Signaling pathways leading to phosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3ß by activation of cloned human and rat cerebral D2and D3 receptors.

Although dopamine (DA) regulates the serine/threonine kinase Akt and its downstream substrate glycogen synthase kinase-3ß (GSK-3ß), the direct influence of dopaminergic receptors remains poorly characterized. Short-term incubation of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-expressed human (h)D(2L) and hD3) receptors with DA (maximal effect, 5-10 min) phosphorylated Akt (Thr308 and Ser473) and GSK-3ß (Ser9), actions blocked by the selective D2 and D3 antagonists, 3-[4-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-hydroxypiperidin-l-yl]methyl-1H-indole (L741,626) and (3aR,9bS)-N[4-(8-cyano-1,3a,4,9b-tetrahydro-3H-benzopyrano[3,4-c]pyrrole-2-yl)-butyl] (4-phenyl)benzamide (S33084), respectively. Similar findings were acquired with the specific D2/D3 receptor agonist quinelorane, which also enhanced (10 min after administration) levels of p-Akt and p-GSK-3ß in rat nucleus accumbens, an action blocked by the D2/D3 receptor antagonist raclopride. Akt and GSK-3ß phosphorylation mediated via CHO-expressed hD(2L) and hD3 receptors was prevented by pertussis toxin and by inhibitors of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors as well as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Src. Likewise, chelation of intracellular Ca²+ and interference with an "atypical" phorbol ester-insensitive protein kinase C (PKC) abolished recruitment of Akt and GSK-3ß. Inactivation of PKCµ blocked Akt and GSK-3ß phosphorylation at hD(2L) receptors. However, blockade of conventional PKC isoforms attenuated the actions of DA at hD3 receptors only. Furthermore, phospholipase C (PLC), calmodulin, and Akt inhibitors abolished DA-induced GSK-3ß phosphorylation by hD3 receptors, whereas phosphorylation by hD(2L) receptors partially involved calmodulin, Akt, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2. In conclusion, at both hD(2L) and hD3 receptors, DA elicited a G(i/o)- and Ca²+/calmodulin-dependent phosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3ß via transactivation of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor. However, significant differences were seen regarding the involvement of PLC, calmodulin, and ERK1/2.

S33138 [N-[4-[2-[(3aS,9bR)-8-cyano-1,3a,4,9b-tetrahydro[1]-benzopyrano[3,4-c]pyrrol-2(3H)-yl)-ethyl]phenylacetamide], a preferential dopamine D3 versus D2 receptor antagonist and potential antipsychotic agent: I. Receptor-binding profile and functional actions at G-protein-coupled receptors.

The novel, potential antipsychotic, S33138 (N-[4-[2-[(3aS,9bR)-8-cyano-1,3a,4,9b-tetrahydro[1]benzopyrano[3,4-c]pyrrol-2(3H)-yl)-ethyl]phenylacetamide), displayed approximately 25-fold higher affinity at human (h) dopamine D(3) versus hD(2L) (long isoform) and hD(2S) (short isoform) receptors (pK(i) values, 8.7, 7.1, and 7.3, respectively). Conversely, haloperidol, clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone displayed similar affinities for hD(3), hD(2L), and hD(2S) sites. In guanosine-5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)-triphosphate ([(35)S]-GTPgammaS) filtration assays, S33138 showed potent, pure, and competitive antagonist properties at hD(3) receptors, displaying pK(B) and pA(2) values of 8.9 and 8.7, respectively. Higher concentrations were required to block hD(2L) and hD(2S) receptors. Preferential antagonist properties of S33138 at hD(3) versus hD(2L) receptors were underpinned in antibody capture/scintillation proximity assays (SPAs) of Galpha(i3) recruitment and in measures of extracellular-regulated kinase phosphorylation. In addition, in cells cotransfected with hD(3) and hD(2L) receptors that assemble into heterodimers, S33138 blocked (pK(B), 8.5) the inhibitory influence of quinpirole upon forskolin-stimulated cAMP formation. S33138 had low affinity for hD(4) receptors (<5.0) but revealed weak antagonist activity at hD(1) receptors (Galphas/SPA, pK(B), 6.3) and hD(5) sites (adenylyl cyclase, 6.5). Modest antagonist properties were also seen at human serotonin (5-HT)(2A) receptors (Galpha(q)/SPA, pK(B), 6.8, and inositol formation, 6.9) and at 5-HT(7) receptors (adenylyl cyclase, pK(B), 7.1). In addition, S33138 antagonized halpha(2C) adrenoceptors ([(35)S]GTPgammaS, 7.2; Galpha(i3)/SPA, 6.9; Galpha(o)/SPA, 7.3, and extracellular-regulated-kinase, 7.1) but not halpha(2A) or halpha(2B) adrenoceptors (<5.0). Finally, in contrast to haloperidol, clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone, S33138 displayed negligible affinities for multiple subtypes of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor, muscarinic, and histamine receptor. In conclusion, S33138 possesses a distinctive receptor-binding profile and behaves, in contrast to clinically available antipsychotics, as a preferential antagonist at hD(3) versus hD(2) receptors.

