RESUMEN
Purpose: Since pediatric zirconia crowns (ZRCs) are prefabricated, they may be sterilized following try-in for re-use. Possible changes in color stability, gloss, and translucency were evaluated for four brands of prefabricated zirconia crowns following autoclave and cold sterilization. Methods: Sixteen maxillary right central incisor prefabricated ZRCs were obtained from NuSmile ®, Sprig, Cheng Crowns, and Kinder Krowns ® manufacturers and either autoclaved or cold sterilized. Gloss unit measurements were obtained with a small object Novo-Curve glossmeter. CIE-L*a*b* system values were measured with a CM-700d spectrophotometer under three different illuminants to calculate DE (quantitative representation of the perceived color). ΔE equals one was used for perceptibility threshold (PT) and ΔE equals 2.7 for acceptability threshold (AT). Results: All groups' baseline was ΔE less than one for all illuminants except Cheng Crowns to be autoclaved, indicating crowns are not identical in color from the manufacturer. For autoclaving, Cheng Crowns reached ΔE PT greater than one following the 10th sterilization cycle for all illuminants (D65 1.08±0.32 (standard deviation; P<0.001), A equals 1.07±0.32 (P<0.001), and F2 equals 1.25±0.38 (P<0.001). For cold sterilization, Sprig EZCrowns reached PT greater than one for all sterilization cycles, and Cheng Crowns reached ΔE PT greater than one for the sixth and 10th sterilization cycles. Gloss was not affected by either sterilization method. Spring EZcrowns had the highest mean translucency. Conclusions: Although each group may have a slight perceived difference, there was no clinically significant difference in color; all groups remained below the acceptability threshold of ΔE equals 2.7.
