Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Manag Care ; 30(5): e147-e156, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748915

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is linked to a 61% increased risk of emergency department (ED) visits and frequent ED usage. Collaborative care management (CoCM) models target MDD treatment in primary care, but how best to prioritize patients for CoCM to prevent frequent ED utilization remains unclear. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk identification model to proactively detect patients with MDD in CoCM at high risk of frequent (≥ 3) ED visits. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic health records from Mayo Clinic's primary care system to develop and validate a machine learning-based risk identification model. The model predicts the likelihood of frequent ED visits among patients with MDD within a 12-month period. METHODS: Data were collected from Mayo Clinic's primary care system between May 1, 2006, and December 19, 2018. Risk identification models were developed and validated using machine learning classifiers to estimate frequent ED visit risks over 12 months. The Shapley Additive Explanations model identified variables driving frequent ED visits. RESULTS: The patient population had a mean (SD) age of 39.78 (16.66) years, with 30.3% being male and 6.1% experiencing frequent ED visits. The best-performing algorithm (elastic-net logistic regression) achieved an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.84), a sensitivity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), and a specificity of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) in the development data set. In the validation data set, the best-performing algorithm (random forest) achieved an area under the curve of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.83, and a specificity of 0.61. Significant variables included male gender, prior frequent ED visits, high Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score, low education level, unemployment, and use of multiple medications. CONCLUSIONS: The risk identification model has potential for clinical application in triaging primary care patients with MDD in CoCM, aiming to reduce future ED utilization.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Aprendizaje Automático , Humanos , Masculino , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Medición de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud
2.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 205: 110989, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37918637

RESUMEN

AIMS: To identify longitudinal trajectories of glycemic control among adults with newly diagnosed diabetes, overall and by diabetes type. METHODS: We analyzed claims data from OptumLabs® Data Warehouse for 119,952 adults newly diagnosed diabetes between 2005 and 2018. We applied a novel Mixed Effects Machine Learning model to identify longitudinal trajectories of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) over 3 years of follow-up and used multinomial regression to characterize factors associated with each trajectory. RESULTS: The study population was comprised of 119,952 adults with newly diagnosed diabetes, including 696 (0.58%) with type 1 diabetes. Among patients with type 1 diabetes, 52.6% were diagnosed at very high HbA1c, partially improved, but never achieved control; 32.5% were diagnosed at low HbA1c and deteriorated over time; and 14.9% had stable low HbA1c. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, 67.7% had stable low HbA1c, 14.4% were diagnosed at very high HbA1c, partially improved, but never achieved control; 10.0% were diagnosed at moderately high HbA1c and deteriorated over time; and 4.9% were diagnosed at moderately high HbA1c and improved over time. CONCLUSIONS: Claims data identified distinct longitudinal trajectories of HbA1c after diabetes diagnosis, which can be used to anticipate challenges and individualize care plans to improve glycemic control.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucemia , Control Glucémico , Hemoglobina Glucada
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...