RESUMEN
Background: Obesity is a well-established risk factor of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), however the impact of obesity on surgical outcomes for racial and ethnic minority patients with RCC is unclear. This study investigated whether a higher body mass index (BMI) or obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) was associated with worse perioperative outcomes and if there were heterogeneous effects based on race, ethnicity, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic factor. Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, medical records of patients who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess associations of BMI and perioperative outcomes [ischemia time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of hospital stay]. Results: A total of 432 patients, including 49.8% non-Hispanic White (NHW), 35.0% Hispanic, and 6.9% American Indian (AI) patients, were included. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] BMI was 30.2 (26.3-35.2) kg/m2, and Hispanic (31.5) and AI (32.5) patients had higher median BMI than NHW (29.1) patients (P=0.006). Median ischemia time, EBL, and length of hospital stay were 18.5 (IQR, 15.0-22.4) minutes, 150 (IQR, 75.0-300.0) mL, and 3 (IQR, 2-5) days. BMI ≥35 kg/m2 was associated with a longer ischemia time [>18.5 minutes; odds ratio (OR), 5.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.81-14.76; P=0.002], and the association was stronger in NHW than Hispanic patients (BMI continuous OR, 1.13; 95% CI: 1.04-1.22; P=0.004 in NHW and OR, 1.07; 95% CI: 0.98-1.17; P=0.12 in Hispanics). Class I and II/III obese patients had over two-fold increased odds of a larger EBL (>150 mL) than patients with normal weight (OR, 2.17; 95% CI: 1.03-4.59; P=0.04 for class I and OR, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.04-4.84; P=0.04 for class II/III obese patients). This association was stronger in patients from neighborhoods with high social deprivation index (SDI) and in NHW patients (BMI ≥30 vs. <30 kg/m2, OR, 3.53; 95% CI: 1.57-7.97; P=0.002 in high SDI neighborhoods and OR, 2.38; 95% CI: 1.10-5.14; P=0.03 in NHW). BMI was not associated with a longer hospital stay. Conclusions: In this study, obesity increased likelihood of worse perioperative outcomes, and the associations varied based on race and ethnicity and neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors.
RESUMEN
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common form of bladder cancer (BC) and is the variant with the most immunogenic response. This makes urothelial carcinoma an ideal candidate for immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Key immune checkpoint proteins PD-1 and CTLA-4 are frequently expressed on T-cells in urothelial carcinoma. The blockade of this immune checkpoint can lead to the reactivation of lymphocytes and augment the anti-tumor immune response. The only immune checkpoint inhibitors that are FDA-approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma target the programmed death-1 receptor and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) axis. However, the overall response rate and progression-free survival rates of these agents are limited in this patient population. Therefore, there is a need to find further immune-bolstering treatment combinations that may positively impact survival for patients with advanced UC. In this review, the current immune checkpoint inhibition treatment landscape is explored with an emphasis on combination therapy in the form of PD-1/PD-L1 with CTLA-4 blockade. The investigation of the current literature on immune checkpoint inhibition found that preclinical data show a decrease in tumor volumes and size when PD-1/PD-L1 is blocked, and similar results were observed with CTLA-4 blockade. However, there are limited investigations evaluating the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. We anticipate this review to provide a foundation for a deeper experimental investigation into combination immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lactation has long term effects on maternal health, but the relationship between lactation and long-term handgrip strength, a marker of musculoskeletal function and healthy aging, has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: Examine the relationship between total lifetime breastfeeding duration (BFD) and midlife handgrip strength. METHODS: We measured handgrip strength as a marker of overall strength among 631 women in the Project Viva cohort. At the same visit, women reported their BFD for each birth, and we derived total lifetime BFD. We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate associations of lifetime BFD in months with midlife handgrip strength in kilograms, adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, marital status, household income, age at first pregnancy and age at handgrip strength assessment. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) age was 50.7 (5.1) years, lifetime BFD was 21.6 (19.5) months, and handgrip strength was 28.0 kg (6.0) in the dominant and 26.0 kg (5.6) in the non-dominant hand. In fully adjusted models, each 3-month increment in lifetime BFD was associated with 0.10 kg (95% CI 0.02, 0.18) higher handgrip strength for the dominant hand and 0.10 kg (95% CI 0.03, 0.18) for the nondominant hand. Results were similar in models examining mean BFD per pregnancy rather than total BFD. There was no evidence of effect modification by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that there is a small beneficial effect of lifetime BFD on handgrip strength. Future studies can explore mechanisms by which BFD affects body composition and associations with other outcomes related to lean mass such as sarcopenia.
