Progresión en glaucoma. Guía de práctica clínica / Glaucoma progression. Clinical practice guide

Objetivo Ofrecer una serie de recomendaciones generales que sirvan de orientación en la evaluación y el manejo de la progresión glaucomatosa en la práctica clínica diaria a partir de la evidencia clínica de calidad existente. Métodos Tras la definición de los objetivos y del alcance de la guía se constituyó el grupo de trabajo que formuló las preguntas clínicas estructuradas siguiendo el formato PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes). Una vez evaluada toda la evidencia clínica existente con las herramientas AMSTAR2 (Assessment of Multiple systematic Rewiews) y Risk of bias de Cochrane de forma independiente por al menos dos revisores, se pasó a la formulación de recomendaciones siguiendo la metodología del Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN). Resultados Se presentan recomendaciones con sus correspondientes niveles de evidencia que pueden ser de utilidad para la detección y el seguimiento de la progresión glaucomatosa con los distintos métodos disponibles y para el tratamiento de los pacientes. Conclusiones A pesar de que para muchas de las preguntas el nivel de evidencia científica disponible no es muy alto, esta guía de práctica clínica ofrece una revisión actualizada de los diferentes aspectos existentes relacionados con la evaluación y el manejo de la progresión glaucomatosa (AU)

Objective To provide general recommendations that serve as a guide for the evaluation and management of glaucomatous progression in daily clinical practice based on the existing quality of clinical evidence. Methods After defining the objectives and scope of the guide, the working group was formed and structured clinical questions were formulated following the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) format. Once all the existing clinical evidence had been independently evaluated with the AMSTAR2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) and Cochrane «Risk of bias» tools by at least two reviewers, recommendations were formulated following the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline network (SIGN) methodology. Results Recommendations with their corresponding levels of evidence that may be useful in the interpretation and decision-making related to the different methods for the detection of glaucomatous progression are presented. Conclusions Despite the fact that for many of the questions the level of scientific evidence available is not very high, this clinical practice guideline offers an updated review of the different existing aspects related to the evaluation and management of glaucomatous progression (AU)

Glaucoma progression. Clinical practice guide.

OBJECTIVE: To provide general recommendations that serve as a guide for the evaluation and management of glaucomatous progression in daily clinical practice based on the existing quality of clinical evidence. METHODS: After defining the objectives and scope of the guide, the working group was formed and structured clinical questions were formulated following the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) format. Once all the existing clinical evidence had been independently evaluated with the AMSTAR 2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) and Cochrane "Risk of bias" tools by at least two reviewers, recommendations were formulated following the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline network (SIGN) methodology. RESULTS: Recommendations with their corresponding levels of evidence that may be useful in the interpretation and decision-making related to the different methods for the detection of glaucomatous progression are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that for many of the questions the level of scientific evidence available is not very high, this clinical practice guideline offers an updated review of the different existing aspects related to the evaluation and management of glaucomatous progression.

Retinoblastoma: la importancia de su diagnóstico precoz / Retinoblastoma: The importance of early diagnosis

INTRODUCCIÓN: El retinoblastoma es el tumor intraocular maligno más frecuente en la infancia y tanto su curación como las secuelas derivadas del mismo dependen fundamentalmente de un diagnóstico precoz. En la actualidad, no existe consenso en su manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, no aleatorizado, de serie de casos (39 pacientes-58 ojos), tratados durante el período 2006-2013 en nuestro servicio, nombrado centro de Referencia Regional de Tumores por la Agencia de Calidad del SNS. RESULTADOS: El signo más frecuente de comienzo es la leucocoria (71,8%), seguido de estrabismo (17,9%). Todos los casos de tumoración bilateral presentaban mutación germinal del gen RB1 y un 20% tenían antecedentes familiares. El 55% de los pacientes presentaron estadio E, y el 90% precisó tratamiento quimioterápico. Un 57% de los que presentaban estadios leves, conservaron su ojo respecto al 43% que lo conservó en estadios avanzados. CONCLUSIONES: Este análisis consta de 58 ojos, sin que existan estudios previos en nuestra comunidad y pocas series tan numerosas en todo el país. Basado en tratamiento no estandarizados, eligiendo el más adecuado según las características del tumor. El manejo multidisciplinar, formado por oftalmología, oncología pediátrica, oncología radioterápica y radiofísica, es fundamental para la elección de tratamiento más correcta. La quimiorreducción junto a tratamientos de consolidación ofrece resultados esperanzadores en el control de los mismos, sobre todo en los de menor severidad. La enucleación continúa siendo de elección en las estadificaciones más avanzadas con afectación vítrea, poniendo de manifesto la importancia de su diagnóstico precoz

INTRODUCTION: Retinoblastoma is the most frequent malignant intraocular tumour in childhood, and both its cure and the sequelae arising from it, mainly depend on an early diagnosis. There is currently no consensus on its diagnostic and therapeutic management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective, and non-randomised study was conducted on a series of cases (39 patients -58 eyes), treated during the period 2006-2013, in the Regional Reference Centre for Tumours of the National Health Service Quality Agency. RESULTS: The most frequent presentation sign is leukocoria (71.8%), followed by strabismus (17.9%). All cases of bilateral tumour had a germline mutation of the RB1 gene, and 20% had a family history. Stage E was observed in 55% of the patients, and 90% required chemotherapy treatment. The eye was maintained in 57% of those who had mild stages, compared to 43% who maintained it in advanced stages. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis included 58 eyes. There are no previous studies in our community and there are few series so numerous throughout the country. Based on non-standardised treatment, the most appropriate is chosen according to the characteristics of the tumour. The multidisciplinary management, formed by ophthalmology, paediatric oncology, radiotherapy, and radiophysical oncology, is fundamental for the selection of the most appropriate treatment. Chemo-reduction, along with consolidation treatments, offers encouraging results in the control of these tumours, especially in those of less severity. Enucleation continues to be the method of choice in the most advanced staging with vitreous involvement, with the importance of early diagnosis being highlighted

Retinoblastoma: The importance of early diagnosis. / Retinoblastoma: la importancia de su diagnóstico precoz.

INTRODUCTION: Retinoblastoma is the most frequent malignant intraocular tumour in childhood, and both its cure and the sequelae arising from it, mainly depend on an early diagnosis. There is currently no consensus on its diagnostic and therapeutic management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A descriptive, retrospective, and non-randomised study was conducted on a series of cases (39 patients -58 eyes), treated during the period 2006-2013, in the Regional Reference Centre for Tumours of the National Health Service Quality Agency. RESULTS: The most frequent presentation sign is leukocoria (71.8%), followed by strabismus (17.9%). All cases of bilateral tumour had a germline mutation of the RB1 gene, and 20% had a family history. Stage E was observed in 55% of the patients, and 90% required chemotherapy treatment. The eye was maintained in 57% of those who had mild stages, compared to 43% who maintained it in advanced stages. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis included 58 eyes. There are no previous studies in our community and there are few series so numerous throughout the country. Based on non-standardised treatment, the most appropriate is chosen according to the characteristics of the tumour. The multidisciplinary management, formed by ophthalmology, paediatric oncology, radiotherapy, and radiophysical oncology, is fundamental for the selection of the most appropriate treatment. Chemo-reduction, along with consolidation treatments, offers encouraging results in the control of these tumours, especially in those of less severity. Enucleation continues to be the method of choice in the most advanced staging with vitreous involvement, with the importance of early diagnosis being highlighted.