Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 299(3): 747-754, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30726553

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To characterize and understand the demographics (age and body mass index, BMI) of a cohort of women who delivered at a single institution over an 11-year period. The purpose of this analysis is to look for effects over time of demographic characteristics on mode of delivery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of singleton deliveries between 2004-2014, n = 27,729; level 1 perinatal center, university hospital setting. Data were extracted from the digital birth registry. All statistical analyses were done using R version 3.5.1. Variables analyzed were: age, BMI, and mode of delivery (in the current and any prior pregnancies). RESULTS: Mean age increased from 31.1 ± 5.2 years in 2004 to 31.5 ± 5.0 years in 2014 (p < 0.001, eta2 = 0.0006). Mean BMI before pregnancy increased from 23.7 ± 4.5 to 24.7 ± 5.2 kg/m2. Mean BMI at delivery increased from 28.5 ± 4.7 to 29.6 ± 5.2 kg/m2 (p < 0.001, eta2 = 0.0049). Regarding maternal age, patients with elective Cesarean section (CS) (32.5 ± 5.3 years), emergency CS (31.6 ± 5.6 years) and CS in labor (31.4 ± 5.3 years) were older compared to those with spontaneous (31.0 ± 5.2 years) or instrument-assisted vaginal delivery such as vacuum (31.0 ± 5.0 years) and forceps (30.2 ± 5.4 years). Among the multiparous patients, the mode of delivery in prior pregnancies is the variable with the greatest effect on the mode of delivery in any subsequent pregnancies. The mode of delivery was: spontaneous (55.5%), vaginal operative including vacuum and forceps (8.8%), and Cesarean section (35.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Increase of age and BMI over years is significant, but very small and in a range which seems not clinically relevant. Previous births have the strongest effects on mode of delivery in the current pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Demografía/métodos , Trabajo de Parto/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 299(2): 371-384, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30467635

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: It was the aim to evaluate the personal preference of mode of delivery and to analyze differences between medical professionals and non-medical professionals. Interest in participating in a risk stratification system was evaluated. We hypothesized that gaining information about risk stratification provided in the survey could potentially change participants' decision regarding the preferred mode of delivery; therefore, subjects were asked twice (before and after providing information). METHODS: Five cohorts [four professionals (MP) including participants of the German Urogynecology Congress 2017, employees of two major university hospitals in Germany, and members of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and one non-professional group (NP) including pregnant women] were invited online to participate in this survey. RESULTS: Vaginal delivery was the preferred mode of delivery in both groups (MP 90.4% vs. NP 88.8%; p = 0.429). MP are more likely to opt for CS due to concerns regarding pelvic floor disorders (MP 56.6% vs. NP 9.1%; p < 0.001). Likewise, parity and prior experienced CS (pCS) had a significant impact on the decision towards vaginal delivery (parity MP OR 7.5 95% CI 4.6-12.3, NP OR 9.3 95% CI 1.9-44.2; (pCS) MP OR 0.12 95% CI 0.07-0.19, NP OR 0.05 95% CI 0.01-0.25). There is great interest in participating in risk stratification systems in the majority of participants (68.9%). CONCLUSIONS: MP and NP prefer vaginal birth for themselves or their partners. Within the group that opted for CS, MP were significantly more often concerned about pelvic floor disorders. Future prevention aspects might include education about pelvic floor disorders.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Personal de Salud/normas , Madres/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Toma de Decisiones , Parto Obstétrico , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Embarazo , Gestión de Riesgos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Front Physiol ; 9: 1278, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30283344

RESUMEN

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), which is already known to be a risk factor for pathological intrauterine development, perinatal mortality, and morbidity, is now also assumed to cause both physical and cognitive alterations in later child development. In the current study, effects of IUGR on infantile brain function were investigated during the fetal period and in a follow-up developmental assessment during early childhood. During the fetal period, visual and auditory event-related responses (VER and AER) were recorded using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG). VER latencies were analyzed in 73 fetuses (14 IUGR fetuses) while AER latencies were analyzed in 66 fetuses (11 IUGR fetuses). Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition (BSID-II) were used to assess the developmental status of the infants at the age of 24 months. The Mental Development Index (MDI) was available from 66 children (8 IUGR fetuses) and the Psychomotor Development Index (PDI) from 63 children (7 IUGR fetuses). Latencies to visual stimulation were more delayed in IUGR than in small for gestational age (SGA) or appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses, albeit not to any significant extent (p = 0.282). The MDI in former IUGR infants was significantly lower (p = 0.044) than in former SGA and AGA infants. However, IUGR had no impact on PDI (p = 0.213). These findings support the hypothesis that IUGR may constitute a risk factor for neurodevelopmental delay. Further investigation of the possible underlying mechanisms, as well as continued long-term developmental research, is therefore necessary.

5.
Z Gastroenterol ; 55(3): 277-290, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068731

RESUMEN

In geriatric patients, ultrasound is the appropriate diagnostic technique to detect and to follow-up underlying and accompanying diseases of the heart, lung, liver, kidneys, pancreas, gastrointestinal tract and of arterial and venous vessels. Based on a systematic survey of the published literature, this review describes the value of ultrasound in geriatric patients focussing on point of care.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ultrasonografía/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA