[Partial exchange in total hip arthroplasty : What can we combine?] / Gelenkteilwechsel in der Hüftarthroplastik : Was dürfen wir kombinieren?

BACKGROUND: In case of hip revision arthroplasty, one component (cup/stem) is often well fixed and does not need to be exchanged. The newly implanted component needs to be compatible with the well-fixed implant. The combination of implants from different companies leads to "mix and match" or even mismatch between the implants. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The objective of this work was to describe possible combinations including their specifications that need to be considered in partial exchange of hip prostheses. For this purpose the literature, surgical techniques of companies and judgements concerning this topic were analysed and our own results and experiences were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Partial revision arthroplasty can be challenging and needs to be planned in detail. In case of isolated cup or inlay revision with exchange of a modular head the cone of the stem needs to be identified. A ceramic head may be used in revision with a titanium sleeve even from a different company as long as they are compatible. Patients however need to give their informed consent for this mix and match procedure. This procedure is done frequently and good study results support this, however from a juristic point of view a definite recommendation cannot be given. If the inlay of a cup is replaced, the original inlay should be used. If this is not available anymore, it can be manufactured as a special product in many cases. If this is also not possible, an inlay can also be cemented into a well-fixed cup. Biomechanical and clinical studies support this off-label technique. In case of an isolated exchange of the stem with a ceramic inlay that is retained in a well-fixed cup, the revision stem and ceramic head need to be from the same company as the cup. In case of ceramic fracture, a ceramic head with a titanium sleeve should be combined with a PE or ceramic inlay, a metal head or inlay should never be used.

[Does the certification according to EndoCert lead to a better quality of treatment?] / Bringt die Zertifizierung nach EndoCert eine messbare Verbesserung der Versorgungsqualität?

BACKGROUND: Certification according to EndoCert in the field of arthroplasty in Germany aims at standardization of treatment and with this optimization of its quality. However, huge capital investment and efforts are necessary. There are currently more than 400 certified centres in Germany. Our Department of Orthopaedics at a German medical school was certified in the pilot phase. The aim of this study was to analyse whether there was a difference in the quality in the year after the certification. A second aim was to analyse whether the defined quality criteria are adequate for a university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The quality criteria as defined by EndoCert were analysed in the year before (2011) and after certification (2012). The observed complications were noted for 1 year postoperatively. The clinical outcome was analysed with Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index Score (WOMAC) 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no difference concerning the criteria analysed, including the clinical outcome in the year before and that after certification. In both years, nearly all criteria could be reached except the operation time and the infection rate in hip and knee revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Certification did not lead to a measurable change of the quality of care. Nearly all criteria, except the infection rate in revision arthroplasty (required: less than 3% at 1 year postop.) and the operation duration could be fulfilled. This rate as well as the operation duration should be revised. Certification according to EndoCert is an important tool to prove quality care, however big efforts and capital are needed. The criteria should be constantly revised and reduced, as these resources should not be missed in patient care.

Histopathological Analysis of PEEK Wear Particle Effects on the Synovial Tissue of Patients.

Introduction. Increasing interest developed in the use of carbon-fiber-reinforced-poly-ether-ether-ketones (CFR-PEEK) as an alternative bearing material in knee arthroplasty. The effects of CFR-PEEK wear in in vitro and animal studies are controversially discussed, as there are no data available concerning human tissue. The aim of this study was to analyze human tissue containing CFR-PEEK as well as UHMWPE wear debris. The authors hypothesized no difference between the used biomaterials. Methods and Materials. In 10 patients during knee revision surgery of a rotating-hinge-knee-implant-design, synovial tissue samples were achieved (tibial inserts: UHMWPE; bushings and flanges: CFR-PEEK). One additional patient received revision surgery without any PEEK components as a control. The tissue was paraffin-embedded, sliced into 2 µm thick sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin in a standard process. A modified panoptical staining was also done. Results. A "wear-type" reaction was seen in the testing and the control group. In all samples, the UHMWPE particles were scattered in the tissue or incorporated in giant cells. CFR-PEEK particles were seen as conglomerates and only could be found next to vessels. CFR-PEEK particles showed no giant-cell reactions. In conclusion, the hypothesis has to be rejected. UHMWPE and PEEK showed a different scatter-behavior in human synovial tissue.

[Possibilities and limits of modern polyethylenes. With respect to the application profile]. / Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der modernen Polyethylene. Im Hinblick auf ihr Anwendungsprofil.

BACKGROUND: Polyethylene is still one of the most important materials in the field of hip and knee arthroplasty. The clinical results of the last decades have helped to further develop polyethylene into a high-tech material. Progress in the development of new materials must be compared with the tried and tested ones to provide optimal and most individual patient care. OBJECTIVES: This article gives an overview of the history and current application profile of the material ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in hip and knee arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: With the aid of the current literature, new developments in the field of the material UHMWPE, also with respect to the biological activity of wear, the particular biomechanics of the knee joint as well as alternative hard-hard bearing surfaces in the hip, are represented in terms of implant safety. RESULTS: The problems concerning polyethylene are now well recognized. The disadvantages of the material UHMWPE could be consistently reduced based on material research so that modern polyethylenes have gradually been shown in clinical trials that they can be reliably used. CONCLUSION: Despite this the potential for improvement has still not yet been fully exploited. Any further development must be extensively tested both biomechanically and biologically before the material can be used in vivo. Long-term results are still necessary before a material can be accepted as being clinically safe.

Biological activity and migration of wear particles in the knee joint: an in vivo comparison of six different polyethylene materials.

Wear of polyethylene causes loosening of joint prostheses because of the particle mediated activity of the host tissue. It was hypothesized that conventional and crosslinked polyethylene particles lead to similar biological effects around the knee joint in vivo as well as to a similar particle distribution in the surrounding tissues. To verify these hypotheses, particle suspensions of six different polyethylene materials were injected into knee joints of Balb/C mice and intravital microscopic, histological and immunohistochemical evaluations were done after 1 week. Whereas the biological effects on the synovial layer and the subchondral bone of femur and tibia were similar for all the polyethylenes, two crosslinked materials showed an elevated cytokine expression in the articular cartilage. Furthermore, the distribution of particles around the joint was dependent on the injected polyethylene material. Those crosslinked particles, which remained mainly in the joint space, showed an increased expression of TNF-alpha in articular cartilage. The data of this study support the use of crosslinked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty. In contrast, the presence of certain crosslinked wear particles in the joint space can lead to an elevated inflammatory reaction in the remaining cartilage, which challenges the potential use of those crosslinked polyethylenes for unicondylar knee prostheses.

Elevated cytokine expression of different PEEK wear particles compared to UHMWPE in vivo.

Due to their mechanical properties, there has been growing interest in poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and its composites as bearing material in total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to analyze the biological activity of wear particles of two different (pitch and PAN) carbon-fiber-reinforced- (CFR-) PEEK varieties in comparison to ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) in vivo. The authors hypothesized no difference between the used biomaterials. Wear particle suspensions of the particulate biomaterials were injected into knee joints of Balb/c mice, which were sacrificed after seven days. The cytokine expression (IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α) was analyzed immunohistochemically in the synovial layer, the adjacent bone marrow and the articular cartilage. Especially in the bone marrow of the two CFR-PEEK varieties there were increased cytokine expressions compared to the control and UHMWPE group. Furthermore, in the articular cartilage the CFR-PEEK pitch group showed an enhanced cytokine expression, which could be a negative predictor for the use in unicondylar knee systems. As these data suggest an increased proinflammatory potential of CFR-PEEK and its composites in vivo, the initial hypothesis had to be refuted. Summarizing these results, CFR-PEEK seems not to be an attractive alternative to UHMWPE as a bearing material, especially in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Polyethylene wear particles induce TLR 2 upregulation in the synovial layer of mice.

A cellular and receptor mediated response to ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear particles results in a release of proinflammatory cytokines and induces an inflammatory reaction causing osteolysis in total joint replacement. This investigation offers insight into the toll-like receptor (TLR) mediated activation by polyethylene wear particles in the synovial layer of mice. We hypothesized that, similar to recent in vitro results, UHMWPE particles lead to an upregulation of TLR 1 and 2 and TLR 4 in vivo in the synovial tissue of mice as well. Therefore, UHMWPE particles were generated in a common knee simulator according to the ISO standard, separated by acid digestion and determined by scanning electron microscopy. Endotoxin was removed using a method based on ultracentrifugation. A particle suspension (50 µl; 0.1 vol./vol.%) was injected into the left knee joint of female Balb/c mice (n = 8). In a control group, phosphate-buffered saline was injected into the left knee of Balb/c mice (n = 8). The mice were sacrificed after 7 days. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with TLR 1, 2 and 4 polyclonal antibodies for Balb/c mice and evaluated by light microscopy. The particle-stimulated group showed a thickened synovial layer, an increased cellular infiltration and a TLR 2-upregulation in the synovial layer compared to the control group. An increased expression of TLR 1 and TLR 4 could not be demonstrated. These results indicate a mainly TLR 2-induced inflammation to polyethylene wear debris in the synovial layer of mice.