Management dilemma in metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Papillary thyroid cancer is the most common type of well-differentiated thyroid cancer. It is associated with a survival rate greater than 95% with appropriate treatment, particularly in younger patients. We present the unique case of a 25-year-old male with severe Autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) with a right level V neck mass of several months. Due to his severe ASD, his first assessment was conducted in the hospital foyer, and every subsequent clinical assessment and blood test required a general anaesthetic (GA). He was subsequently diagnosed with T2 N1b M0 (Stage I) papillary thyroid cancer. He required extensive multidisciplinary team (MDT) input to determine the goal for his treatment whilst taking into consideration perioperative care, wound management, compliance with exam and blood tests, radioactive iodine administration and lifelong medication requirements if total thyroidectomy was considered. Following multiple MDT and family meetings, the decision was made to proceed with right hemi-thyroidectomy, right level I-V and central neck dissection. He required one-week stay in the intensive care unit under sedation post-operatively, and was discharged from hospital a further six days later with no complications. He is currently being followed-up every six months which presents its own challenges. This case highlights the extraordinary challenges and considerations that need to be made when dealing with surgical pathology in a patient with severe intellectual disability, even in the setting of a relatively common surgical pathology.

Evaluation of readability and reliability of online patient information for intracranial aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial aneurysms are common. Receiving this diagnosis can have a profound impact on patients and their families and this is compounded by the nuanced complexities around their management. An overwhelming majority of patients research health information using the internet. Patient-centred care and informed consent requires patients to have access to information that is readable and reliable. The aim of this study was to assess the readability and reliability of online health information about intracranial aneurysms. METHOD: A Google search was conducted using the terms 'brain aneurysm', 'cerebral aneurysm', and 'intracranial aneurysm' and the first 75 websites were screened for assessment. The readability of each website was assessed using the Flesch reading ease score (FRE), the Flesch-Kincaid grade level (FKGL), the gunning fog index (GFI) and the simple measure of gobbledygook (SMOG) indices. Reliability was assessed using the DISCERN instrument and the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMA). RESULTS: Following exclusion, 36 websites were analyzed. The websites collectively scored as 'difficult' readability and 'poor' reliability on average. Statistically significant differences in readability were observed between websites categorized as patient health information and commercial compared with academic and physician. Differences in readability were also observed between search results of 'brain aneurysm' compared with 'intracranial aneurysm'. CONCLUSION: The readability and reliability of online health information about intracranial aneurysms is suboptimal. Health professionals must ensure their patients are well informed which includes directing them to high quality resources which are readable and reliable and use layperson-oriented language during the consultation.