Improving the weekend spinal ward round at a major trauma centre.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Documentation is key for communicating between members of the multidisciplinary team, allowing for better care, but documentation for spinal patients in the authors' centre was poor. METHODS: Every ward round encounter was analysed for six weekends. Data were analysed and presented to the department. A weekend ward round proforma was designed to help improve ward-round documentation. Ward round entries were then re-audited over four weekends to assess the usefulness of the new proforma. RESULTS: A total of 69 patient encounters were analysed in cycle 1, 58 in cycle 2 and 92 in cycle 3. In cycle 1, 80% of encounters had inadequate documentation. Following introduction of the ward round proforma there was a significant improvement in documentation in six out of fields, which was maintained in four out of seven fields 2 years later. CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that this improvement may avoid adverse effects on patient care, streamline doctors' time and reduce medicolegal consequences.

Implementing the "Getting It Right First Time" (GIRFT) Report Recommendations: The Results of Introducing a Shoulder and Elbow Multidisciplinary Team.

Objective In this study, we aimed to analyse the impact of implementing the "Getting It Right First Time" (GIRFT) recommendations in our shoulder and elbow unit, which included the introduction of a shoulder and elbow multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting for all patients being considered for surgery. Methods A retrospective patient case-note review was undertaken to assess the impact of replacing the pre-admission clinic with an MDT meeting. We analysed how many of the proposed management plans were changed as a result of this new MDT, as well as the associated cost savings. Results Of note, 118/148 patients who attended the MDT had a provisional operative plan; 24/118 (20%) had their plan changed to non-operative management, 13/118 (11%) had a change of operation, and 6/118 (5%) were recommended further investigations or tertiary referral. This reduced theatre time required by 47 hours, an estimated saving of over £51,000. Significantly, 20/24 patients who had their plan changed from operative to non-operative still had not had an operation after a median follow-up of 39 months. Conclusion The introduction of a shoulder and elbow MDT for all patients being considered for an operation has improved decision-making, allowed optimisation of non-operative management, and helped prevent patients from having unnecessary operations. This has led to a better patient experience and a more efficient service delivery, which is associated with cost savings.

Dual Surgeon Operating in Reverse Geometry Total Shoulder Replacement: The Learning Curve and Its Effects on Complication Rates.

Aims We analyse the impact of implementing dual surgeon operating for reverse geometry total shoulder replacement (RGTSR) as part of the "Getting It Right First Time" (GIRFT) recommendations in our shoulder and elbow unit, and the learning curve associated with it. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing operative time and complication rates in patients who underwent RGTSR performed by a single consultant surgeon versus two consultant surgeons over a six-year period in a single centre, in addition to an analysing the learning curve over the same period. Results A total of 74 RGTSRs were performed over a six-year period: 35 patients had a single surgeon perform their procedure and 39 had dual surgeon operating. Observed complication rates for RGTSR nearly halved following the introduction of dual surgeon operating (22.9% vs 12.8%, p=0.36). The complication rate for the first 37 cases was 9/37 (24.4%) versus 4/37 (10.8%, p=0.22) for the next 37 cases. Conclusion The implementation of dual surgeon operating may lead to reduced operative complications, provide cost savings to the hospital and produced several other non-tangible benefits to the surgeons and the department. An observed reduction in complication rates demonstrates the learning curve associated with this procedure.

Patient Satisfaction with Face-to-Face Follow-Up versus Telephone Follow-Up after Elective Day Case Hand Surgery.

