Calcium-stimulated calcitonin test for the diagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer: results of a multicenter study and comparison between different assays.

BACKGROUND: A basal serum calcitonin (Ct) increase >100 pg/mL in patients with a thyroid nodule is consistent with the diagnosis of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). In cases where the CT test have a slight to moderate increase, the calcium gluconate stimulation test is helpful to increase diagnostic accuracy. However, reliable cut-offs for calcium-stimulated Ct are still lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sex-specific calcium-stimulated Ct cutoffs for the diagnosis of MTC in a multicenter series. A comparison between different Ct assays has been also performed. METHODS: 90 subjects undergone calcium-stimulated Ct for a suspected MTC in 5 Endocrine Units between 2010-2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Serum Ct concentrations were assessed by immunoradiometric (IRMA) or chemiluminescence (CLIA) assays. RESULTS: MTC was diagnosed in 37 (41.1%) and excluded in 53 (58.9%) patients. The best calcium-stimulated Ct cut-off to identify MTC was 611 pg/mL in males (AUC =0.90, 95% CI (0.76;1) and 445 pg/mL in females (AUC=0.79, 95% CI (0.66;0.91). Logistic regression analysis showed that both basal (OR 1.01, P=0.003) and peak Ct after stimulation (OR 1.07, P=0.007) were significantly associated with MTC, together with sex (OR=0.06, P<0.001). The "Ct assay" variable was also considered in the logistic regression model, but it was not significantly associated with MTC (OR=0.93, P=0.919). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that calcium test could be helpful to identify patients with early-stage MTC and those without MTC. A Ct value of 611 pg/mL in males and 445 pg/mL in females are proposed as the optimal Ct cut-offs at the stimulation test.

One-year follow-up comparison of two hybrid closed-loop systems in Italian children and adults with type 1 diabetes.

Background and aims: Tandem Control-IQ and MiniMed 780G are the main Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (AHCL) systems currently available in pediatric and adult patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). The aim of our study was to evaluate glycemic control after 1-year of follow-up extending our previous study of 1-month comparison between the two systems. Methods: We retrospectively compared clinical and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from the patients included in the previous study which have completed 1-year observation period. The study population consisted of 74 patients, 42 Minimed 780G users and 32 Tandem Control-IQ users. Linear mixed models with random intercept were performed to study the variations over time and the interaction between time and system; Mann-Whitney or T-test were used to compare systems at 1-year. Results: Both systems have been shown to be effective in maintaining the glycemic improvement achieved one month after starting AHCL. Significant changes over time were observed for TIR, TAR, TAR>250mg/dl, average glucose levels and SD (p<0.001). At 1-year follow-up Minimed 780G obtained better improvement in TIR (p<0.001), TAR (p=0.002), TAR>250mg/dl (p=0.001), average glucose levels (p<0.001). The comparison of the glycemic parameters at 1-year showed a significant superiority of Minimed 780G in terms of TIR (71% vs 68%; p=0.001), TAR (p=0.001), TAR>250 (p=0.009), average glucose levels(p=0.001) and SD (p=0.031). Conclusions: The use of AHCL systems led to a significant improvement of glycemic control at 1-month, which is maintained at 1-year follow-up. MiniMed is more effective than Tandem in reaching the International recommended glycemic targets. Continuous training and education in the use of technology is essential to get the best out of the most advanced technological tools.

"Present and future of immunotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors".

Immunotherapy, so promising in many neoplasms, still does not have a precise role in the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). In this article, we provide an overview on the current knowledge about immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) applied to NENs, evaluating future perspectives in this setting of tumors.Evidence so far available for ICIs in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NENs is definitively not as robust as for other tumors such as Small Cell Lung Cancer or Merkel Cell Carcinoma. In fact, with regard to the well-differentiated forms of NENs (NETs), the results obtained nowadays have been disappointing. However, the near future, might reserve interesting results for ICIs in GEP-NEN from a total of nine different ICI drugs, used throughout 19 randomised controlled trials. Such numbers highlight the growing attention gathering around NENs and ICIs, in response to the need of stronger evidences supporting such therapy.For the future, the most important aspect will be to study strategies that can make NETs more susceptible to response to ICI and, thus, enhance the effectiveness of these treatments. Therefore, the combination of conventional therapy, target therapy and immunotherapy deserve attention and warrant to be explored. A sequential chemotherapy, possibly inducing an increase in tumor mutational burden and tested before immunotherapy, could be a hypothesis deserving more consideration. A radiation treatment that increases tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, could be another approach to explore before ICIs in NENs. Equally essential will be the identification of biomarkers useful for selecting patients potentially responsive to this type of treatment.