Outcomes of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter ablation: randomized study comparing single vs. multiple catheter procedures-the SIMPLE study.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with symptomatic typical AFl. Although the conventional multi-catheter approach is the standard of care for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation, a single-catheter approach was recently described as a feasible alternative. The present study sought to compare safety, efficacy, and efficiency of single vs. multi-catheter approach for atrial flutter (AFl) ablation. METHODS: In this randomized multi-center study, consecutive patients referred for AFl ablation (n = 253) were enrolled and randomized to multiple vs. single-catheter approach for CTI ablation. In the single-catheter arm, PR interval (PRI) on the surface ECG was used to prove CTI block. Procedural and follow-up data were collected and compared between the two arms. RESULTS: 128 and 125 patients were assigned to the single-catheter and to the multi-catheter arms, respectively. In the single-catheter arm, procedure time was significantly shorter (37 ± 25 vs. 48 ± 27 minutes, p = 0.002) and required less fluoroscopy time (430 ± 461 vs. 712 ± 628 seconds, p < 0.001) and less radiofrequency time (428 ± 316 vs. 643 ± 519 seconds, p < 0.001), achieving a higher first-pass CTI block rate (55 (45%) vs. 37 (31%), p = 0.044), compared with the multi-catheter arm. After a median follow-up of 12 months, 11 (4%) patients experienced AFl recurrences (5 (4%) in the single-catheter arm and 6 (5%) in the multi-catheter arm, p = 0.99). No differences were found in arrhythmia-free survival between arms (log-rank = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The single-catheter approach for typical AFl ablation is not inferior to the conventional multiple-catheter approach, reducing procedure, fluoroscopy, and radiofrequency time.

Resultados en España de la encuesta de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología sobre terapia de resincronización cardiaca (CRT-Survey II) / Spanish results of the Second European Cardiac resynchronization therapy survey (CRT-Survey II)

Introducción y objetivos: Se describen los resultados en España de la segunda encuesta de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología sobre terapia de resincronización cardiaca (CRT-Survey II) y se comparan con los de los demás países participantes. Métodos: Pacientes a los que se implantó un dispositivo de terapia de resincronización cardiaca entre octubre de 2015 y diciembre de 2016 en 36 centros participantes. Se recogieron datos sobre las características basales de los pacientes y del implante, y un seguimiento a corto plazo hasta el alta hospitalaria. Resultados: La tasa de éxito del implante fue del 95,9%. La mediana [intervalo intercuartílico] de implantes anuales/centro en España fue significativamente menor que en los demás países participantes: 30 [21-50] frente a 55 [33-100] implantes/año (p=0,00003). En los centros españoles hubo una menor proporción de pacientes de edad ≥ 75 años (el 27,9 frente al 32,4%; p=0,0071), una mayor proporción de pacientes en clase funcional II de la New York Heart Association (el 46,9 frente al 36,9%; p <0,00001) y un mayor porcentaje de pacientes con criterios electrocardiográficos de bloqueo de rama izquierda (el 82,9 frente al 74,6%; p <0,00001). La media de la estancia hospitalaria fue menor en los centros españoles (5,8+/-8,5 frente a 6,4+/-11,6; p <0,00001) y una mayor proporción de pacientes recibieron un cable de ventrículo izquierdo cuadripolar (el 74 frente al 56%; p <0,00001) y fueron seguidos a distancia (el 55,8 frente al 27,7%; p <0,00001). Conclusiones: La encuesta CRT-Survey II muestra que en España hay una menor proporción de pacientes de 75 o más años que reciben un dispositivo de terapia de resincronización cardiaca, una mayor proporción de pacientes en clase funcional II de la New York Heart Association, con bloqueo completo de la rama izquierda del haz de His y con seguimiento a distancia, con estancias hospitalarias significativamente menores

Introduction and objectives: We describe the results for Spain of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II) and compare them with those of the other participating countries. Methods: We included patients undergoing CRT device implantation between October 2015 and December 2016 in 36 participating Spanish centers. We registered the patients' baseline characteristics, implant procedure data, and short-term follow-up information until hospital discharge. Results: Implant success was achieved in 95.9%. The median [interquartile range] annual implantation rate by center was significantly lower in Spain than in the other participating countries: 30 implants/y [21-50] vs 55 implants/y [33-100]; P=.00003. In Spanish centers, there was a lower proportion of patients ≥ 75 years (27.9% vs 32.4%; P=.0071), a higher proportion in NYHA class II (46.9% vs 36.9%, P <.00001), and a higher percentage with electrocardiographic criteria of left bundle branch block (82.9% vs 74.6%; P <.00001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in Spanish centers (5.8+/-8.5 days vs 6.4+/-11.6; P <.00001). Spanish patients were more likely to receive a quadripolar LV lead (74% vs 56%, P <.00001) and to be followed up by remote monitoring (55.8% vs 27.7%; P <.00001). Conclusions: The CRT-Survey II shows that, compared with other participating countries, fewer patients in Spain aged ≥ 75 years received a CRT device, while more patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II and had left bundle branch block. In addition, the length of hospital stay was shorter, and there was greater use of quadripolar LV leads and remote CRT monitoring

Spanish Results of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II).

