RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Objective parameters for decision on adaptive radiotherapy depend on patient, tumor and treatment related factors. Present study reports geometric uncertainties occurring during high precision radiotherapy, beam fluence analysis and serial exit dose measurement as a patient-specific tool for adaptive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial exit dose fluence of 24 patients (at baseline and mid-treatment) undergoing IMRT/VMAT treatment were measured. Baseline and midtreatment exit dose evaluation was done using gafchromic films in predefined region of interest. Difference of volume of GTV at baseline (from simulation CT scan) and midtreatment CBCT scan was calculated (ΔGTV). RESULTS: Population based systematic errors (mm) were 4.15, 2.26, 0.88 and random errors (mm) were 2.56, 3.69, and 2.03 in mediolateral (ML), craniocaudal (CC) and anteroposterior (AP) directions respectively. Gamma pass rate reduced with incremental shift. For a 5 mm shift, maximum deviation was found in anteroposterior axis (22.16 ± 7.50) and lowest in mediolateral axis (12.85 ± 4.95). On serial measurement of exit dose fluence, tumor shrinkage significantly influenced gamma pass rate. The mean gamma pass rate was significantly different between groups with 50% shrinkage of tumor volume (86.36 vs 96.24, P = 0.008, on multivariate analysis P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Rapid fall of gamma pass rate was observed for set up error of ≥3 mm. Serial measurement of exit dose fluence by radiochromic film is a feasible method of exit dose comparison in IMRT/VMAT, where EPID dosimetry is not available with linear accelerator configuration. Our study suggests that there is a significant difference between gamma pass rates of baseline and mid treatment exit dose fluence with greater than 50% tumor shrinkage.
Asunto(s)
Fantasmas de Imagen , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Humanos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias/patología , Carga Tumoral , Errores de Configuración en Radioterapia , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chemoradiation in head and neck carcinoma (HNC) shows significant anatomical resulting in erroneous dose deposition in the target or the organ at risk (OAR). Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can overcome this. Timing of significant target and OAR changes with dosimetric impact; thus, most suitable time and frequency of ART is unclear. METHODS: This dosimetric study used prospective weekly non-contrast CT scans in 12 HNC patients (78 scans). OARs and TVs were manually contoured after registration with simulation scan. Dose overlay done on each scan without reoptimization. Dosimetric and volumetric variations assessed. RESULTS: Commonest site was oropharynx. Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) reduced from 47.5 ± 19.2 to 17.8 ± 10.7 cc. Nodal GTV reduced from 15.7 ± 18.8 to 4.7 ± 7.1 cc. Parotid showed mean volume loss of 35%. T stage moderately correlated with GTV regression. CONCLUSION: Maximum GTV changes occurred after 3 weeks. Best time to do single fixed interval ART would be by the end of 3 weeks.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Carga Tumoral , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiaciónRESUMEN
Introduction: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of unintended death among Indian women. Cancer treatment-induced pain, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, body image, and sexual problems could affect the patient psychosocial well-being and quality of life (QOL). The study aims to determine the QOL and psychosocial well-being among women with breast cancer. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey completed by 244 women with breast cancer at a tertiary level teaching hospital. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire C30, the Breast Module (QLQ-BR23), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is used to measure the QOL, and psychological well-being, respectively. Appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics are applied to compute the results. Results: The total number of women with breast cancer interviewed was 244, with a mean age of 45.06 (standard deviation ± 11.17) years. The mean global health score was 70.97 ± 15.63. As per the QLQ-C30 scale, "physical functioning" scored the highest (70.54 ± 22.00), and "role functioning" reported the lowest (49.45 ± 36.15) mean score. Further, on the QLQ-C30 symptoms scale, "appetite loss" (45.09 ± 35.09) was the worst reported symptom, followed by "nausea and vomiting" (34.97 ± 38.39). On the BR-23 scale, body image said (68.42 ± 22.28) higher score than other domains and experience of arm-related problems (43.80 ± 26.06) were more frequently reported symptom in women. As per the HADS scale, 24.6% and 36.1% of women were in moderate anxiety and depression, respectively. The mean HADS score was 14.39 ± 5.82. Findings on predictors for the individual patient remained the same as that earlier published literature. Conclusions and Recommendations: Women with breast cancer have an overall good QOL and poor psychosocial well-being. However, using a holistic approach, including identifying psychological problems and their time management, signifies the need for the studied population.