Background: There has been increasing amounts of work on the use of telephone follow-up (TFU) in trauma and orthopaedics, but little direct work on its use in the follow-up of elective day case hand surgery. The aim of this study is to compare patient satisfaction with face-to-face follow-up (FFU) and TFU after elective day case hand surgery. Methods: Sixty-four patients from an FFU and 61 patients from a TFU cohort were contacted by telephone at least 6 months after their last follow-up. A customized questionnaire with answers recorded on a Likert scale (0-10) was used to evaluate their satisfaction with the follow-up they received. Results: Data from 48 patients from the FFU and 52 patients from the TFU cohorts were available for the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics between the two cohorts. Patient satisfaction was significantly greater in all domains of the questionnaire in the TFU cohort. Most patients from both cohorts (71% face-to-face, 86% telephone) said they would prefer TFU if they were to have the same procedure again. Conclusions: Patients were more satisfied with TFU compared to FFU following elective day case hand surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Remote Clinics During Coronavirus Disease 2019: Lessons for a Sustainable Future.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a focus on non-face-to-face (NF2F) orthopedic clinics. In this study, our aim was to establish whether NF2F clinics are sustainable according to the "triple bottom line" framework by taking into account the impact on patients, the planet, and the financial cost. Methodology This retrospective cohort study was carried out at a large district general hospital with 261 patients identified as having undergone face-to-face (F2F) or NF2F orthopedic consultations (April 2020). These patients were contacted by telephone to establish their experience, mode of transport, and preference for future consultations. Data were also collected relating to environmental and financial costs to the patient and the trust. Results The final analysis included 180 (69%) patients: 42% had an F2F consultation and 58% NF2F consultation. There was no significant difference between each group in terms of convenience, ease of communication, subjective patient safety, or overall satisfaction rating (p > 0.05). Overall, 80% of NF2F patients would be happy with virtual consultations in the future. The mean journey distance was 18.6 miles leading to a reduction in total carbon emissions of 563.9 kgCO2e (66%), equating to 2,106 miles in a medium-sized car. The hospital visit carbon cost (heating, lighting, and waste generation) was reduced by 3,967 kgCO2e (58%). The financial cost (petrol and parking) was also reduced by an average of £8.96 per person. Conclusions NF2F consultations are aligned to the National Health Service's "Long Term Plan": (i) delivering high patient satisfaction with equivalent outcomes as F2F consultations; (ii) reducing carbon emissions from transportation and hospital running; and (iii) becoming cheaper.

Improving the accuracy of digital templating: achieving success through stakeholder management.

The use of a marker ball in digital templating for hip arthroplasty is a well-established method of preoperative planning and is used to overcome the inherent magnification in plain film radiographs. Our hospital policy is to place a marker ball in all anteroposterior pelvic films taken in the emergency department (ED) which have been requested for suspected neck of femur fractures. We carried out a baseline measurement followed by three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles for all pelvic films taken in ED during July 2016, November 2016, February 2017 and November 2017. Interventions between the baseline measurement and cycle 1 were to educate the lead radiographer and publish the results in the radiology newsletter, and between cycles 1 and 2 was to run a teaching session for radiographers, display posters in the X-ray department and place an electronic prompt on the X-ray machine to alert them of the need to place a marker ball in the X-ray field. Cycle 3 looked to see if improvements were sustained. 16/81 (20%) radiographs complied with the policy in our baseline measurement; 25/51 (46%, p=0.002) in cycle 1; 40/54 (74%, p=0.0056) in cycle 2; and 48/63 (76%) in cycle 3. Our quality improvement project led to large improvements in clinical practice through straightforward, small, but appropriately targeted interventions. Stakeholder management is key to successfully implementing change. The next step is to switch from the VoyantMark to the KingMark marker ball, as it has greater accuracy of templating and is also easier to place within the field of an X-ray.

Improving the quality and speed of access to operation notes.

INTRODUCTION: Operation notes are often poorly completed, potentially compromising patient care. This project was undertaken to improve the quantity, quality and clarity of information included in operation notes, and make them easier to locate within a set of patient notes. METHODS: Operation notes were audited against standards laid out in national guidelines. The time taken for staff to locate an operation note, and information within it, was then measured. The layout was re-designed, followed by a re-audit. RESULTS: The number of operation notes with all measured domains completed rose from 4% to 34% (P<0.001). The mean time to locate the operation note fell from 30 to 4 seconds, and the mean time to locate all requested pieces of information within the operation note fell from 35 to 20 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: The interventions have improved quality and speed of access of operation notes, but there is still room for improvement.

More than 40 years' follow-up of an unconstrained metal lunate replacement for the treatment of Kienböck's disease.

Kienböck's disease is characterised by avascular necrosis of the lunate bone, and over the years it has been a challenging disease to manage, with differing opinions on the best intervention. We present an interesting case of a metallic unconstrained lunate replacement that is still functioning well in a patient 40 years after surgery. This case report represents the longest follow-up of any such prosthesis.

Improving documentation in surgical operation notes.

