Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 400(4): 931-45, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21249337

RESUMEN

Whole cell biosensors are the focus of considerable and increasing interest worldwide as methods for detecting and quantifying environmental toxicity, including biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), heavy metals, antibiotics, pesticides and herbicides. This review follows the development of whole cell biosensors from attempts to utilise changes in cellular metabolism to determine BOD and general toxicity, through the exploitation of unique metabolic pathways to detect specific toxicants, to the increasingly widespread use of genetic engineering to build new, and modify existing, sensing pathways.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Biosensibles/métodos , Células/metabolismo , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Sustancias Peligrosas/análisis , Bacterias/genética , Bacterias/metabolismo , Ecotoxicología/métodos
2.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 89(1): 179-88, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20938773

RESUMEN

The measured response of rapid biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) biosensors is often not identical to those measured using the conventional 5-day BOD assay. This paper highlights the efficacy of using both glucose-glutamic acid (GGA) and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) BOD standards as a rapid screen for microorganisms most likely to reliably predict real effluent BODs when used in rapid BOD devices. Using these two synthetic BOD standards, a microorganism was identified that produced comparable BOD response profiles for two assays, the MICREDOX® assay and the conventional 5-day BOD(5) test. A factorial experimental design systematically evaluated the impact of four factors (microbial strain, growth media composition, media strength, and microbial growth phase) on the BOD response profiles using GGA and OECD synthetic standard substrates. An outlier was identified that showed an improved correlation between the MICREDOX® BOD (BOD(sens)) and BOD(5) assays for both the synthetic standards and for real wastewater samples. Microbial strain was the dominant factor influencing BOD(sens) values, with Arthrobacter globiformis single cultures clearly demonstrating superior rapid BOD(sens) response profiles for both synthetic and real waste samples. It was the only microorganism to approach the BOD(5) response for the OECD substrate (171 mg O(2)L(-1)), and also reported BOD values for real waste samples that were comparable to those produced by the BOD(5) test, including discriminating between filtered and unfiltered samples.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/metabolismo , Técnicas Biosensibles/instrumentación , Oxígeno/metabolismo , Arthrobacter/química , Arthrobacter/crecimiento & desarrollo , Arthrobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Arthrobacter/metabolismo , Bacterias/química , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Medios de Cultivo , Cinética , Aguas del Alcantarillado/microbiología , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA