Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in geriatric patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A single-center retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely employed for antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is still uncertainty about their risk-benefit profile in older patients. Here, we evaluated the efficacy, safety, and dose appropriateness of DOACs in a real-world population of outpatients with non-valvular AF, with a specific focus on subjects aged over 80 years and/or with reduced renal function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective study including patients who had been prescribed a DOAC between May 2014 and May 2021 for long-term anticoagulation in non-valvular AF. Patients anticoagulated for <4 weeks were excluded. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, stroke, or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 1154 patients (median age 84 yrs., range 57-100 yrs.), among which 862 were 80 years and older, were included. In the subgroup of subjects ≥80 yrs., a subtherapeutic dose of DOAC was associated with an increased incidence of CV mortality, stroke, or systemic embolism (multivariable Cox regression, HR = 2.09, 95 % CI: 1.09-4.02), with no benefit in terms of prevalence of bleeding events (21.5 % vs. 18.6 %, p = 0.428), and the incidence of adverse safety and efficacy outcomes was not increased in patients with a reduced renal function (eGFR ≤30 mL/min). Plasma concentration of DOACs, assessed in a subset of 367 patients, did not increase with advanced age (≥ 80 yrs., two-way ANOVA, p = 0.656) nor with declining eGFR (≤30 mL/min, two-way ANOVA, p = 0.643) and was not associated with adverse safety and efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Data from our study support the use of DOACs in populations of older adults and remark on the risks associated with inappropriate prescriptions in terms of CV mortality and adverse events.

Early administration of tofacitinib in COVID-19 pneumonitis: An open randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Controversies on sub-populations most sensitive to therapy and the best timing of starting the treatment still surround the use of immunomodulatory drugs in COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: We designed a multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial to test the effect of prompt adding of tofacitinib to standard therapy for hospitalised patients affected by mild/moderate COVID-19 pneumonitis. METHODS: Patients admitted to three Italian hospitals affected by COVID-19 pneumonitis not requiring mechanical ventilation were randomised to receive standard treatment alone or tofacitinib (10 mg/bid) for 2 weeks, starting within the first 24 h from admission. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were randomised; 49 in the experimental arm completed the 14-day treatment period, 9 discontinued tofacitinib as the disease worsened and were included in the analysis, and 1 died of respiratory failure. All 58 control patients completed the study. Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar between the study groups. In the tofacitinib group, 9/58 (15.5%) patients progressed to noninvasive ventilation (CPAP) to maintain SO2 > 93%, invasive mechanical ventilation or death by day 14 was 15.5%, significantly less than in the control group (20/58, 34.4%, RR 0,45, RRR -55%, NNT 5; p = .018). No differences in severe adverse effect incidence had been observed across the groups. CONCLUSION: High-dose tofacitinib therapy in patients with COVID pneumonitis is safe and may prevent deterioration to respiratory failure.

Decreased serum levels of the inflammaging marker miR-146a are associated with clinical non-response to tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients.

Current COVID-19 pandemic poses an unprecedented threat to global health and healthcare systems. The most amount of the death toll is accounted by old people affected by age-related diseases that develop a hyper-inflammatory syndrome. In this regard, we hypothesized that COVID-19 severity may be linked to inflammaging. Here, we examined 30 serum samples from patients enrolled in the clinical trial NCT04315480 assessing the clinical response to a single-dose intravenous infusion of the anti-IL-6 receptor drug Tocilizumab (TCZ) in COVID-19 patients with multifocal interstitial pneumonia. In these serum samples, as well as in 29 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects, we assessed a set of microRNAs that regulate inflammaging, i.e. miR-146a-5p, miR-21-5p, and miR-126-3p, which were quantified by RT-PCR and Droplet Digital PCR. We showed that COVID-19 patients who did not respond to TCZ have lower serum levels of miR-146a-5p after the treatment (p = 0.007). Among non-responders, those with the lowest serum levels of miR-146a-5p experienced the most adverse outcome (p = 0.008). Our data show that a blood-based biomarker, such as miR-146a-5p, can provide clues about the molecular link between inflammaging and COVID-19 clinical course, thus allowing to better understand the use of biologic drug armory against this worldwide health threat.

Low incidence of nephrotoxicity following intravenous administration of iodinated contrast media: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after intravenous (iv) iodinated contrast material (ICM) exposure. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included all consecutive patients who underwent radiological investigations using low-osmolar iopamidol 370 mg/ml in a regional hospital over a period of 36 months, without any exclusion criteria. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was evaluated using the MRDR equation before (2-10 days) and after (24-36 h) radiological investigations. CI-AKI was defined as a ≥ 25% decrease in eGFR from baseline. CI-AKI incidence was estimated using a binomial distribution. The association between CI-AKI and demographic and clinical characteristics was modeled using logistic regression. RESULTS: The study included 1541 patients with a median age of 68 (1st-3rd quartiles 58-76) years with various comorbidities, 30% of whom had pre-existing CKD. Patients affected by stage III or IV chronic kidney disease (CKD) received an infusion of 0.9% normal saline (1.0-1.5 ml/kg/h) before and after iso-osmolar iodixanol administration. CI-AKI was observed in 33 patients (2.1%, 95% CI 1.5-3.0). The logistic regression analysis showed that antibiotic and statin therapies were significantly associated with CI-AKI. The probability of developing CI-AKI decreased by 80% in patients taking statins (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.03; 0.68) and increased approximately three times in patients with antibiotic therapy compared with those who did not take statins and antibiotics (OR = 2.92, 95% CI 1.21; 6.36). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that low-osmolar iopamidol carries a low incidence of nephrotoxicity, even in subjects with various comorbid conditions or reduced renal function. KEY POINTS: • IV administration of ICM carries a low incidence of nephrotoxicity, which was transient in observed patients. • Statin therapy is negatively associated with AKI in patients exposed to ICM. • Pre-existing impairment of renal function is not associated with AKI in patients exposed to ICM.