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Dolor en Cáncer , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Dolor/epidemiología , India/epidemiología , Náusea , VómitosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer treated with adjuvant hypofractionation radiotherapy with two different techniques, i.e., volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and their effects in terms of loco-regional control and adverse effects in terms of cutaneous, pulmonary, and cardiac outcomes are compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective non-randomized observational study. VMAT and IMRT plan for 30 breast cancer patients who were supposed to receive adjuvant radiotherapy were prepared using a hypofractionation schedule. The plans were dosimetrically evaluated. OBJECTIVE: Dosimetric comparative analysis of IMRT and VMAT in hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer is done and tested whether VMAT has a dosimetric advantage over IMRT. These patients were recruited for a clinical assessment of toxicities. They were followed up for at least three months. RESULT: On dosimetric analysis, planning target volume (PTV) coverage (PTV_ V95) of both VMAT (96.41 ± 1.31) and IMRT (96.63 ± 1.56) were similar with significantly lower monitor units required with VMAT plans (1,084.36 ± 270.82 vs 1,181.55 ± 244.50, p = 0.043). Clinically, all patients tolerated hypofractionation through VMAT (n = 8) and IMRT (n = 8) satisfactorily in the short term. No cardiotoxicity or appreciable falls in pulmonary function test parameters were observed. Acute radiation dermatitis poses challenges similar to standard fractionation or any other delivery technique. CONCLUSION: PVT dose, homogeneity, and conformity indices were similar in both VMAT and IMRT groups. In VMAT, there was high-dose sparing of some critical organs like the heart and lungs at the cost of the low-dose baths to these organs. Increased risk of secondary cancer will require a decade-long follow-up study to indict the VMAT technique. As we move toward precision in oncology, "one-size-fits-all" can never be an acceptable dictum. Each patient is unique and therefore we must offer, and the patient must "choose wisely."
RESUMEN
To date, cancer continues to be one of the biggest challenges for medical science. Nanotechnology has enabled us to overcome some of the limitations of conventional treatment in lung cancer therapeutics. Recently, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved certain nanomedicines for clinical administration against lung cancer. This article presents a narrative review of approved nanomedicines in lung cancer with a special focus on the results of recently concluded and ongoing clinical trials. The limitations associated with using nanomaterials as anti-lung cancer therapeutic agents and the possible mechanisms to overcome these limitations are also discussed.
RESUMEN
Introduction Recently, the one-week hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen (26 Gy in 5 fractions) for adjuvant breast radiotherapy has been shown to be non-inferior to other hypofractionated regimens (15-16 fractions). The aim of the present dosimetric study is to compare Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for a one-week hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen (26 Gy in 5 fractions) for adjuvant breast radiotherapy. Methods A total of 30 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the breast after breast conservation surgery (BCS) or modified radical mastectomy (MRM) were considered for in silico planning study. The dose prescription used was 26 Gy in 5 fractions as used in the FAST Forward protocol. Targets were contoured according to standard guidelines. The heart, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral breast were contoured as organs at risk. Results Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage: For IMRT, VMAT and 3D-CRT, respectively, the volumes that received at least 95% of the prescription dose (V95) were 95.7 ± 2.12, 92.47 ± 3.83, 90.87 ± 5.13; mean PTV doses (Dmean) were 26.1 ± 0.6, 25.7 ± 0.7, and 28 ± 4.39 (3D-CRT has higher Dmean compared to other techniques). Maximum PTV doses (Dmax) were 28.23 ± 0.72, 28.73 ± 0.64, and 29.8 ± 1.03. IMRT had a better V95 coverage and conformity index. Organs At Risk (OARs): The volumes that received at least 25% of the prescription dose (V25) of the heart were 3.41 ± 4.7, 1.8 ± 2.02 and 4.3 ± 6.98 in IMRT, VMAT and 3D-CRT, respectively. The volumetric (V25) comparison of heart dose in left-sided breast cancer was significantly different between VMAT and 3D-CRT (p=0.04, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The volume that received at least 5% of the prescription dose (V5 ) was less than 25% in the 3D-CRT plan (12.55). For the ipsilateral lung, the V25 parameters were 19.53 ± 10.96, 23.93 ± 13.58 and 20.5 ± 12.32 in IMRT, VMAT and 3D-CRT, respectively. Conclusion From this study, we can conclude that IMRT and VMAT techniques are feasible and can achieve better dosimetric goals for target and OARs though minimizing the area achieving low dose remains to be a dosimetric concern for VMAT.