BACKGROUND: Accurate documentation in surgical operation notes is crucial in facilitating the postoperative care of surgical patients and forms an important medicolegal document. This study audited the quality and completeness of documentation in surgical operation notes at a single district general hospital against the Royal College of Surgeons (2014) Good Surgical Practice guidelines, and looked to improve clinical practice through improved compliance with these guidelines. METHOD: A total of 101 operation notes were audited from a variety of surgical specialities in November 2014 (cycle 1) and 100 notes in May 2015 (cycle 2). Documentation was audited against 19 standards found in the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines. The results were presented at the trust clinical governance meeting. Interventions included clinician education, aide memoires in theatres and the introduction of a new operation note. RESULTS: Six of the 19 standards had >90% compliance in cycle 1 and 12 out of 19 in cycle 2. There were dramatic improvements in documentation in many fields including time (4% to 60%, P<0.0001), elective or emergency procedure (1% to 83%, P<0.0001), problems or complications (67% to 100%, P=0.016), estimated blood loss (2% to 73%, P<0.0001), antibiotic prophylaxis (47% to 96%, P<0.0001), venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (43% to 83%, P<0.0001) and signature (78% to 97%, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This audit has demonstrated that significant improvements in documentation in operation notes can be achieved through simple interventions. The introduction of an improved operation note that addresses each standard from the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines helped to guide clinicians to include important and relevant information.

Anterior cruciate ligament injury: A persistently difficult diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Historically anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have been diagnosed poorly. A paper published in Injury in 1996 showed that less than 10% of patients with an ACL injury had the diagnosis made by the first physician to see them and that the average delay from first presentation to diagnosis was 21 months. The aim of our study was to investigate whether an improvement has been made over the last two decades in diagnosing ACL injuries. METHODS: We identified 160 patients who had an ACL reconstruction performed by a single surgeon between October 2004 and December 2011 and for whom a complete data set was available. Data was extracted retrospectively from the hospital notes and a dedicated patient database. We performed a sub-group analysis comparing patients seen prior to the introduction of an acute knee injury clinic in April 2007 and patients seen after the introduction of the clinic. RESULTS: 75.1% (120/160) of patients presented first to an emergency department (ED) or to their general practitioner (GP), but only 14.4% (23/160) were diagnosed on initial presentation. The median number of healthcare professionals a patient saw prior to a diagnosis of ACL injury was 3. The median delay from injury to presentation was 0 weeks (range 0-885), injury to diagnosis 13 weeks (0-926), presentation to diagnosis 10 weeks (0-924), presentation to a specialist knee clinic 24 weeks (0-1006), and specialist knee clinic to surgery 13 weeks (0-102). The median total time from injury to surgery was 42 weeks (0-1047). Following the implementation of an acute knee injury clinic in 2007, the median delay from presentation to surgery dropped from 59 weeks to 36 weeks (p = 0.050) and there was a significant decrease in the median delay from specialist knee clinic to surgery from 23 to 11 weeks (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Over the past two decades there appears to have been little improvement in the early diagnosis of ACL injuries, with only 14.4% of patients being diagnosed correctly at initial presentation. We recommend further education of emergency and primary care clinicians in the diagnosis of ACL injuries, emphasising the importance of the typical history of an ACL injury. The implementation of an acute knee injury clinic may help minimise delays to surgery, which should result in better patient outcomes.

Institutional Switch from Transfemoral to Transradial Vascular Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention was Associated with a Reduction in Bleeding Events: A Singlecenter Experience of >10,000 Consecutive Cases.

BACKGROUND: Transradial (TR) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces bleeding compared with transfemoral (TF) access, and may reduce mortality in specific patient subsets. However, switching from TF to TR access is associated with a learning curve and it is unclear whether benefits observed in randomized trials translate into practice. We sought to characterize the trends in bleeding and mortality rates at our institution, as we changed from being a TF to predominantly TR center over a 5-year period. METHODS AND RESULTS: 10,213 consecutive patients presenting for PCI were included (mean age 65.0 ± 11.6 years, 76.1% male, 48.0% PCI for acute coronary syndrome) over 5 years at a single center with PCI volume >2,000 cases per annum. Patients were stratified by initial arterial access site (TR or TF) and outcome measures included temporal trends in TR procedural failure, 30-day bleeding complications and all-cause 1-year mortality. TR procedural failure fell to a consistently low rate within 1 year (11.8% in 2008 to 2.9% in 2009, P < 0.001). As TR volume increased, the annual 30-day bleeding rate fell (1.64% in 2008 to 0.68% in 2012, P = 0.006). TR access predicted reduced 30-day bleeding (OR 0.17 [95%CI 0.07-0.38], P < 0.001), but was not a predictor of 1-year survival (HR 0.78 [95%CI 0.58-1.05], P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Successful transition from TF to TR PCI at our institution was rapid and associated with a reduction in 30-day bleeding. These data should encourage other centers considering the adoption of TR access.