active crops remain nearby.

Screening ecological risk of pesticides and emerging contaminants under data limited conditions - Case study modeling urban and agricultural watersheds with OrganoFate.

The increasing number of chemicals used by society requires accessible, easy to implement tools to perform screening-level ecological risk assessments. However, field data to calibrate and validate screening tools is challenging to obtain for many watersheds. Thus, the evaluation must be done under data limited conditions. Here we employ a fate and transport model, OrganoFate, to predict environmental concentrations of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) as well as a number of pesticides. CECs evaluated include antibacterial compounds sulfamethoxazole and triclocarban and a flame-retardant tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate (TDCPP). We also evaluated widely used pesticides chlorpyrifos, bifenthrin and esfenvalerate. We predict concentrations of the contaminants in high-risk watersheds which were dominated by either urban or agricultural development and have small aquatic compartments. Screening-level predictions were in good agreement with observed concentrations in surface water and sediment. Maximum predicted concentrations were close to the highest observed concentrations for CECs, only ~0.1 µg/L greater for sulfamethoxazole and triclocarban concentrations, and for TDCPP <5 µg/L higher. ChemFate was also employed to screen possible aquatic health impacts. Results demonstrated possible CEC aquatic health risk for TDCPP and triclocarban (risk quotients of 0.9 and 1.1 respectively). For pesticides, exceedance of effect (EC50) and lethal (LC50) endpoints was predicted for various taxonomic groups which include aquatic invertebrates, fish, amphibians, and benthic organisms.