RESUMEN
Purpose Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) by gamma (γ) analysis is an important component of high-precision radiotherapy. It is important to standardize institute-specific protocol. In this study, we describe our institutional experience of patient-specific QA for high-precision radiotherapy from a clinical perspective. Methods The planning data of 56 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included. γ index analysis was done using Octavius 4D IMRT QA phantom (PTW, Freiburg, Germany) using 3 mm/3% criteria. Local, global, and volumetric gammas were calculated and compared. The relationship of γ index in the transverse, coronal, and sagittal direction and anatomical region of treatment was explored. Results Global three-dimensional (3D) γ indices in the coronal, sagittal, and transverse axes were 96.73 ± 2.35, 95.66 ± 3.01, and 93.36 ± 4.87 (p < 0.05). The average local two-dimensional (2D) γ index was 78.23 ± 5.44 and the global γ index was 92.41 ± 2.41 (p < 0.005). The average local 3D γ index was 84.99 ± 4.24 and the global 3D γ index was 95.25 ± 1.72 (p < 0.005, paired t-test). The average local volumetric γ index was 84.29 ± 4.73 and the global volumetric γ index was 95.96 ± 2.08 (p < 0.005). 3D global gamma index was significantly different in different anatomical regions (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our study shows that γ index analysis is a useful parameter for routine clinical IMRT QA. The choice of type of γ index depends on the context of use and degree of stringency in measurement. Average 2D and 3D global γ were different in anatomical regions. The average 3D γ index was significantly different in axes. No difference was observed with techniques of IMRT/VMAT. Localization of failed points in CT anatomy can be advantageous for clinical decision-making.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been used to reduce dose to bone marrow (BM) irradiation during pelvic conformal radiotherapy by contouring bone marrow and sparing it during radiotherapy planning. The present study was done to compare CT & MRI for contouring bone marrow to spare functional bone marrow for Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in carcinoma cervix and to assess its effect on functional outcome. MATERIAL & METHODS: This prospective, observational study included newly diagnosed carcinoma cervix patients treated by radical chemoradiation. Patients were distributed in two arms i.e. CT arm and MRI for contouring bone marrow. Regions taken into consideration for bone marrow volumes contouring were 4th and 5th Lumbar vertebrae, whole pelvis and proximal femur upto lesser trochanter. In CT arm bone marrow regions were contoured using freehand method with window adjusted to bone range (Window - 2500/ Level - 400) and in MRI arm BM regions on the MR images that had pixel values similar to muscle or IDEAL IQ sequence based on fat fractions present in bone marrow (BM) was used to contour. RESULTS: 17 patients in CT arm and 19 patients in MRI arm were included. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of Bone Marrow Volume (cm3) (W = 171.500, p = 0.763). The mean value of V10, V20, V30 and V40 all were lower in group II (MRI) but the differences in volume were not significant. Bone marrow V30 in CT arm was found to correlate with absolute neutrophil count drop which was statistically significant in univariate (Coefficient - 1.00 [0.14-2.01, p = 0.025] and multivariate analysis (Coefficient - [1.08 (0.14 to 2.01, p = 0.025]). Bone marrow V30 in MRI arm was found to correlate with total leucocyte count percentage drop, which on multivariate analysis was statistically significant (Coefficient - 1.29 [0.29-2.28, p = 0.013]). CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric parameters of bone marrow V10 and V30 were found to be associated with absolute neutrophil and total leucocyte nadir respectively. Haematological toxicity was observed more in MRI arm but more propspective studies are required for further validation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Médula Ósea/diagnóstico por imagen , Médula Ósea/patología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Prospectivos , Cuello del Útero/patología , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Gallbladder (GB) Small Cell Carcinoma (SCC) is an uncommon entity with very poor prognosis. There is a paucity of literature regarding its natural history and management, with only 73 prior cases reported in the world literature. In this case report, we present three cases of SCC of the GB with varied presentations, clinical course, management, and outcomes along with a brief review of the available literature on this subject.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: External Beam Radiotherapy is the treatment of choice of locally advanced carcinoma cervix (LACC). The two techniques, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), have been compared previously in terms of outcomes and toxicities. IMRT has still not shown any benefit over 3DCRT in terms of local control and survival. Hence, the present study was conducted to compare local control and toxicities among both techniques. MATERIAL & METHODS: Fifty-four patients of LACC (FIGO IB2-IVA) were randomized to receive 50 Gray in 25 fractions by either 3DCRT or IMRT with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by brachytherapy. Plans were compared for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, dose to organs at risk (OAR), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI). Patients were assessed for acute toxicity and local control for three months. RESULTS: Out of 54 patients, 27 received treatment by 3DCRT and 27 by IMRT technique. Dosimetric evaluation for PTV coverage was similar in both arms. D15, D35, and D50 (dose to 15%, 35%, and 50% volume, respectively) for bladder were significantly reduced in the IMRT arm. Dosimetry for rectum and bowel bag was similar in both. There was a significantly decreased dose to femoral heads in the IMRT arm. Patients in the 3DCRT arm had significant grade 1 and 2 anemia and neutropenia compared to the IMRT arm. Local control for three months was similar in both the arms. CONCLUSION: IMRT is associated with decreased acute hematological toxicity compared to 3DCRT with similar local control. