Latent class analysis of emotions experienced during compulsive hair-pulling episodes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Reasons for compulsive hair pulling are heterogeneous and not fully understood. Given that many people who experience compulsive hair pulling do not respond to treatment, identifying subgroups can inform potential mechanisms and treatment design. METHODS: We sought to identify empirical subgroups among participants in an online treatment program for trichotillomania (N = 1728). A latent class analysis was used to identify patterns of emotions associated with compulsive hair-pulling episodes. RESULTS: Six classes of participants were found which reflected three predominant themes. One theme reflected expected patterns, where emotional changes were seen following pulling. Two other themes were more surprising, where one reflected high overall emotional activation that did not show consistent change in response to pulling, and another showed low emotional activation overall. These results suggest that there are multiple types of hair-pulling and a sizeable group of people may benefit from treatment adjustments. LIMITATIONS: Participants did not receive semi-structured diagnostic assessment. A majority of participants were Caucasian, and future research would benefit from increased participant diversity. Emotions associated with compulsive hair-pulling were measured across an entire treatment program, but the relationship between specific intervention components and change in specific emotions was not systematically collected. CONCLUSIONS: While previous research has addressed overall phenomenology and comorbidity, the present study is the first to identify empirical subgroups of people who experience compulsive hair-pulling at the level of individual pulling episodes. Identified participant classes had distinguishing features that can aid in personalizing treatment to individual symptom presentations.

Intervention cost-effectiveness for pediatric anxiety and OCD: A systematic review and integrated database model.

BACKGROUND: While multiple treatments for pediatric anxiety and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) are efficacious, little is known about their cost-effectiveness. In response, we sought to provide relevant information through systematic review and cost-effectiveness simulation. METHODS: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of treatment for pediatric anxiety and OCD in two ways. First, we conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Second, we evaluated cost-effectiveness for antidepressant medication, cognitive behavioral therapy, and their combination via a simulation that integrated information from the Truven MarketScan database and the NIMH National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Illness. RESULTS: Both systematic review and simulation found antidepressant medication and cognitive behavioral therapy to be cost-effective for pediatric anxiety and OCD. Antidepressant medication was the least costly approach, and cognitive behavioral therapy provided additional cost-effectiveness, especially for OCD. LIMITATIONS: During systematic review, relatively few articles provided information about both costs and effectiveness. While there was a notable margin of error to support multiple interventions as cost-effective, limited prior research decreased precision of point estimates and comparisons between interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Both antidepressant medication and cognitive behavioral therapy were found to be cost-effective for pediatric anxiety and OCD. Results supported investment from third party payers, who serve as critical gatekeepers that can increase treatment dissemination. However, more precise information would better inform the exact amount of investment needed, especially with regard to selection decisions between active interventions. Cost-effectiveness research would benefit from systematic collection of data on treatment costs and quality of life in future clinical trials.

Symptom Trajectories of Early Responders and Remitters among Youth with OCD.

Objectives: This study examined the phenomenology and predictors of early response and remission among youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Methods: One hundred and thirty-nine youth with a current primary diagnosis of OCD participated in this study. Participants received 10 sessions of CBT augmented by either placebo or d-cycloserine (DCS) as part of a randomized double-blind multi-site clinical trial. Early response and remission status were determined by clinician-rated global symptom improvement (CGI-I) and severity (CGI-S), respectively. Results: At the mid-treatment assessment, 45.3% of youth were early responders, and 28.1% were early remitters. At post-treatment assessment, 79.1% of youth were responders and 67.6% were remitters. Early response predicted a higher likelihood of post-treatment response and remission; early remission significantly predicted a higher likelihood of post-treatment remission. Bivariate logistic regressions showed that early response was predicted by lower baseline clinician-rated global severity (CGI-S) and lower depression severity; however, only depression severity remained a significant predictor in the multivariable logistic regression model. Furthermore, bivariate logistic regressions showed that early remission was predicted by lower baseline clinician-rated global severity (CGI-S), lower depression severity, and lower obsessive-compulsive symptom severity (CY-BOCS); however, only global severity remained a significant predictor in the multivariable logistic regression model. Conclusions: Lower OCD and depression symptom severity predicted a greater likelihood of early treatment response and remission to CBT. Findings suggest that low OCD and depression symptom severity could serve as baseline characteristics to identify potential candidates for lower-intensity initial interventions in a stepped care approach. The modest predictive value of the variables examined suggests that additional factors could add to prediction of treatment response and remission.

Health beliefs, behaviors, and symptoms associated with orthorexia nervosa.

PURPOSE: This research explored whether symptoms of orthorexia nervosa (ON), a condition involving obsessive thoughts and compulsive behaviors regarding healthy eating, are associated with differences pertaining to use of nutritional supplements and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) techniques, to health locus of control, and to symptoms of poor physical health. METHOD: An anonymous online survey assessing the variables above was completed by college students at a university in the southern United States: 47 in the ON symptoms group, 50 in the healthy-eating control group, and 83 in the normal-eating control group. RESULTS: Compared to both control groups, the ON symptoms group reported greater supplement use and CAM participation, more reasons for these behaviors for the purpose of improving psychological health (i.e., to increase energy, enhance focus, and improve mood), and greater symptoms associated with poor physical health. None of the groups differed on internal or external health locus of control. CONCLUSION: For those with ON, "healthy" eating behaviors are accompanied by other health behaviors that include supplement use and CAM activities. However, despite their goal of achieving perfect health, these individuals experience diminished physical health with symptoms that may be related to their severe dietary restrictions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, descriptive cross-sectional study.