RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance and (2) evaluate if adding another CBCT acquisition and corrections prior to treatment improves the overall position accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intrafractional motion was retrospectively analyzed for 78 fractions in 54 patients. All patients were immobilized with an evacuated cushion. Before treatment, a CBCT was acquired, a bony fusion with the planning CT was performed and translational and rotational errors were corrected. For 30 of the patients (39 fractions) acquisition of another CBCT and corrections were performed before treatment. A post treatment CBCT was acquired for all patients, and translational and rotational errors measured by fusion of the post treatment CBCT with the planning CT were recorded to calculate means and standard deviations (SDs). RESULTS: The positional errors were significantly smaller in 4 out of 6 error values in the patient group treated with verification CBCT. In this group, translational and rotational SDs ranged from 0.5 to 0.6â¯mm and 0.3°, respectively. Corresponding values in the group treated without verification CBCT were 0.7-1.0â¯mm and 0.4-0.7°. CONCLUSION: With proper CBCT image guidance, patient immobilization and FFF-beam delivery, one can obtain very high patient position accuracy in spine SBRT. Inclusion of a verification CBCT prior to treatment increases the overall position accuracy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: HDR afterloading brachytherapy (HDRBT) for prostate cancer is now established as an effective technique to achieve dose escalation in the radical treatment of localized prostate cancer. The previous guidelines published in 2005 from GEC ESTRO and EAU have been updated to reflect the current and emerging roles for HDRBT in prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: The indications for HDRBT in dose escalation schedules with external beam are wide ranging with all patients having localized disease eligible for this technique. Exclusion criteria are few encompassing patients medically unfit for the procedure and those with significant urinary outflow symptoms. RESULTS: Recommendations for patient selection, treatment facility, implant technique, dose prescription and dosimetry reporting are given. CONCLUSIONS: HDRBT in prostate cancer can be practiced effectively and safely within the context of these guidelines with the main indication being for dose escalation with external beam. HDRBT used alone is currently under evaluation and its role in focal treatment and recurrence will be areas of future development.