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess any difference in long-term toxicity and survival between the two arms.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread among cancer patients in India. OBJECTIVE: The present study elucidated usage patterns of CAM and the factors responsible for its adoption among the patients with cancer, and the therapeutic impact of CAM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a questionnaire-based study, conducted among patients with cancer in a tertiary care hospital in a sub-Himalayan city. Data were analyzed using statistical methods. RESULTS: A total of 2614 patients with cancer were included. Almost half of the patients (n = 1208, 46.2%) reported to have been treated with CAM. Breast cancer (n = 274, 23.0%) was most prevalent with majority at advanced stages. Ayurveda (n = 428, 35.9%) Yoga/Naturopathy (n = 381, 32.0%) Homeopathy (n = 143, 12.0%) and Unani (n = 71, 5.9%) were used commonly. Among CAM users, 85.0% (n = 1012) of patients used CAM as the sole method of treatment, while 58.9% (n = 702) patients reported initial symptomatic benefit. CONCLUSION: Using CAM benefitted a significant number of patients with cancer. However, there is an urgent need to integrate CAM with modern system of medicine.
RESUMEN
Introduction: The accuracy of dose calculation algorithms depends on the electron density and computed tomography (CT) number of medium scanned. Our study aimed to verify the impact of different CT scanning protocols on Hounsfield unit (HU) and effect on dose calculation algorithms. Materials and Methods: CIRS thorax phantom with different density material plugs was scanned at varying tube voltages from CT scanner and HU values were measured in treatment planning system (TPS). Calibration curves of electron density at different tube voltages were plotted and used for dose calculation with different calculation algorithms at varying high energy megavoltage photon energies. Results: Insignificant difference is obtained in electron density curves plotted at different tube voltages. The mean variation in HU values was found at different tube voltages for bone, lung, and water are 896.75 (standard deviation [SD] 122.88), -799.25 (SD 5.74), and -17.5 (SD 0.57), respectively. The estimated P values for change in HU values were 0.089, 0.258, and 0.121 for bone, lung, and water, respectively. Pencil beam (PB) convolution and collapsed cone algorithms show no significant dose difference, i.e., <1% variation and Monte Carlo (MC) shows maximum dose difference up to 1.4%. Conclusion: Third-generation algorithms such as MC shows dependence on varying tube voltages in dose calculation. Calibration curves plotted at different kVp in TPS advised to be chosen wisely to avoid any dosimetric errors in different medium.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer is the second most common cause of deaths worldwide. Likewise, in India, it is a major health problem, and disease burden is escalating every year. Cancer chemotherapy produces unfavorable effects on the well-being of an individual. Since the past few years, quality of life (QoL) is considered as the main goal of cancer treatment in the survival of a patient. AIM: This current study aimed to assess the QoL and factors affecting it in adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: An analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted to achieve the objectives, employing the consecutive sampling method. A total of 120 adult (>19 years) patients were recruited from daycare chemotherapy unit of a tertiary care hospital. The data were collected using patient record form and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), a quality of life (QoL) questionnaire. The overall mean score of quality of life (QoL) was 61.933 ± 5.85502. The domains of functional well-being and emotional well-being were most negatively affected after cancer chemotherapy. Education (illiteracy) and occupation (unemployment) were negatively associated with overall quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients on chemotherapy. Adverse drug reactions due to cancer chemotherapy negatively affect the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Education (illiteracy) affects social well-being domain of cancer patients. Working in the government/private sector has a positive impact on functional well-being domain of quality of life (QoL). CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest an overall low quality of life (QoL) among adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy at our setup. It has been identified as a stressful therapy, also affecting both psychological and physical well-being. Poor infrastructure, illiteracy, poverty, and lack of proper treatment facilities at most centres often lead to poor survival outcomes and hence focus has always been on achieving quantity of life rather than quality of life (QoL). This is further complicated due to nonavailability of validated tools in local vernacular, apathy of the treating physicians in the context of QoL aspects and social and cultural factors that are unique to this society. Psycho-oncology needs to become an integral entity of comprehensive cancer care.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy increases hazard of drug-drug interactions(DDIs), hospitalization, treatment toxicity, and mortality in elderly individuals with cancer. The present study explores and analyzes prevalence and severity of DDIs in geriatric cancer patients subjected to anticancer chemotherapy, their mechanisms, stratification of severity, and correlation between DDI risk and number of medications taken. