Intratarsal keratinous cysts of the meibomian gland (a sebaceous duct cyst): report of 2 cases.

Intratarsal keratinous cyst of the meibomian gland is a recently described entity that recurs if not completely excised. Herein, we report 2 cases and discuss their diagnosis and management: (1) A 57-year-old man with a recurrent mass of the upper eyelid treated with incision and drainage as a chalazion for more than 5 years and (2) An 85-year-old man presented with a slow growing nodule of the upper eyelid. Exploration via the eyelid crease approach revealed cysts fixed to the tarsus that were completely excised with a portion of the anterior tarsus. Histologically, these cysts exhibited a keratinizing squamous epithelium without a granular layer (trichilemmal keratinization), were lined by an eosinophilic undulating cuticle, contain string-like keratin debris, and had a fibrous wall without sebaceous lobules. All epithelial components strongly expressed high-molecular weight keratins, whereas the lining, cuticle, and keratin contents strongly expressed carcinoembryonic antigen. No recurrence has occurred 7 and 12 months postoperatively. The location and clinicopathologic findings of intratarsal keratinous cysts distinguish it from sebaceous tumors, steatocystoma simplex, epidermoid cyst, and dermoid cyst. However, like steatocystomas, intratarsal keratinous cysts exhibit a sebaceous duct phenotype. The anterior lid crease approach with partial tarsectomy seems to be an effective treatment.

Eye pain in preschool children: diagnostic and prognostic significance.

BACKGROUND: Preschool children often present for ophthalmologic examination because of eye pain. Although the differential diagnosis includes serious conditions, the diagnostic and prognostic importance of apparently isolated eye pain are unknown. METHODS: We reviewed records of 80 consecutive patients presenting between 2 and 6 years of age with eye pain but without a red eye or a history of an obvious cause of pain. Families of children seen in the office only once were contacted by phone to obtain follow-up information. RESULTS: Functional eye pain was diagnosed in 73 of 80 patients (91%). Of the 64 patients with follow-up between 1 week to 4 years (mean, 21 months), 56 (88%) had no other cause of eye pain. Dry eyes, allergic conjunctivitis, blepharitis, corneal foreign body, sinusitis, and trichiasis were diagnosed in 7 patients. Other children were found to have refractive error, amblyopia, blepharospasm, and nystagmus--all considered unlikely to cause eye pain. CONCLUSIONS: Absent a preexisting or obvious cause of eye pain, the symptom is usually functional in preschool children who may have difficulty communicating vague visual symptoms to caregivers. However, such children deserve examination, not only so that unapparent causes can be excluded but also because unrelated conditions may require further evaluation and treatment. Parents can be reassured that if no abnormality is found on initial ophthalmologic examination, children with eye pain are unlikely to have subsequent diagnoses.

Anisometropic amblyopia: axial length versus corneal curvature in children with severe refractive imbalance.

PURPOSE: To define the ocular parameters associated with anisometropic ambylopia in children with severe hyperopia, myopia, or astigmatism in 1 eye. METHODS: Anisometropic and fellow eyes of 13 children, ages 7-8, with anisometropia >3.0 D and amblyopia without strabismus or other visually significant ocular pathology were studied. Axial length, corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth, and corneal diameter measurements of amblyopic and fellow eyes were obtained using the IOL Master (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). RESULTS: Comparing amblyopic eyes with unaffected fellow eyes as reference, patients with anisohyperopia had shorter axial lengths by an average of 1.49 mm (p = 0.001), and patients with anisomyopia had longer axial lengths by an average of 2.26 mm. Corneal astigmatism was the source of amblyogenic refractive error in 1 child. CONCLUSIONS: In children with anisometropic amblyopia, interocular differences in spherical refractive error was attributed to axial length with no differences in corneal curvature, whereas the anisoastigmatism observed in 1 case was attributed to asymmetric corneal curvature.