RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1333183.].
RESUMEN
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulatory therapy that has been FDA approved for the treatment of various disorders, including but not limited to, movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease and essential tremor), epilepsy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Computational methods for estimating the volume of tissue activated (VTA), coupled with brain imaging techniques, form the basis of models that are being generated from retrospective clinical studies for predicting DBS patient outcomes. For instance, VTA models are used to generate target-and network-based probabilistic stimulation maps that play a crucial role in predicting DBS treatment outcomes. This review defines the methods for calculation of tissue activation (or modulation) including ones that use heuristic and clinically derived estimates and more computationally involved ones that rely on finite-element methods and biophysical axon models. We define model parameters and provide a comparison of commercial, open-source, and academic simulation platforms available for integrated neuroimaging and neural activation prediction. In addition, we review clinical studies that use these modeling methods as a function of disease. By describing the tissue-activation modeling methods and highlighting their application in clinical studies, we provide the neural engineering and clinical neuromodulation communities with perspectives that may influence the adoption of modeling methods for future DBS studies.
RESUMEN
Filgrastim is a granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) used for multiple indications in cancer patients. We present a case of a 65-year-old man with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who was undergoing mobilization of hemopoietic stem cells for autologous-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) with filgrastim who developed dyspnea and non-productive cough. Chest imaging showed left lower lobe consolidation, new ground-glass opacities and small right-sided pleural effusion. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and infectious evaluation were completely negative. He was admitted for further evaluation and management. Antibiotics weren't started immediately given the clinical stability, multiple probable causes of fever and the intent of not confounding future thoracentesis results with antibiotic use. Thoracentesis occurred draining serous exudative pleural fluid; with follow-up chest imaging demonstrating no re-accumulation. His symptoms resolved and he was discharged in stable condition. The symptoms were hypothesized to be the probable adverse effects of filgrastim. We suggest close monitoring of pulmonary toxicities while administering this drug to patients to minimize such complications.