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted between January-July 2019 at the Medical Oncology/Hematology and Radiation-Oncology Departments, All India Institute of Medical Sciences(AIIMS) Rishikesh. The study included a convenience sampling of 126 geriatric cancer patients. RESULTS: 126 patients were enrolled in present study. DDIs were identified in 97.6% of elderly cancer patients, and 88.9% had at least one DDI with antineoplastic medications. Highest number of DDIs involving antineoplastic medications in any given patient was 12. DDIs involving medications used for treatment of non-cancerous diseases were observed in 83.3% of patients; highest number of interactions identified in any given patient was 15. Out of 473 interactions, 237(50.1%) DDIs were attributable to pharmacodynamic mechanisms of action. 126(27%) of DDIs involved pharmacokinetic mechanisms and 110(23.6%) involved unknown mechanisms. In this present study, total number of DDIs could be positively correlated with total number of medications and number of health problems. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric cancer patients are at high risk of DDIs ascribable to polypharmacy. Physicians may utilize online DDI checking softwares to alert themselves, characterize potential DDIs, and modify medications judiciously. An integrative and algorithmic approach with inclusion of geriatricians, oncologists, cardiologists, general practitioners, and clinical pharmacologists/ pharmacists is imperative to optimize drug therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Polifarmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , India , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Primary synovial sarcoma of the lung (PSSL) is a rare tumour with only 0.5% incidence among other primary malignant lung tumours. Published medical literature regarding the natural history treatment protocol and clinical outcomes of PSSL remains limited. Here, we present a case of a 39-year-old man with primary synovial sarcoma with long-term follow-up, which was initially viewed as a metastasis from another unknown site. After evaluating histopathologically from the specimen post left lung metastasectomy and ruling out any other site for neoplastic changes, the diagnosis of PSSL was confirmed. Furthermore, this article reviews the literature and discusses various aspects of PSSL, including clinical presentation, radiological imaging and pathological characteristics, diagnostic dilemma, management and prognosis. This paper serves to provide an update and aims to enhance the understanding of PSSL. Timely diagnosis and treatment are imperative to achieve improved outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Sarcoma Sinovial/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biopsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Metastasectomía , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neumonectomía , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Sarcoma Sinovial/secundario , Sarcoma Sinovial/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "Any response to a drug which is noxious, unintended and occurs at doses used in man for prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy". Cancer chemotherapy is associated with the occurrence of ADRs, which is a worldwide problem. Monitoring and reporting of these ADRs are essential to safeguard the patient and to manage it accordingly. The outcome would create alertness and prevent their recurrence. Hence, we have undertaken a hospital-based study to study the frequency and nature of ADRs due to chemotherapeutic agents. METHODS: A total of 500 patients developed ADRs due to cancer chemotherapy from 13th April 2018 to 18th September 2019. Demographics of the patient, drugs taken, and ADRs encountered were recorded in a predesigned form. RESULTS: A total of 665 ADRs were recorded from 500 patients. Anemia was the most common ADR encountered followed by nausea/vomiting and leucopenia. Leukemia (s) were common cancer observed followed by lung and breast cancers. The most common drugs implicated were cisplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and doxorubicin. Naranjo's scale showed 92% of ADRs as probable and 7% as possible. Severity scale showed 80.2% of ADRs were of moderate (level 3 and 4) severity, 11.6% of mild (level 1 and 2) severity, and 8.2% of level 5 severity. A total of 26.8% of ADRs were deemed preventable and 73.2% were not preventable. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides safety data regarding the usage of anti-cancer drugs. Hence, it creates alertness among the treating doctors to prevent its recurrence.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Due to COVID 19 pandemic, the treatment of cancer patients has become a dilemma for every oncologist. Cancer patients are at an increased risk of immunosuppression and have a higher risk to acquire any infection. There are individual experiences from some centers regarding the management of cancer patients during such a crisis. So we have developed our institutional strategy to balance between COVID and cancer management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiation Oncology departmental meeting was held to prepare a consensus document on Radiotherapy schedules and department functioning during this pandemic. RESULTS: Strategies were taken in form of following areas were steps need to be taken to decrease risk of infection, categorise treatment on the basis of priority, radiotherapy schedules modification, academic meetings and management of COVID positive patient/personnel in Radiation Oncology department. CONCLUSION: We hope to strike the balance in overcoming both the battles and emerge as winners. Stringent long term follow up will be done for assessing the response or any unforeseen treatment related sequelae.