Preoperative screening for obstructive sleep apnea in cardiovascular patients - How useful is STOP-BANG questionnaire in the Indian context?

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is reported in a high proportion of cardiac surgical patients, up to 73%. STOP-BANG is a validated questionnaire for screening of outpatients for OSA with high sensitivity. There is sparse literature from India regarding the prevalence of OSA in preoperative cardiovascular patients and the utility of screening tools. Aims: We sought to study the utility of the STOP-BANG questionnaire as a screening tool for OSA in cardiovascular patients validating it with ambulatory level 3 polysomnography. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective study where consecutive patients getting admitted for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) from August 2017-February 2019 were recruited. All the patients were screened with the STOP-BANG questionnaire. 53 patients underwent overnight level 3 polysomnography using Apnea-Link. Correlations were made between clinical symptoms, STOP-BANG score, and OSA severity, measured using Apnea hypopnea index (AHI). Results: We had 120 patients(103 males) with a mean age 60 years. Snoring was the most common sleep complaint. Our cohort had a high prevalence of vascular risk factors (DM 72.3%, hypertension 59.2%, dyslipidemia 60%) and 11.7% were obese (BMI >30). The median STOP-BANG score was 3 (IQR 2) with 83 having scores ≥3. Median AHI was 5.6 with AHI ≥5 in 28 patients and AHI 15 or above in 14 patients. Among the clinical parameters, arousals with respiratory difficulty at night, higher neck circumference, and tonsillar hypertrophy showed a significant association with PSG-proven OSA.STOP-BANG scores 3 or above had a sensitivity of 75% in predicting OSA. Conclusions: Our study shows that in cardiovascular patients less symptomatic for sleep complaints, the STOP-BANG questionnaire is a useful screening tool for OSA in outpatient settings. Among clinical parameters, airway narrowing and neck circumference can predict OSA.

Dysphagia and disability in minor strokes - An institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Minor strokes, defined as NIHSS ≤5 are considered non-disabling, associated with a favourable outcome. AIM: Our aim was to study prevalence and predictors of dysphagia in patients with minor stroke and its impact on functional outcome. METHODS: Single centre retrospective study of all minor strokes admitted to Comprehensive Stroke care centre with 1 year completed follow-up were recruited. Clinical and imaging details and follow-up data were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: We had 147 patients with minor stroke, 72.1% men with median age 61 years. 71% presented within 24 h of symptom onset. Most common etiology was lacunar .Median NIHSS at admission was 3(IQR 2). 85 patients had anterior circulation strokes and 34 had chronic infarcts in imaging.19 had significant dysphagia and 10 were discharged with nasogastric feeding tube. Admission NIHSS and white mater changes in imaging were predictive of post stroke dysphagia. Excellent recovery of dysphagia was found within 1 month post stroke in all, except one who required percutaneous gastrostomy. At 3 months 76% had excellent outcome. Presence of dysphagia and diabetes were found to be predictive of short term outcome, independent of admission stroke severity. At 12 months, post stroke dysphagia, female gender and white mater changes in imaging were predictive of unfavourable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Minor strokes are disabling in a small fraction of patients. Over 10% of them can have significant post stroke dysphagia necessitating nasogastric feeding short term. This patient subgroup tend to have less favourable outcome on short and long term follow-up.