Influence of positive allosteric modulators on GABA(B) receptor coupling in rat brain: a scintillation proximity assay characterisation of G protein subtypes.

Little is known concerning coupling of cerebral GABA(B) receptors to G protein subtypes, and the influence of positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) has not been evaluated. These questions were addressed by an antibody-capture/scintillation proximity assay strategy. GABA concentration-dependently enhanced the magnitude of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphao and, less markedly, Galphai(1/3) in cortex, whereas Gq and Gs/olf were unaffected. (R)-baclofen and SKF97581 likewise activated Galphao and Galphai(1/3), expressing their actions more potently than GABA. Similar findings were acquired in hippocampus and cerebellum, and the GABA(B) antagonist, CGP55845A, abolished agonist-induced activation of Galphao and Galphai(1/3) in all structures. The PAMs, GS39783, CGP7930 and CGP13501, inactive alone, enhanced efficacy and potency of agonist-induced [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galphao in all regions, actions abolished by CGP55845A. In contrast, they did not modify efficacies at Galphai(1/3). Similarly, in human embryonic kidney cells expressing GABA(B(1a+2)) or GABA(B(1b+2)) receptors, allosteric modulators did not detectably enhance efficacy of GABA at Galphai(1/3), though they increased its potency. To summarise, GABA(B) receptors coupled both to Galphao and to Galphai, but not Gq and Gs/olf, in rat brain. PAMs more markedly enhanced efficacy of coupling to Go versus Gi(1/3). It will be of interest to confirm these observations employing complementary techniques and to evaluate their potential therapeutic significance.

Characterisation of Gs activation by dopamine D1 receptors using an antibody capture assay: antagonist properties of clozapine.

Herein, we examined the direct coupling of human dopamine D1 receptors to G(s) proteins using an antibody capture assay together with a detection technique employing scintillation proximity assay beads. Using a specific antibody, dopamine (DA) and the selective dopamine D1 receptor agonists, 6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF81297) and 3-allyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF82958), behaved as high-efficacy agonists ( approximately 100%) in stimulating guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding to G(s) in L-cells, whereas 2,3,4,5,-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF38393) displayed partial agonist properties (70%). The action of dopamine was specifically mediated by human dopamine D1 receptors inasmuch as the selective human dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, (R)-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-benzazepine-7-ol (SCH23390), blocked dopamine-induced [35S]GTP gamma S binding to G(s) with a pK(B) (9.29) close to its pK(i) (9.33). The antipsychotic agents, clozapine and haloperidol, displayed no intrinsic activity when tested alone and inhibited dopamine-stimulated G(s) activation with pK(B)'s of 6.7 and 7.3, respectively, values close to their pK(i) values at these sites. In conclusion, the use of an anti-G(s) protein immunoprecipitation assay coupled to scintillation proximity assays allows direct evaluation of the functional activity of dopamine D1 receptors ligands at the G protein level. Employing this novel technique, the typical and atypical antipsychotics, clozapine and haloperidol, respectively, both exhibited antagonist properties at dopamine D1 receptors.

Differential activation of Gq/11 and Gi(3) proteins at 5-hydroxytryptamine(2C) receptors revealed by antibody capture assays: influence of receptor reserve and relationship to agonist-directed trafficking.

As determined by a guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assay, which does not distinguish G protein subtypes, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and 2(S)- 1-(6-chloro-5-fluoro-1H-indol-1-yl)-2-propanamine fumarate (Ro600175) behaved as full agonists at human 5-HT(2C) (h5-HT(2C)) receptors (VSV isoform) stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, whereas 1-2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl-2-aminopropane (DOI), d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and lisuride exhibited partial agonist properties. After treatment with pertussis toxin to uncouple 5-HT(2C) receptors from Gi/Go but not Gq/11, DOI and LSD were as efficacious as 5-HT and Ro600175 in stimulating [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, whereas lisuride still exhibited low efficacy (40%). Correspondingly, in a scintillation proximity assay employing specific antibodies against Gq/11, 5-HT, Ro600175, DOI, and LSD behaved as high-efficacy agonists, whereas lisuride showed efficacy of 36%. In contrast, when employing a specific antibody recognizing Gi(3), DOI and LSD were less efficacious (80 and 30%, respectively) than 5-HT and Ro600175, and lisuride was inactive. Agonist actions were specifically mediated by h5-HT(2C) receptors inasmuch as the selective 5-HT(2C) antagonist SB242,084 blocked [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding at both Gq/11 and Gi(3). Agonist potency for stimulation of Gi(3) was ~6- to 8-fold less than for Gq/11, indicating that the latter was preferentially engaged by h5-HT(2C) receptors. Inactivation of h5-HT(2C) receptors with the alkylating agent N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline did not modify the efficacy of 5-HT, Ro600175, and DOI at Gq/11, whereas their efficacies were substantially reduced at Gi(3), indicating a greater receptor reserve for the former. Finally, the preferential activation of Gq/11 versus Gi(3) by DOI, LSD, and lisuride was diminished in the presence of lower receptor number. In conclusion, h5-HT(2C) receptors couple to both Gq/11 and Gi(3) in CHO cells, and efficacy for G protein subtype activation is both ligand- and receptor reserve-dependent.