RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The study aims to examine the disparities in mortality rates attributed to brain cancer between urban and rural areas over a 22-year period, totaling 315,538 deaths. This investigation serves as a crucial step in identifying areas within healthcare that require improvement. By pinpointing the variations in mortality rates between urban and rural settings, healthcare authorities can strategically implement necessary interventions. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study was conducted by analyzing the death certificate available on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database from 1999 to 2020 to evaluate the mortality rate trends of brain cancer ( International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 C71.0-71.9).The data was grouped based on rural and urban death rates according to the 2013 urbanization classification and the variables that were used were age, gender and race. Data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel and R Studio 4.3.1. Significant associations between demographic variables and mortality rates were identified via Binomial tests. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2020, urban areas recorded 259,402 deaths attributed to brain cancer, compared to 56,136 deaths in rural areas, indicating a higher mortality rate in urban settings. The mortality rate in both rural and urban areas exhibited an upward trend, except for a slight drop in 2010. The mortality rates were significantly higher in rural areas compared to urban areas for age groups 55-64 years and 65-74 years, males and caucasians. CONCLUSIONS: Our research underscores the differences in death rates from brain cancer between urban and rural areas, specifically among individuals aged 55-64 and 65-74, males and those of caucasian ethnicity. Future research must adopt a multifaceted approach, integrating more recent datasets and embracing a finer granularity of individual-level information. Moreover, there is a pressing need to explore the interplay of various factors such as access to healthcare, treatment modalities, genetic predispositions, and socioeconomic determinants on mortality outcomes.
RESUMEN
Modern agriculture is primarily focused on the massive production of cereals and other food-based crops in a sustainable manner in order to fulfill the food demands of an ever-increasing global population. However, intensive agricultural practices, rampant use of agrochemicals, and other environmental factors result in soil fertility degradation, environmental pollution, disruption of soil biodiversity, pest resistance, and a decline in crop yields. Thus, experts are shifting their focus to other eco-friendly and safer methods of fertilization in order to ensure agricultural sustainability. Indeed, the importance of plant growth-promoting microorganisms, also determined as "plant probiotics (PPs)," has gained widespread recognition, and their usage as biofertilizers is being actively promoted as a means of mitigating the harmful effects of agrochemicals. As bio-elicitors, PPs promote plant growth and colonize soil or plant tissues when administered in soil, seeds, or plant surface and are used as an alternative means to avoid heavy use of agrochemicals. In the past few years, the use of nanotechnology has also brought a revolution in agriculture due to the application of various nanomaterials (NMs) or nano-based fertilizers to increase crop productivity. Given the beneficial properties of PPs and NMs, these two can be used in tandem to maximize benefits. However, the use of combinations of NMs and PPs, or their synergistic use, is in its infancy but has exhibited better crop-modulating effects in terms of improvement in crop productivity, mitigation of environmental stress (drought, salinity, etc.), restoration of soil fertility, and strengthening of the bioeconomy. In addition, a proper assessment of nanomaterials is necessary before their application, and a safer dose of NMs should be applicable without showing any toxic impact on the environment and soil microbial communities. The combo of NMs and PPs can also be encapsulated within a suitable carrier, and this method aids in the controlled and targeted delivery of entrapped components and also increases the shelf life of PPs. However, this review highlights the functional annotation of the combined impact of NMs and PPs on sustainable agricultural production in an eco-friendly manner.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Brass is a copper-zinc alloy that also contains additional elements, including lead. Industrial operations on brass produce dust and fumes that can be harmful to an individual's health. Ayurveda recommends Dadima Svarasa and Triphala Churna for the management of symptoms caused due to brass toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To obtain preliminary evidence on the efficacy of Triphala Churna (powder mixture of three myrobalans) and Dadima Svarasa (pomegranate juice) in the management of brass-associated high serum level of copper, zinc, lead, and their harms through an open-label single-arm pilot study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 workers with brass toxicity and increased level of one or more of the serum ions including copper, zinc and lead were prescribed. 5gm Triphala powder once daily and Dadima Svarasa 40 ml in two divided doses were administered daily for 28 days. Changes in serum concentration of heavy metals and common health problems like anorexia, headache, dizziness, weakness, nausea, nose irritation, eye irritation, epigastric pain, abdominal distention, chest pain, dyspnea, cough, lumbar pain, body ache, numbness, and occupational dermatitis were reported at baseline and end of the trial. RESULTS: Trial drugs were found to produce significant decrease in mean values of serum copper (p < 0.001) and serum lead (p < 0.001) whereas significant increase in mean values of serum zinc (p > 0.001) was observed. Significant relief was observed in nausea (p = 0.005), anorexia (p = 0.000), epigastric pain (p = 0.001), abdominal distention (p = 0.014), weakness (p = 0.005) and body ache (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Triphala Churna along with Dadima Svarasa are safe and effective in the management of brass-associated high serum levels of copper and lead and their health hazards.