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We describe the results for Spain of the Second European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey (CRT-Survey II) and compare them with those of the other participating countries. METHODS: We included patients undergoing CRT device implantation between October 2015 and December 2016 in 36 participating Spanish centers. We registered the patients' baseline characteristics, implant procedure data, and short-term follow-up information until hospital discharge. RESULTS: Implant success was achieved in 95.9%. The median [interquartile range] annual implantation rate by center was significantly lower in Spain than in the other participating countries: 30 implants/y [21-50] vs 55 implants/y [33-100]; P=.00003. In Spanish centers, there was a lower proportion of patients ≥ 75 years (27.9% vs 32.4%; P=.0071), a higher proportion in New York Heart Association functional class II (46.9% vs 36.9%; P <.00001), and a higher percentage with electrocardiographic criteria of left bundle branch block (82.9% vs 74.6%; P <.00001). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in Spanish centers (5.8±8.5 days vs 6.4±11.6; P <.00001). Spanish patients were more likely to receive a quadripolar LV lead (74% vs 56%; P <.00001) and to be followed up by remote monitoring (55.8% vs 27.7%; P <.00001). CONCLUSIONS: The CRT-Survey II shows that, compared with other participating countries, fewer patients in Spain aged ≥ 75 years received a CRT device, while more patients were in New York Heart Association functional class II and had left bundle branch block. In addition, the length of hospital stay was shorter, and there was greater use of quadripolar LV leads and remote CRT monitoring.

Coronary sinus aneurysm and left ventricular-coronary sinus fistula. Implantation of CRT device.

We describe a 72-year-old man referred for implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy device who had previously undergone repeated operations to replace the mitral valve. Retrograde venography of the coronary sinus (CS) to implant the left ventricular (LV) pacing lead revealed aneurysmal dilatation of the CS with LV-CS fistula that hindered-but did not prevent-complete implantation of the system.

The MUSIC Risk score: a simple method for predicting mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure.

AIMS: The prognosis of chronic heart failure (CHF) is extremely variable, although generally poor. The purpose of this study was to develop prognostic models for CHF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 992 consecutive ambulatory CHF patients was prospectively followed for a median of 44 months. Multivariable Cox models were developed to predict all-cause mortality (n = 267), cardiac mortality (primary end-point, n = 213), pump-failure death (n = 123), and sudden death (n = 90). The four final models included several combinations of the same 10 independent predictors: prior atherosclerotic vascular event, left atrial size >26 mm/m(2), ejection fraction < or =35%, atrial fibrillation, left bundle-branch block or intraventricular conduction delay, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and frequent ventricular premature beats, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), hyponatremia < or =138 mEq/L, NT-proBNP >1.000 ng/L, and troponin-positive. On the basis of Cox models, the MUSIC Risk scores were calculated. A cardiac mortality score >20 points identified a high-risk subgroup with a four-fold cardiac mortality risk. CONCLUSION: A simple score with a limited number of non-invasive variables successfully predicted cardiac mortality in a real-life cohort of CHF patients. The use of this model in clinical practice identifies a subgroup of high-risk patients that should be closely managed.

Left atrial enlargement and NT-proBNP as predictors of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure.

AIMS: The identification of valuable markers of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with established HF remains a challenge. We sought to assess the value of clinical, echocardiographic and biochemical variables to predict SCD in a consecutive cohort of patients with heart failure (HF) due to systolic dysfunction. METHODS: A cohort of 494 patients with established HF had baseline echocardiographic and NT-proBNP measurements and were followed for 942+/-323 days. RESULTS: Fifty patients suffered SCD. Independent predictors of SCD were indexed LA size>26 mm/m2 (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.0; p=0.0007), NT-proBNP>908 ng/L (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.5-6.7; p=0.003), history of myocardial infarction (HR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.1; p=0.007), peripheral oedema (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-3.9; p=0.02), and diabetes mellitus (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.3; p=0.03). NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction and glomerular filtration rate were not independent predictors of SCD in this cohort. Notably, the combination of both LA size>26 mm/m2 and NT-proBNP>908 ng/L increased the risk of SCD (HR 4.3; 95% CI 2.5-7.6; p<0.0001). At 36 months, risk of SCD in patients with indexed LA size26 mm/m2 and NT-proBNP>908 ng/L reached 25% (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among HF patients, indexed LA size and NT-proBNP levels are more useful to stratify risk of SCD than other clinical, echocardiographic or biochemical variables. The combination of these two parameters should be considered for predicting SCD in patients with HF.

Nuevos retos en la optimización de los dispositivos de resincronización / New Challenges in the Optimization of Resynchronization Devices

Con la terapia de resincronización cardíaca se han obtenido beneficios en hasta un 70% de los pacientes con disfunción ventricular izquierda y bloqueo de rama izquierda. La disponibilidad en el mercado de dispositivos con capacidad para determinar diferentes secuencias de activación auriculoventricular y ventriculares pretende optimizar la efectividad de estos dispositivos y mejorar la respuesta clínica de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca. Sin embargo, todavía hay muchas incógnitas al respecto en la programación, como son la metodología a seguir y su eficacia clínica. A continuación revisamos el estado actual de estas limitaciones (AU)

Cardiac resynchronization therapy has shown benefits in up to 70% of patients with left ventricular dysfunction and left bundle branch block. The availability in the market of devices that are able to produce different atrioventricular or ventricular activation sequences will help optimize device effectiveness and, hence, improve the clinical responses of patients with heart failure. However, much has still to be learned about how they should be programmed, about the best methodology to use, and about their clinical efficacy. Here, we review the extent of current limitations to our knowledge (AU)