The last days: The medical response of United States and allied military teams during the Afghanistan Exodus.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to describe the United States and allied military medical response during the withdrawal from Afghanistan. BACKGROUND: The military withdrawal from Afghanistan concluded with severe hostilities resulting in numerous civilian and military casualties. The clinical care provided by coalition forces capitalized on decades of lessons learned and enabled unprecedented accomplishments. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational analysis, casualty numbers, and operative information was collected and reported from military medical assets in Kabul, Afghanistan. The continuum of medical care and the trauma system, from the point of injury back to the United States was captured and described. RESULTS: Prior to a large suicide bombing resulting in a mass casualty event, the international medical teams managed distinct 45 trauma incidents involving nearly 200 combat and non-combat civilian and military patients over the preceding 3 months. Military medical personnel treated 63 casualties from the Kabul airport suicide attack and performed 15 trauma operations. US air transport teams evacuated 37 patients within 15 hours of the attack. CONCLUSION: Lessons learned from the last 20 years of combat casualty care were successfully implemented during the culmination of the Afghanistan conflict. Ultimately, the effort, teamwork, and system adaptability exemplify not only the attitudes and character of service members who provide modern combat casualty care but also the paramount importance of the battlefield learning health care system. A continued posture to maintain military surgical preparedness in unique environments remain crucial as the US military prepares for the future.Retrospective observational analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Preliminary Experience With the Human Acellular Vessel: A Descriptive Case Series Detailing Early Use of a Bioengineered Blood Vessel for Arterial Repair.

BACKGROUND: An infection-resistant, immediately available conduit for trauma and urgent vascular reconstruction remains a critical need for successful limb salvage. While autologous vein remains the gold standard, vein-limited patients and size mismatch are common issues. The Human Acellular Vessel (HAV) (Humacyte, Inc., Durham, NC) is a bioengineered conduit with off-the-shelf availability and resistance to infection, ideal characteristics for patients with challenging revascularization scenarios. This report describes HAV implantation in patients with complex limb-threatening ischemia and limited conduit options who may have otherwise faced limb loss. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded-access program was used to allow urgent implantation of the HAV for arterial reconstruction. Electronic medical records were reviewed with extraction of relevant data including patient demographics, surgical implantation, patency, infectious complications, and mortality. RESULTS: The HAV was implanted in 8 patients requiring vascular reconstruction. Graft or soft tissue infection was present in 2 patients. One patient with severe penetrating pelvic injury had 4 HAV placed to repair bilateral external iliac artery and vein injuries. There was 1 technical failure due to poor outflow, 2 patients died unrelated to HAV use, and 5 lower extremity bypasses maintained patency at an average of 11.4 months (range: 4-20 months). No HAV infectious complications were identified. CONCLUSIONS: This report is the first United States series describing early outcomes using the HAV under the FDA expanded-access program for urgent vascular reconstruction. The HAV demonstrates resistance to infection, reliable patency, and offers surgeons an immediate option when confronted with complex revascularization scenarios. Assessment of long-term outcomes will be important for future studies.

Dunning-Kruger Effect Between Self-Peer Ratings of Surgical Performance During a MASCAL Event and Pre-Event Assessed Trauma Procedural Capabilities.

Objectives: The research question asked to what extent do self-rated performance scores of individual surgeons correspond to assessed procedural performance abilities and to peer ratings of procedural performance during a mass casualty (MASCAL) event? Background: Self-assessment using performance rating scales is ubiquitous in surgical education as a proxy for direct measurement of competence. The validity and reliability of self-ratings as competency measures are susceptible to cognitive biases such as Dunning-Kruger effects, which describe how individuals over/underestimate their own performance compared to assessments from independent sources. The ability of surgeons to accurately self-assess their procedural performance remains undetermined. Methods: A purposive sample of military surgeons (N = 13) who collectively cared for trauma patients during a MASCAL event participated in the study. Pre-event performance assessment scores for 32 trauma procedures were compared with post-event self and peer performance ratings using F tests (P < 0.05) and effect sizes (Cohen's d). Results: There were no significant differences between peer ratings and performance assessment scores. There were significant differences between self-ratings and both peer ratings (P < 0.001) and performance assessment scores (P < 0.001). Effect sizes were very large for self to peer rating comparison (Cohen's d = 2.34) and self to performance assessment comparison (Cohen's d = 2.77). Conclusions: The outcomes demonstrate that self-ratings were significantly lower than the independently determined assessment scores for each surgeon, revealing a Dunning-Kruger effect for highly skilled individuals underestimating their abilities. These outcomes underscore the limitations of self-assessment for measuring competence.

Management and outcomes of wartime cervical carotid artery injury.

BACKGROUND: Cervical carotid artery injuries entail high morbidity and mortality and are technically challenging to repair. This retrospective study describes the management and outcomes of cervical carotid injuries sustained during the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry was queried to identify US military personnel who sustained battle-related cervical carotid injury between January 2002 and December 2015. Retrospective chart reviews of the military Electronic Health Record were performed on patients identified. Demographics, injury characteristics, surgical management, and outcomes were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed to identify associations between injury and management factors, as well as stroke and mortality. RESULTS: In total, 67 patients (100% male; age, 25 ± 7 years) were identified with cervical carotid artery injuries. Fifty-six patients (84%) sustained a common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA) injury, and 11 patients (16%) had an isolated external carotid artery (ECA) injury. The anatomic distribution of injury was as follows: CCA, 26 (38.8%); ICA, 24 (35.8%); CCA and ICA 2 (3%); ICA and ECA 3 (4.5%); and CCA, ICA, and ECA 1 (1.5%). Of the 56 CCA or ICA injuries, 39 underwent vascular repair, 9 (16%) were managed with ligation, 1 was treated with a temporary vascular shunt but succumbed to injuries before vascular repair, and 7 (13%) were treated nonoperatively. Seven (23%) of 30 ICA injuries were ligated compared with 2 (7.7%) of 26 injuries isolated to the CCA (p = 0.02). Compared with repair, ligation of the CCA/ICA was associated with a higher rate of stroke (89% vs. 33%, p = 0.003) and increased mortality without statistical significance (22% vs. 10%, p = 0.3). Every patient who underwent ICA ligation had a stroke (7/7). There was no difference in Injury Severity Score between the ligation and repair groups (23.8 ± 10.6 vs. 24.7 ± 13.4, p = 0.9). At a mean follow-up of 34.5 months, 10 of 17 stroke survivors had permanent neurologic deficits. CONCLUSION: In modern combat, penetrating injuries involving the cervical carotid arteries are relatively infrequent. In this experience, isolated ICA injuries were three times more likely to be ligated than those involving the CCA. As a surgical maneuver, ICA ligation resulted in stroke in all cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort analysis, level III.

Epidemiology of Upper Extremity Vascular Injury in Contemporary Combat.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of wartime upper-extremity vascular injury (UEVI) has been stable for the past century. The objective of this study is to provide a contemporary review of wartime UEVI, including epidemiologic characterization and description of early limb loss. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) was queried to identify US service members who sustained a battle-related UEVI in Afghanistan between January 2009 and December 2015. Anatomic distribution of injury, mechanism of injury (MOI), associated injuries, early management, and early limb loss were analyzed. RESULTS: Analysis identified 247 casualties who sustained 308 UEVIs. The most common injury was to the vessels distal to the brachial bifurcation (63.3%, n = 195), followed by the brachial vessels (27.3%, n = 84) and the axillary vessels (9.4%, n = 29). The predominant MOIs were penetrating explosive fragments (74.1%, n = 183) and gunshot wounds (25.9%, n = 64). Associated fractures were identified in 151 (61.1%) casualties and nerve injuries in 133 (53.8%). Angiography was performed in 91 (36.8%) casualties, and endovascular treatment was performed 10 (4%) times. Temporary vascular shunts were placed in 39 (15.8%) casualties. Data on surgical management were available for 171 injuries and included repair (48%, n = 82) and ligation (52%, n = 89). The early limb loss rate was 12.1% (n = 30). For all casualties sustaining early limb loss, the MOI was penetrating fragments from an explosion; the average injury severity score (ISS) was 32.3, and the mortality was 6.7% (n = 2). In those without amputation, the ISS and mortality were low at 20 and 4.6% (n = 10), respectively. Overall mortality was 4.9% (n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: The early limb loss rate was increased compared with initial descriptions from Operation Iraqi Freedom. Amputations are associated with a higher ISS. Improved data capture and fidelity, or differing MOIs, may account for this trend. Proficiency with open and endovascular therapy remains a critical focus for combat casualty care.

Infraclavicular Thoracic Outlet Decompression Compared to Supraclavicular Thoracic Outlet Decompression for the Management of Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS) requires surgical decompression often combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis and venoplasty. Surgical options include transaxillary, supraclavicular, or infraclavicular approaches to first rib resection. The optimal method, however, has yet to be defined. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent infraclavicular versus supraclavicular surgical decompression for VTOS. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical management for VTOS from December 2010 to November 2017 was performed. During the study period, supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches were chosen according to surgeon preference. Patient demographics, pre- and postdecompression interventions, perioperative outcomes for each group of patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent surgical management of VTOS, of which 15 (50%) underwent infraclavicular decompression and 15 (50%) supraclavicular decompression. The mean age of patients was 32.1 ± 13.6 years and 80% were male. Twenty-six patients (86.7%) presented with thrombotic VTOS. Acute axillosubclavian vein thrombosis was present in 20 (76.9%) of these patients, 10 patients in each group. Subacute or chronic thrombosis was encountered in the remaining 6 (23%) patients, 2 patients in the infraclavicular group and 4 patients in the supraclavicular group. Preoperative thrombolysis was utilized in 7 (46.7%) and 6 (40%) patients in the infraclavicular and supraclavicular groups, respectively (P = 1.00). Patients without postdecompression venography were removed from analysis and included 1 patient in the infraclavicular group and 5 patients in the supraclavicular group. Initial postdecompression venogram, prior to any endovascular intervention, demonstrated a residual axillosubclavian vein stenosis of greater than 50% in 6 (42.9%) patients in the infraclavicular decompression group and 7 (70%) patients in the supraclavicular decompression group (P = 0.24). Crossing the stenosis after surgical decompression was more easily accomplished in the infraclavicular group, 14 (100%) versus 5 (50%), (P = 0.01). Following endovascular venoplasty, calculated residual stenosis greater than 50% was found in 0 (0%) and 3 (30%) patients in the infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches, respectively (P = 0.047). Infraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression was associated with fewer patients with postoperative symptoms, 0 of 15 (0%) versus 8 of 15 (53.3%), (P = 0.0022), and infraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression demonstrated improved patency, 15 of 15 (100%) versus 8 of 15 (53.3%), (P = 0.028) at a mean combined follow-up of 8.47 ± 10.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Infraclavicular thoracic outlet decompression for the surgical management of VTOS was associated with fewer postoperative symptoms and improved axillosubclavian vein patency compared to the supraclavicular approach. Prospective analysis is warranted to determine long-term outcomes following infraclavicular decompression.

A contemporary, 7-year analysis of vascular injury from the war in Afghanistan.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular injury is a leading cause of death and disability in military and civilian trauma. Although a previous interim study defined the distribution of vascular injury during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a contemporary epidemiologic assessment has not been performed. The objective of this study was to provide a current analysis of vascular injury during the final 7 years of the war in Afghanistan, including characterization of anatomic injury patterns, mechanisms of injury, and methods of acute management. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry was analyzed to identify U.S. military service members who sustained a battle-related vascular injury and survived to be treated at a surgical facility in Afghanistan between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015. All battle-related injuries (nonreturn to duty) were used as a denominator to establish the injury rate. Mechanism and anatomic distribution of injury as well as the acute management strategies of revascularization, ligation, and use of endovascular techniques were defined. RESULTS: Of 3900 service members who sustained a battle-related injury, 685 patients (17.6%) had 1105 vascular injuries (1.6 vascular injuries per patient). Extremity trauma accounted for 72% (n = 796) of vascular injuries, followed by the torso (17%; n = 188) and cervical (11%; n = 118) regions. Lower extremity vascular injury was the most prevalent anatomic location (45%; 501/1105). Explosion with fragment penetration accounted for 70% (477/685) of injuries, whereas gunshot wounds accounted for 30% (205/685). Open repair was performed in 559 cases (57%; 554/981), whereas ligation was the initial management strategy in 40% (395/981) of cases. In addition, 374 diagnostic endovascular procedures were completed, 27 therapeutic endovascular interventions to include stent placement and angioplasty were performed and 55 inferior vena cava filters were placed. Mortality of the vascular injury cohort was 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of vascular injury in modern combat is higher than that reported in previous wars. Open reconstruction is performed in half of cases, although ligation is an important damage control option, especially for minor or distal vessel injuries. Angiographic techniques are increasingly being used and documented within wartime registries more than ever. Proficiency with open and endovascular methods of vascular injury management remains a critical need for the U.S. military and will require partnership with civilian institutions to attain and maintain.